Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/MIAJudges: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:05, 7 August 2023 editCourcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits Archiving case section to w:en:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/MIAJudges/Archive (using spihelper.js)Tags: Replaced Manual revert← Previous edit Revision as of 10:35, 23 October 2023 edit undoEducatedRedneck (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users981 editsNo edit summaryTags: Reverted 2017 wikitext editorNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{SPIarchive notice|MIAJudges}} {{SPIarchive notice|MIAJudges}}
{{SPIpriorcases}} {{SPIpriorcases}}

===23 October 2023===
{{SPI case status|CUrequest}}
====Suspected sockpuppets====
{{sock list|1=8planets|tools_link=yes}}<!-- Add more accounts or IPs to this template as needed -->

MIAJudges had an almost exclusive interest in judges and was cBanned on 20 July. 8planets was created 6 days later and immediately began editing articles of judges. There is no overlap in specific articles that I saw, but both exclusively edited judge articles. Both use identical-style edit summaries, often one-word such as "Picture" "Link", or the occasional "Missing word". Finally, 8planets added to their own talk page ] a month ago, then went to MLAJudges website earlier today to ]. It seems possible that MLAJudges made a sock, copied their old task list, then realized that it was incriminating and tried to cover their tracks.] (]) 10:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC) ] (]) 10:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

====<big>Comments by other users</big>====
:<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>

====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====


----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 10:35, 23 October 2023

MIAJudges

MIAJudges (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/MIAJudges/Archive.


23 October 2023

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

MIAJudges had an almost exclusive interest in judges and was cBanned on 20 July. 8planets was created 6 days later and immediately began editing articles of judges. There is no overlap in specific articles that I saw, but both exclusively edited judge articles. Both use identical-style edit summaries, often one-word such as "Picture" "Link", or the occasional "Missing word". Finally, 8planets added to their own talk page this list of judges without pictures a month ago, then went to MLAJudges website earlier today to remove that identical list made by MLAJudges from MLAJudges' talk page. It seems possible that MLAJudges made a sock, copied their old task list, then realized that it was incriminating and tried to cover their tracks.EducatedRedneck (talk) 10:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC) EducatedRedneck (talk) 10:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Categories: