| Revision as of 21:30, 25 December 2023 editNadVolum (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,123 edits →20000 dead 24 December. Why the fxxk can no one update the obsolete number of casualities in the lead and saying that 70% of the dead are children and women: Uses a template, thoughts?← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:31, 25 December 2023 edit undoNadVolum (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,123 editsm →20000 dead 24 December. Why the fxxk can no one update the obsolete number of casualities in the lead and saying that 70% of the dead are children and women: typoNext edit → | ||
| Line 318: | Line 318: | ||
| 20 December, was 5 days ago. You have to explain here how to edit / change this and WHY do you sabotage these informations. ] from the pro israeli users. ] (]) 05:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC) | 20 December, was 5 days ago. You have to explain here how to edit / change this and WHY do you sabotage these informations. ] from the pro israeli users. ] (]) 05:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
| :The start of the article is a template which is used for a number of articles {{t|2023 Israel–Hamas war casualties}}. I believe this is a wrong thing to do, that the text for articles should stand on their own despite the worry about contradictions and things not being updated in step. The infoboxes can be used for things like this. The text parts should be made easily accessible to |
:The start of the article is a template which is used for a number of articles {{t|2023 Israel–Hamas war casualties}}. I believe this is a wrong thing to do, that the text for articles should stand on their own despite the worry about contradictions and things not being updated in step. The infoboxes can be used for things like this. The text parts should be made easily accessible to editors who may not be expert in the intricacies of what can be done. Anybody else like to give their opinion especially on why this might be a good idea otherwise I feel I ought to just substitute it inline. ] (]) 21:29, 25 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:31, 25 December 2023
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Referencing and citation: criterion not met
Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
It's not a war
Gaza is occupied by Israel. It seems very inappropriate to call a genocidal massacre of an occupied people a 'war'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A458:447B:1:E851:F52A:829A:7CD5 (talk) 21:30, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Fakestinians are the squatters and need to return to their country of origin... Egypt and Jordan. The founder of fakestine was an Egyptian... Yassar Arafat... piss upon him... 47.39.245.47 (talk) 21:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- We may personally question the nature of this conflict but as an encyclopedia it would be inappropriate to rely on independent deduction. Most reliable sources describe it as a war. A significant minority refer to it as a "conflict", and a small minority call it a genocide; we cannot offer them undue weight. Ertal72 (talk) 23:06, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- This is ridiculous. The antisemitism that is pouring out of this page is disgusting. 216.147.121.21 (talk) 06:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Genocides like this usually happen during war (by "like this" I mean in contrast to slower genocides like The Stolen Generation).
- Civil wars exist (the clash between Fatah and Hamas even gets described as a civil war sometimes), so not being a fully independent state doesn't mean it doesn't count as a war. But Israel being an occupying force is relevant to some details of international law.
- I object to defining it as the "Israel-Hamas" war on Misplaced Pages, it is clearly much bigger than that and the "only at war with Hamas" slogan is very much Israeli propaganda, but currently I'm filing that under "choose your battles" unless until someone else brings up an alternative name idea.
- Irtapil (talk) 03:42, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Gaza hasn’t been occupied by Israel since 2005. Drsruli (talk) 05:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Of course it has. Stop the Hasbara. 2A02:8106:203:6F00:1573:EEAF:EC17:AB29 (talk) 11:23, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- I thought they didn't get kicked out till 2006?
- For Gaza it's really more of a "siege" or "blockade" BUT that is a thing that independent nations do to other independent nations?
- The siege on Gaza is so long and intense that it functions like an occupation. Gaza isn't able to act like a normal independent country, and this is also complicated by it being only part of Palestine.
- For example, the UN representative seems to be someone who doesn't fully represent Gaza as such, they seem to be more aligned with Fatah president or Pal. Authority? I thought for ages that there were two regional governments, but it seems there is a Fatah president and a Hamas parliament who are both SUPPOSED to be for all of Palestine, but de facto each only control one side?
- Irtapil (talk) 04:23, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Hostages are not casualties
Casualties, by any definition, are people killed or injured in an accident or conflict. Within the context of the scope of this article, the hostages section could, however, be sub-ordinated under the subheading of "Missing persons", temporarily, since – to all intents and purposes – hostages are essentially a class of missing persons until they are A) released or found alive and well, or B) not. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
- That is incorrect: "missing" and "captured" are indeed by definition casualties. See Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:21, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- Wounded are usually described as "casualties" so why not hostages? I think being taken hostage counts as injurious. Irtapil (talk) 04:24, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Dutch victim in Gaza
One Dutch woman died in Gaza on October 21st, 2023. Reference: https://www.dutchnews.nl/2023/10/dutch-woman-stranded-in-gaza-is-killed-in-bombing-raid/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcel van b (talk • contribs) 11:49, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
- Where does that need to be included in the article? I can add that reference if you aren't able to edit the article, but I need you to be a bit more specific? Tag me with {{re|irtapil}} to make sure i get a notification if you reply. Irtapil (talk) 04:29, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Reference link about casualties is wrong
Cite note 33 to "Trickle of aid to Gaza not enough, U.N. says, as IDF plans more airstrikes" does not contain the information it is supposed to prove. Volganian (talk) 08:01, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- Can you be more specific please, which information doesn't match? Irtapil (talk) 04:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 October 2023
 | This edit request to Casualties of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"Since the war began, the number of dead had exceeded 7,700 people, including 3,000 children, and 19,000 injured." should include a reference to the primary source, which is the Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry (which the current WP source makes clear).
They have a history of using false numbers for propaganda purposes, so presenting these numbers as facts is highly biased.
I suggest to adapt this as following:
"According to the Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry, the number of dead has exceeded 7,700 people, including 3,000 children, and 19,000 injured since the war began."
Also note that the linked WP quote has different numbers (4,651 dead, 1,873 children). As these are propaganda numbers from a terrorist organization, they don't have any real meaning. But we should still reproduce the source correctly. Zukorrom (talk) 16:46, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- The idf is also notorious for lying, you should've been unbiased and requested change for both sides. 41.141.27.102 (talk) 13:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- The IDF isn’t making any specific claims about Gazan casualties yet. Drsruli (talk) 05:53, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ever hear of "Pollywood"... you know the propaganda arm of HAM-ASS... well they shoot more Shiite than an arsehole... that's reality. 47.39.245.47 (talk) 21:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Seriously, are we really going to continue presenting Hamas numbers without qualification (& with a source that gives different numbers)? How is that in any way acceptable? Zukorrom (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 10:47, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- The Numbers by the Gaza Health Ministry have numerous times been confirmed by the UN and independent sources to be accurate. As the names of the dead are published as well this verification is possible and has been used as the official numbers by the UN as well as used as internal intelligence by the US. Jade.128 (talk) 16:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
- https://edition.cnn.com/2023/11/07/world/gaza-death-toll-accuracy-unicef-intl-hnk/index.html
- “UNICEF defends accuracy of Gaza death toll as horror unfolds in ravaged enclave” 176.203.89.130 (talk) 14:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Already done by GreekParadise. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:43, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Balance vs accuracy
The preamble, the second sentence of the article, currently reads "The majority of fatalities have occurred in the Gaza Strip or in Israeli communities near the strip, but casualties have also occurred in ". I can see absolutely why it was written that way but it is unfactual, it should be replaced with "The majority of fatalities have occurred in the Gaza Strip, but fatalities have also occurred in Israeli communities near the strip, in". The majority of fatalities have occurred in the Gaza Strip. The majority of fatalities have not occurred in Israeli communities near the strip. One could perhaps connect the two categories with "and", but definitely not with "or". It is possible that the words were true when written but they are definitely not true today. Fatalities in Israeli communities near the strip total around 3150 if you include everyone killed in that location. I dislike the wording of "in Israeli communities" since some will read that as "in the location", and others will read it it as "among that community", but I haven't changed it. I also dislike having written this edit but the wording of the preamble can't stay as it is. It may be an attempt at balance but it states a factual error. My figure here of "3150" contains the article's "1500" estimate, the present reported "200-250" hostages and the estimated 1400 Hamas invaders - I included them because if you disregard the 1400 then the original statement is even more inaccurate. You may take whatever sourced and reported estimate you like for the number killed in the Gaza Strip, the comparison as it currently stands in the preamble is still false. For reference here, I believe all sourced and reported estimates currently exceed 9000 but I'm happy to be corrected. I also note that the article's title uses "Casualties" while the preamble refers to fatalities. Casualties usually includes both dead and injured while fatalities means dead. The distinction should be observed scrupulously. JohnHarris (talk) 10:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
“Have been killed” or “died”?
The article needs revising in its wording: Israeli civilians “have been killed” while Palestinians “died” or “suffered heavy losses due to military actions”. The article is in dire need of using a common language to describe the same fact: human life loss. There is an inbalance in the length of the sections - hard to believe there is less to report on the vastly larger losses on Palestinian side. Last, the article calls out several “massacres” when referring to geographically isolated heavy civilian loss on one side, while just sums up number with no reference to location and using sanitised military language on the other side. 2A00:23EE:1960:62C3:35F9:709D:597E:BED1 (talk) 18:39, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
It's not sanitized. Gaza Health Ministry statistics at this time do not distinguish combatants and civilians, nor cause of death. The data on the Israeli losses is presently more specific. (As more data becomes available, would expect the section to be greatly enlarged and detailed.) Drsruli (talk) 04:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Foreign deaths table
The table needs a total row too. I know the second two columns will be *unknown* in total. But deaths can be summed up to 249. So the total row will be "249, unknown, unknown". Aminabzz (talk) 23:13, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Sources do not reliably distinguish between civilian and militant casualties in Gaza
This article should include a section informing the reader that the number of civilian casualties vs. militant casualties has not been confirmed by any reliable source and is currently contested. While the Palestinian Health Ministry may report, more-or-less, an accurate number of total casualties (although that also has been called into question), it is generally accepted that they do not distinguish between civilian and militant casualties. https://time.com/6328885/gaza-death-toll-explainer/ Likewise, Israel has acknowledged that it does not have reliable estimates about how many civilians vs. militants have been killed/wounded. https://news.yahoo.com/israeli-ambassador-says-military-t-173333704.html As written, this article reports, as fact, some numbers that are unknowable and may well be false. 160.2.168.216 (talk) 06:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- It could also be added that there are some news outlets (the Guardian and the Times of Israel were the ones I saw) that reported the IDF claiming to have killed "dozens" of Hamas leaders during the aerial bombardment, as of late October/early November. Here https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/08/israeli-airstrikes-on-gaza-have-killed-dozens-of-hamas-commanders-says-idf , and here https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/idf-says-dozens-of-hamas-gunmen-killed-as-soldiers-continue-gaza-ground-op/ were the articles reporting that. Allan4014 (talk) 07:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- The Israeli civilian vs combattant casualties hasn't been confirmed by unbiased investigation either. The article use Israeli figures for those. 2A02:AA1:1048:571D:6882:8FF:FE41:FD87 (talk) 09:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Israeli death toll needs updating
As per the sources below, Israel has now officially revised its death toll. It is no longer 1400 but 1200
Israel lowers its official Oct 7 death toll to 1,200 (deccanherald.com)
Israel revises down October 7 death toll to 1,200 | The Peninsula Qatar
Israel revises death toll from Oct. 7 Hamas attack to 'around 1,200' (msn.com) 185.2.245.26 (talk) 04:14, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Done ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 09:45, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Comparison with civilian death toll in Ukraine
@GordonGlottal: I disagree with many points of your revert explanation. Not notable
for you, at least; I think it's very notable to compare the collateral damage in two major wars that are happening at the same time and which overlap resources. no other foreign politicians quoted on this page
well, I wouldn't really mind detaching that info from the person that brought it up; for me, what matters is to contextualize the casulty figures in this war. not accurate w/r/t Ukrainian death toll
I'm open to clarifying the comparison, i.e. to say that the Ukrainian death toll is a minimum and that Gaza's figure does not distinguish between combatants. At least 10k killed in Mariupol alone
wild and unverified Ukrainian claim, though as implied before, labeling the 9k figure as a minimum would help. UN counts only specific names IDed, which in Gaza would also be minimal
not true; the UN estimate for casualties in Ukraine was based on many types of sources and most of those counted in Gaza's figure are actually identified (see this). Alexiscoutinho (talk) 22:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hey friend. The comparison to Ukraine may be notable if notable sources say so, but a Qatari politician doesn't qualify. I said the quote wasn't notable, not that the comparison wasn't. Sorry if that wasn't clear. "Unverified Ukrainian claim" is exactly my point -- you're trying to compare a number that comes directly from the Gazan Health Ministry with one that the UN independently produced and vouched for after its own investigation, a much more conservative process. The Gazan number is comparable to the Ukrainian internal number, not to the UN Ukraine number. If the UN puts out its own list of Gazan casualties, comparable to its list of Ukrainian civilian casualties, it will certainly only include a small percentage of Gazan claims (note that the UN agencies have a very different relationship to Gaza and past casualty reports for which they vouched were not produced independently from the GMH). It is absolutely impossible for anybody to verify anything about the GMH reporting process other than that they have a color-coded spreadsheet which includes some names -- there is no Gazan census data to provide a baseline, i.e. to show that the ID numbers and names correspond to actual people. Gazan officials initially announced "500 killed or injured" after the hospital explosion. When this was misreported as "500 killed" they just went with it, took advantage, altered future statements instead of trying to correct. Unfortunately all governments in this desperate position cannot be trusted, entirely separate from the general character of their institutions. GordonGlottal (talk) 22:28, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- I also am extremely concerned with your edit summary, which reads "Restored to 'status quo' version (the one stable for weeks)" which is not true. The relevant section was added three days ago with the summary "adding expanded text from main war page 2023 Israel–Hamas war, see page for attribution." These claims/sources only survived a few hours on 2023 Israel-Hamas war and do not belong here either. GordonGlottal (talk) 22:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
which is not true
It's at least partially true. The bulk/core of that citation stayed mostly unchanged in the 2023 Israel–Hamas war page since 27 October (ref access date).These claims/sources only survived a few hours on 2023 Israel-Hamas war
I don't know what you are refering to. Alexiscoutinho (talk) 23:48, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
I said the quote wasn't notable, not that the comparison wasn't
I see 👍.If the UN puts out its own list of Gazan casualties, comparable to its list of Ukrainian civilian casualties, it will certainly only include a small percentage of Gazan claims
The Gazan figures have historically been close and comparable to the UN figures (the article I linked tells this I think). Furthermore, iirc, the UN or OHCHR themselves stated that they considered the Gazan numbers generally reliable, or maybe it was the Palestine authority that said this instead, noting that in the past the reliability of their data wasn't fundamentally contested. Therefore, both numbers share a comparable reliability. Alexiscoutinho (talk) 23:41, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- I also am extremely concerned with your edit summary, which reads "Restored to 'status quo' version (the one stable for weeks)" which is not true. The relevant section was added three days ago with the summary "adding expanded text from main war page 2023 Israel–Hamas war, see page for attribution." These claims/sources only survived a few hours on 2023 Israel-Hamas war and do not belong here either. GordonGlottal (talk) 22:34, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
I will remove this page from my watchlist. Please {{ping}} me if someone wants to continue talking about this. Alexis Coutinho (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Masacre should be used everywhere or nowhere
If masacre is only used on Israeli victims and not on Palestinian the article will not be balanced. 185.183.147.78 (talk) 03:18, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Welcome to the wonderful world of WP:SYSTEMICBIAS on Misplaced Pages. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:42, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Biased or factually incorrect narrative.
When searching Israel hamas death toll on Google the summary result we get from Misplaced Pages is the following:
"On 7 October 2023 more than 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals, mostly civilians were killed and approximately 240 taken hostage during the initial attack on Israel from the Gaza Strip."
It would be fair to switch the paragraph and instead start the article with the second paragraph:
"As of 21 November, over 15,000 Palestinians and Israelis en toto have been killed in the Israel–Hamas war, including 57 journalists (50 Palestinian, 4 Israeli and 3 Lebanese) and over 100 UNRWA aid workers. Over 14,500 Palestinians (the majority of whom were women and children) in the Gaza Strip have been killed according to the Gaza Health Ministry."
Thanks Taison95 (talk) 14:03, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
I agree with the point of switching the first two paragraphs, so that the first paragraph provides the general summary. This would be in keeping with the title of the article.
Also, the current first sentence is misleading. It says "On 7 October 2023, more than 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals, _mostly_ civilians, were killed". Elsewhere, in the article, it says "including 395 IDF soldiers, 10 Shin Bet agents and 59 police officers," (for a total of 464 non-civilians). So, it was 736 civilians and 464 non-civilians. Clearly, the phrase "mostly civilians" is inaccurate. We should either say directly "around 736 civilians killed", or else change the word "mostly" to "a little over two-thirds".
