| Revision as of 19:18, 7 October 2023 editBilCat (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers215,710 edits →Atacms missile article and Finland's cancelled order: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:24, 8 October 2023 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,373,141 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:BilCat/archive25. (BOT)Next edit → | ||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == Oops == | |||
| Mixed up the before and after on the ] edit. Mea culpa, thanks for the fix. –] (]) 05:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :No worries. I've mixed up diffs plenty of times myself. At first I wasn't sure what had happened, but once I looked at you userpage, talk page, and recent contributions, I figured it was probably a mistake. I just made my edit as clear as possible (on then second try!), and moved on. I'm glad that you realized your mistake, and that you let me know. Take care. ] (]) 07:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| Line 98: | Line 92: | ||
| :Not right off, though it's probably best to bring this up on the article's talk page to get broader input. ] (]) 19:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC) | :Not right off, though it's probably best to bring this up on the article's talk page to get broader input. ] (]) 19:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC) | ||
| == Atacms missile article and Finland's cancelled order == |
== Atacms missile article and Finland's cancelled order == | ||
| You reverted my change to ATACS missile with claim of "missing citation" but the original citation contained also source for my claim. Your claim of "missing citation" was very clearly wrong. --] (]) 13:49, 7 October 2023 (UTC) | You reverted my change to ATACS missile with claim of "missing citation" but the original citation contained also source for my claim. Your claim of "missing citation" was very clearly wrong. --] (]) 13:49, 7 October 2023 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 01:24, 8 October 2023
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
 | Before posting, please read and follow the notes below.
|
 Archives |
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14.5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Xi'an_Y-20
Hello,
I recently noticed your addition of a label about the criticism or controversy section of this article and alleging it may compromise neutrality. I'm unsure of adding it to the "development" section, even though it seemed from the beginning to me that since the C-17 plans were stolen from Boeing and the Xi'an Y-20 is a copy more or less, it probably would best go there since that was an integral part of the development of the aircraft. However, I have seen a lot of other articles where things like this are specifically listed in a "Controversy" section. Do you have any recommendations on which part of the article this information should go in? Thanks. jlcoving (talk) 19:46, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Not right off, though it's probably best to bring this up on the article's talk page to get broader input. BilCat (talk) 19:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Atacms missile article and Finland's cancelled order
You reverted my change to ATACS missile with claim of "missing citation" but the original citation contained also source for my claim. Your claim of "missing citation" was very clearly wrong. --Hkultala (talk) 13:49, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- You need to make it clear in your edit summary where your information comes from when adding material. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 19:18, 7 October 2023 (UTC)