Revision as of 18:29, 31 March 2005 editAncheta Wis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users39,283 edits →See also← Previous edit |
Revision as of 23:53, 2 April 2005 edit undoBeland (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators236,679 edits (Insertion of material is pending.)Next edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
:Note: the current contents of this page are expected to change as consensus is reached. |
|
:''Note: The contents of this page are expected to change as consensus is reached.'' |
|
{{histOfScience}} |
|
{{histOfScience}} |
|
This '''history of discredited and pseudoscience'''is an account of the development of the '''protosciences'''; that is, statements about the natural world which were once thought to be authoritative. Protosciences differ from '''pseudoscience''' or '''discredited work''', as they are ''partial'', or ''incomplete work''. |
|
|
|
|
|
From ] up to the time of the ], inquiry into the workings of the universe was known as ], but this included fields of ] which today have been divorced from science. The ancient people of Western civilization who we might think of as '']'' may have thought of themselves as ''natural philosophers''. In other cases, systematic learning about the ] was a direct outgrowth of ], often as a project of a particular religious community. An account of the development of (natural) philosophy from ancient times until recent times can be found in ]'s ''History of Philosophy''. |
|
|
|
|
|
] (sculpture)]] |
|
|
One important feature of ''non-scientific'' natural philosophy is a reluctance to engage in ]. For example, ] is one of the most prolific natural philosophers of ]. He made countless observations of nature, especially the ]s and ] of ]s and ]s in the world around him, which he devote considerable attention to ]. He also made many ]s about the large-scale workings of the universe, which led to his development of a comprehensive theory of physics in his missives of the same name. (See ].) |
|
|
|
|
|
But Aristotle did not make ]s in the way that modern scientific theories are expected to. |
|
|
|
|
|
An '''obsolete scientific theory''' is a ] that was once commonly accepted but (for whatever reason) is no longer considered the most complete description of reality by mainstream ]; or a ] theory which has been shown to be false. This label does not cover theories that are yet to gain wide support in the scientific community (] or ]). This also does not cover theories that were never widely accepted, or theories which were only supported in specific countries because of the imposition of dictatorial regimes (such as ]). |
|
|
|
|
|
In some cases, the theory has been completely discarded. In other cases, the theory is still useful because it provides a description that is "good enough" for a particular situation, and is more easily used than the complete theory (often because the complete theory is too mathematically complex to be usable). ] suggested that all scientific theories should be ] otherwise they could not be tested by experiment. Anything which cannot be shown by experiment to be false would therefore be an ] and have an absolute status, beyond any refutation. |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- rough dates when these were accepted and disproven (birth and death) would be appreciated! --> |
|
|
<!-- categories would be good too. groups of theories seem to be wiped out in a single blow, while others slowly lose favour --> |
|
|
|
|
|
==Obsolete biology theories== |
|
|
* ] - but revitalised in ] - see also ] |
|
|
* ] - obsoleted by ] |
|
|
* ] (abiogenesis) |
|
|
* ] - or "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" |
|
|
|
|
|
==Obsolete chemistry theories== |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] - replaced by ] work on oxidation |
|
|
|
|
|
==Obsolete physics theories== |
|
|
* ] - discredited by ] |
|
|
* ] - failed to be detected by the ], made obsolete by ]'s work. |
|
|
* ] of the atom - assuming the protons and electrons were mixed together in a single mass |
|
|
* ] - another now-obsolete theory of light propagation. |
|
|
|
|
|
==Obsolete astronomical and cosmological theories== |
|
|
* ]/] - obsoleted by ] and ] |
|
|
* ] - obsoleted by ] and ] |
|
|
|
|
|
==Obsolete geographical theories== |
|
|
* ] theory |
|
|
* The ], an ice-free sea once supposed to surround the ] |
|
|
|
|
|
==Obsolete medical theories== |
|
|
* Theory of the ] |
|
|
* ] - medical history - Some say it transformed into ] and ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
==Obsolete branches of enquiry== |
|
|
* ], which led to the development of ] |
|
|
* ], which led to the development of ] |
|
|
* ], was once widely studied but now considered a ] |
|
|
* ], as distinct from ], now considered a ] |
|
|
|
|
|
==Approximate theories== |
|
|
|
|
|
Here are theories that are no longer considered the most complete representation of ], but are still useful in particular domains. For many theories a more complete model is known, but in practical use the coarser approximation provides good results with much less calculation. |
|
|
|
|
|
* ] - The ] and ] threaten to destroy this comfortable world picture. |
|
|
* ] - The possibility of ]s is one of the consequences of ]. |
|
|
* ]s are no longer thought to be indivisible, but are now seen to be ]. |
|
|
* ] disintegrate at ]. |
|
|
* ] theory - This is still used in the coordinate system of ]. |
|
|
* ] - obsoleted by ] and ]. Still useful in ] and physics at either middling (human) scales or where appreciable fractions of the ] need not be considered. |
|
|
* ] of the atom - Allows for exact solution of the ] atom, but larger atoms are not well described. |
|
|
* Newton's ] for the ] of a ] on a body - no longer considered useful at low speeds, though it has found application in ] |
|
|
|
|
|
==Theories whose significance was overstated== |
|
|
<!-- umm.. awkward title --> |
|
|
|
|
|
* ]s - Though temporary connections between land masses sometimes allowed migrations (as when sea levels were lowered during ice ages), the actual splitting of continents by ] has been more important. |
|
|
|
|
|
==See also== |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] - ] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Lists''' |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
*] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Insertion of material is pending.) |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
] |