| Revision as of 05:53, 22 November 2023 editThewolfchild (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers51,850 edits →November 2023← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:58, 22 November 2023 edit undoBatong1930 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,973 edits →November 2023: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
| PLEASE.... bring your proposed changes to the talkpages of those articles, instead of slow edit-warring. ] (]) 02:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC) | PLEASE.... bring your proposed changes to the talkpages of those articles, instead of slow edit-warring. ] (]) 02:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC) | ||
| :Yes, as {{u|GoodDay}} requests, you really should go to the talk page of those articles and discuss any changes you wish to make. There is actually a '''policy''' that states "]", meaning that if you to continue making edits to those pages, you do ''not'' have the option of ignoring other editors. Your editing is reaching the point of being ]. (Perhaps an admin might even find you are now past that point which will result in sanctions.)<p>You've already been warned, yet you continue, leaving other editors very little choice but to report you, and leaving an admin very little choice but to block you. - ] 05:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC) | :Yes, as {{u|GoodDay}} requests, you really should go to the talk page of those articles and discuss any changes you wish to make. There is actually a '''policy''' that states "]", meaning that if you to continue making edits to those pages, you do ''not'' have the option of ignoring other editors. Your editing is reaching the point of being ]. (Perhaps an admin might even find you are now past that point which will result in sanctions.)<p>You've already been warned, yet you continue, leaving other editors very little choice but to report you, and leaving an admin very little choice but to block you. - ] 05:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC) | ||
| ::f**k you ] (]) 05:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:58, 22 November 2023
Hello, Batong1930, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages!
Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 02:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Introduction
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Misplaced Pages
- Introduction to navigating Misplaced Pages
- Using the Search engine
- Table of contents
- Directories and indexes
- Department directory
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
- Community Portal
- Join a WikiProject
- Follow Misplaced Pages etiquette
- Practice civility
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Addition of false information to multiple articles
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.
In this edit, you falsely added Maryland, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Minnesota as states that Bush was the only Republican to win reelection without, which is not true. And in this edit, you falsely claimed that the electoral votes were counted on January 8 in 2004 (they were counted on the 6th, as always). Please fact check your edits before submitting, or seek help on the talk page. Best, Cpotisch (talk) 06:47, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
List of presidents of the United States
Howdy. Would you please get a consensus for images changes at List of presidents of the United States's talkpage. Rather then boldly making such changes. GoodDay (talk) 01:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
November 2023
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of presidents of the United States. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - wolf 02:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
PLEASE.... bring your proposed changes to the talkpages of those articles, instead of slow edit-warring. GoodDay (talk) 02:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, as GoodDay requests, you really should go to the talk page of those articles and discuss any changes you wish to make. There is actually a policy that states "Communication is Required", meaning that if you to continue making edits to those pages, you do not have the option of ignoring other editors. Your editing is reaching the point of being disruptive. (Perhaps an admin might even find you are now past that point which will result in sanctions.)
You've already been warned, yet you continue, leaving other editors very little choice but to report you, and leaving an admin very little choice but to block you. - wolf 05:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- f**k you Batong1930 (talk) 05:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)