Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jeffpw: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:02, 26 March 2007 view sourceBobTheTomato (talk | contribs)2,842 edits The Hillary Imbroglio← Previous edit Revision as of 02:36, 27 March 2007 view source MiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 2d) to User talk:Jeffpw/Archive 5.Next edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
| ] ] ] ] | ] ] ] ]
|} |}

== Thanks for your note ==

I appreciate your note on my talk page. What's past is past, and I'm certain that we can both improve the project moving forward. Ironically enough, I think you'll find that I'm closer politically to you than you might think, based on our disagreements in the past. I am very hopeful that we can move forward and work in harmony for the betterment of the project. Thanks again for the nice note.] 16:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


== nooo == == nooo ==

Revision as of 02:36, 27 March 2007

Archive

Archives


1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8

nooo

not my logic! you'll hurt my kitties' feelings. — coelacan13:42, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

All right--I'm meowing with the rest of them now. Jeffpw 13:55, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
=D I rather like the sound of logic cats. — coelacan19:32, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

The Hillary Imbroglio

I'm no big fan of Sen. Clinton, but that ANI was absolute GREATNESS! Do the Republicans have a team of folks out policing userpages or something? My WORD! Who cares who you support for president in '08, or if you put a picture of that person on your userpage?!? It's shocking to me that people have the time to go around policing other people's userpages... K. Scott Bailey 06:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Wow! Even MORE fascinating reading! I can't believe she actually sent correspondence to a UNIVERSITY without contacting the foundation! Talk about being drunk on the powers of adminship. I wonder if she actually thought her position gave her the right to speak on behalf of the project to an outside organization like that? That's cojones, I'll give her that!K. Scott Bailey 10:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)