Revision as of 04:05, 25 September 2023 edit2404:3100:1449:4b1e:20fd:13ff:fea3:7701 (talk) →Changes to aircraft articles lead infobox images.: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:07, 25 September 2023 edit undo2404:3100:1449:4b1e:20fd:13ff:fea3:7701 (talk) →Changes to aircraft articles lead infobox images.Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
== Changes to aircraft articles lead infobox images. == | == Changes to aircraft articles lead infobox images. == | ||
In the recent instances, you reverted the edits on ], ] and ] stating that changes needed to be discussed beforehand. However, the ] who initially reverted the edits on ] had actually changed the lead image on the article ] without any prior discussion on 30 August 2023 stating that the image had a better view. This puts the applicability of the said guideline into question. ] (]) 04:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC) | In the recent instances, you reverted the edits on ], ] and ] stating that changes needed to be discussed beforehand. However, the ] who initially reverted the edits on ] had actually changed the lead image on the article ] without any prior discussion on 30 August 2023 stating that the image had a better view. This puts the applicability of the said guideline into question. ] (]) 04:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:07, 25 September 2023
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Before posting, please read and follow the notes below.
|
Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Thank you message for NCIS: Sydney
Thanks for all your help! 142.162.35.37 (talk) 10:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- You're most welcome. BilCat (talk) 18:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Wish you hugs and chocolate! 142.162.35.37 (talk) 19:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, I LOVE chocolate!!! BilCat (talk) 20:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- Wish you hugs and chocolate! 142.162.35.37 (talk) 19:58, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Departing the fix outbound
Hi Bill, Just to let you know that as of today I am done with editing Misplaced Pages, for reasons that are well explained on my talk page. It has been great working with you for almost two decades. You are one of the few people left here whom I will miss. If you feel like dropping me a line you can reach me at wikieditor07.sca9z@ncf.ca Same goes for any other Wiki friends here who are watching your page. - Ahunt (talk) 00:13, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- I totally understand. I may be joining you imminently. I'll send you a note, and hopefully we can find another venue to make fun of morons. :) BilCat (talk) 00:18, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- . - Ahunt (talk) 00:20, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- you will be both missed, the place becomes more like a haunted house full of screeching avian beings out of a surreal episode of aircraft accident investigations... The flight recorder replay is showing some very weird objects... JarrahTree 06:47, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I haven't left quite yet. We'll see. BilCat (talk) 02:08, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- you will be both missed, the place becomes more like a haunted house full of screeching avian beings out of a surreal episode of aircraft accident investigations... The flight recorder replay is showing some very weird objects... JarrahTree 06:47, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- . - Ahunt (talk) 00:20, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Edit of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Helicopter_Interdiction_Tactical_Squadron
Hello Bill. You recently did an edit to the Coast Guard HITRON page I had edited and you stated no source stated. The problem is, the “only” source available are the actual people, such as myself, that actually built the unit up from ground zero. Their were only 10 of us, be happy to have a “second” of one of the other plank owner members back me up on any and all info I add to this page, as, not to boast, I am a subject matter expert on. Please do me the courtesy and contact me direct on this request. I anm older now annd a dinosaur when it comes to a lot of computer and Wiki protocols so please, not to excuse my lack of this knowledge, but trying the best I can do as I always do through a 32yr military career. Appreciate your time. Charlie H10Plank (talk) 02:07, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Oops
Mixed up the before and after on the Gimli Glider edit. Mea culpa, thanks for the fix. –IagoQnsi (talk) 05:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- No worries. I've mixed up diffs plenty of times myself. At first I wasn't sure what had happened, but once I looked at you userpage, talk page, and recent contributions, I figured it was probably a mistake. I just made my edit as clear as possible (on then second try!), and moved on. I'm glad that you realized your mistake, and that you let me know. Take care. BilCat (talk) 07:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
enwp uses gap or comma
hi bilcat, can you point me to the MOS where it is written that gaps are not allowed as thousands separators? the one i know: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Numbers states: "In general, digits should be grouped and separated either by commas or by narrow gaps (never a period/full point)." --ThurnerRupert (talk) 09:48, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry, I misspoke. However, there's no reason to change from one style to another, per the WP:RETAIN principle. BilCat (talk) 21:23, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
interesting, WP:RETAIN is contradicting Misplaced Pages:Manual_of_Style#Opportunities_for_commonality, but at least it lists strong national ties as acceptable, and reduce ambiguity as acceptable. this article has quite some comma numbers, sources are central europe where the comma is different. this then led to wrong contents like (destilled a little to make it more obvious) "it is 9.10 m long, then they added 1.5 which made it 10.25 m". i at least fall for the same, not calculating correctly any more if i see commas all over the place. so i replaced the commas with gaps (or nothing when the numbers where 4 digits) and the ambiguity was gone. would this be ok for you as well? --ThurnerRupert (talk) 23:43, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Strong national ties and commonality don't apply in these cases. You should probably read the extremely long discussion at WT:MOSNUM#Grouping of digits with commas is not allowed for numbers in the SI first. It doesn't specifically address your suggestions, but it does show there's no consensus for restricting the use of commas as thousands separators. Once you've read that discussion, you could raise your points, and see what happens. I will note that a German editor, User:Denniss, reverted your edits here, including your substantion of gaps for commas. BilCat (talk) 00:31, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Changes to aircraft articles lead infobox images.
In the recent instances, you reverted the edits on Chengdu J-7, IAI Kfir and IAI Nesher stating that changes needed to be discussed beforehand. However, the User:FOX 52 who initially reverted the edits on Chengdu J-7 had actually changed the lead image on the article Tupolev Tu-160 without any prior discussion on 30 August 2023 stating that the image had a better view. This puts the applicability of the said guideline into question. 2404:3100:1449:4B1E:20FD:13FF:FEA3:7701 (talk) 04:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC)