Revision as of 08:35, 1 October 2023 editDolphin51 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers31,481 edits →Reverting unnecessary edits: ReplyTags: Reverted Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:40, 1 October 2023 edit undoBilCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers215,714 edits Undid revision 1178050000 by Dolphin51 (talk) unintelligible - move on, and stop making unnecessary edits, or they will be revertedTag: Manual revertNext edit → | ||
Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
:No worries. I've mixed up diffs plenty of times myself. At first I wasn't sure what had happened, but once I looked at you userpage, talk page, and recent contributions, I figured it was probably a mistake. I just made my edit as clear as possible (on then second try!), and moved on. I'm glad that you realized your mistake, and that you let me know. Take care. ] (]) 07:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC) | :No worries. I've mixed up diffs plenty of times myself. At first I wasn't sure what had happened, but once I looked at you userpage, talk page, and recent contributions, I figured it was probably a mistake. I just made my edit as clear as possible (on then second try!), and moved on. I'm glad that you realized your mistake, and that you let me know. Take care. ] (]) 07:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
== Reverting unnecessary edits == | |||
Hi BilCat. Around 30 September I edited the caption of an image on ]. I changed “widebody” to ] to match the title of the article; and I added the word “engines” to “turbofans” to make the expression “turbofan engines”. In my edit summary I foolishly used the words “colloquial” and “unencyclopaedic”. Understandably, you disagreed with these descriptors and you objected to my use of these words in my edit summary. You showed your disapproval by reverting my edit. | |||
Are you aware that at ] it says ''Do not revert an edit as a means of showing your disapproval of the edit summary''? | |||
Misplaced Pages has an article titled ]. This expression appears to be used many hundreds of times throughout Misplaced Pages. Are you proposing a project to erase the word “aircraft” every time it is used in this expression, on the grounds that “widebody” is not unencyclopaedic? Presumably not. Similarly, are you proposing to erase the word “engine(s)” everywhere it is appended to “turbofan”? Again, presumably not. What message, if any, can we derive from your revert? ] ''(])'' 02:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
:The message that you should derive from my recent and summary is that you are being needlessly picky, and that your edits didn't need to be made in the first place. I don't generally make reverts solely to disagree with the edit summary, and that certainly wasn't the case here. I was disagreeing with your edit, and with your stated reasons. I didn't think it needed to be elaborated on at the time. Captions should be fairly short, and in context, we don't need to repeat what should be fairly obvious. Both words are linked, if there's any question about what they refer to. Btw, ] is the title of the article, in line with ], ], et al. I do hope you won't be proposing to rename all of these to include "engine" in the title, but if you do, you can be sure of my "Extremely strong oppose" ivote. Also, the other title is ], not ]. ] (]) 02:25, 1 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks for your very prompt reply. I’m satisfied you heard my message loud and clear. ] and ] explain my actions perfectly. | |||
::You have written “you are being needlessly picky ... edits didn’t need to be made in the first place.” That is not a sentiment I have ever seen on Misplaced Pages and you haven’t provided a blue link to clarify what you have in mind. I will be grateful if you provide a blue link or two to support your claims. | |||
::I look forward to continuing to work with you in the aviation portal. ] ''(])'' 08:35, 1 October 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:40, 1 October 2023
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Before posting, please read and follow the notes below.
|
Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Edit of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Helicopter_Interdiction_Tactical_Squadron
Hello Bill. You recently did an edit to the Coast Guard HITRON page I had edited and you stated no source stated. The problem is, the “only” source available are the actual people, such as myself, that actually built the unit up from ground zero. Their were only 10 of us, be happy to have a “second” of one of the other plank owner members back me up on any and all info I add to this page, as, not to boast, I am a subject matter expert on. Please do me the courtesy and contact me direct on this request. I anm older now annd a dinosaur when it comes to a lot of computer and Wiki protocols so please, not to excuse my lack of this knowledge, but trying the best I can do as I always do through a 32yr military career. Appreciate your time. Charlie H10Plank (talk) 02:07, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Oops
Mixed up the before and after on the Gimli Glider edit. Mea culpa, thanks for the fix. –IagoQnsi (talk) 05:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- No worries. I've mixed up diffs plenty of times myself. At first I wasn't sure what had happened, but once I looked at you userpage, talk page, and recent contributions, I figured it was probably a mistake. I just made my edit as clear as possible (on then second try!), and moved on. I'm glad that you realized your mistake, and that you let me know. Take care. BilCat (talk) 07:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC)