Revision as of 20:19, 17 August 2023 editGuy Harris (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,474 edits →10.5.9 Sorbet Leopard: We can haz WP:RS?← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:41, 6 November 2023 edit undoJayBeeEll (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers28,152 edits no reason for such aggressive archivingNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| maxarchivesize = 175k | | maxarchivesize = 175k | ||
| minthreadstoarchive = 1 | | minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| minthreadsleft = |
| minthreadsleft = 5 | ||
| counter = 4 | | counter = 4 | ||
| algo = old(365d) | | algo = old(365d) |
Revision as of 19:41, 6 November 2023
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mac OS X Leopard article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
Apple Inc. B‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
10.5.9 Sorbet Leopard
I've heard of an unofficial version of Mac OS X 10.5 called Sorbet Leopard. Maybe include some info about Sorbet Leopard in the article? (Or maybe create a separate article about that subject?) Blacky the Bre (talk) 16:45, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
- A quick Google Search found this page on the Apple wiki on fandom.com, but that's not much of a reliable source, and the references it gives are on Reddit and MacRumors forums, so not exactly reliable sources, either.
- I didn't see any official site for it. There seems to be enough talk about it to indicate that it's not just a hoax (i.e., a big troll by multiple contributors), but not much in the way of details. My guess is that, if it exists, it's probably somebody taking a Leopard release, tweaking the open-source parts from the equivalent Darwin release, and releasing that, but that's just a bit of original research (if a quick guess even qualifies as "research") on my part, so there's no chance that I'd put that in an article.
- I'm not inclined to say anything about it in the article without reliable sources. Guy Harris (talk) 20:18, 17 August 2023 (UTC)