Another inaccurate statement is in the section "Israel: Civilians and soldiers". It says: "As of 1 December, around 1,332 Israelis have been killed", and then it cites
- "Israel revises Hamas attack death toll to 'around 1,200'". Reuters. 2023-11-10"
to document it. The citation says that 1,200 Israelis have been killed, and so the Misplaced Pages article should be updated to use the same number as the citation.
Also in the section "Israel: Civilians and soldiers", the second phrase of the first sentence says "including 395 IDF soldiers, 10 Shin Bet agents and 59 police officers," and then it cites:
- "Fabian, Emanuel. "Authorities name 189 soldiers, 45 police officers killed in 2023 terror clashes". Times of Israel.
If you click on the link, the Times of Israel currently has a title:
- "Authorities name 396 soldiers, 59 police officers killed in Gaza war"
The Misplaced Pages article is correct, here, but the citation should be updated with the current title of Times of Israel, which more or less agrees with the Misplaced Pages article.
Gene (talk) 18:05, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- All of these changes make sense, with the exception of avoiding "mostly". Strictly speaking, "most" would only have to be more than half. Two thirds is a notable majority. It's accurate to describe this portion as most of the total. Ertal72 (talk) 22:42, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 December 2023
 | It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected redirect at Casualties of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |
(Right after footnotes 35 and 35, when discussing the death toll there is a claim that needs a citation: "The Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry does not distinguish between combatant and civilian casualties in its reports, nor between different cause of death, though when examined the death toll of women, children, and elderly lies at about 11,000."
The Israelis have released an estimate that between 5,300 and 6,000 of the deaths include combatants. If this is true and the death toll that is being used in the article is 15,000 it means that the death toll of women, children, and the elderly cannot be at about 11,000. For the sake of accuracy it would mean that about 60% of those killed are civilian casualties and 40% are combatants.
Further, the death toll between the first month and second month of the war has allegedly seen a decrease in civilian casualties from 66% of casualties being civilian to 50% being civilian from October to November.(source: https://breakingdefense.com/2023/12/55-days-of-war-the-israel-gaza-conflict-by-the-numbers/?amp=1)
Text should likely read: "The Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry does not distinguish between civilians and combatants, however current Israeli estimates place combatants at 40% of the death toll and civilians at 60%."
Context for this is lacking in the current written form of the article. Joeshmoe1864 (talk) 01:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
WORK OF FICTION
Does anyone notice a glaring omission from this wiki entry? Clearly its creators wish us to believe that the IDF are the most incompetent army on the planet, because it seems that not a single Hamas fighter (or other 'militant' faction in the strip) has been killed. They provide us with 'unbelievably' detailed information on the number of women and children killed, but no combatants! What people of a certain persuasion on the Middle East like to remind us of is that the numbers coming out of the Health Authority in Gaza (i.e. Hamas) have been largely accurate in previous rounds of fighting (inflated, but within reasonable margins). BUT what they tend to ignore is that analysis carried out after these wars shows, despite the narrative while fighting is going on that it's civilians who are being killed, that Israel has one of the lowest civilian to combatant kill ratios of any army on the planet - somewhere between 1 and 3:1. Now, every civilian death in war is a tragedy, but seeing as the narrative of this (and all other wars in Gaza) is that Israel is targeting civilians, it's actually important to recognise that statistics which omit the number of combatants killed are at best pointless, and at worst propaganda, designed to drive a particular narrative. For example, if you knew that Hamas starts training children in school and welcomes kids from 14 onwards into its fighting ranks, then this puts a whole different perspective on the number of children killed in this conflict. Or if you consider that every Palestinian killed (by the hundreds of Hamas and IJ rockets that fall short in the strip, that are killed by Hamas for allegedly conspiring with Israel, or even who die from natural causes) are included in the figures put out by the Hamas run Health Authority in Gaza (the ONLY source of information cited by the UN, BBC, Sky and all media and charities around the world at this time). Then you may look at those figures differently. For a clear and simple example of this just look at the way news of the supposed Israeli bombing of the Al-Ahli hospital was reported. The Gaza Health Authority reported that 800+ civilians had been killed in the hospital by Israeli aerial bombing. As who was to blame and the number of dead came out within minutes of the explosion this should have raised suspicions, but it didn't. When it was proven to be an IJ rocket that had fallen short, the numbers of those killed were reduced to 100 to 150 in the car park. So, the reason this wiki entry is a work of fiction is that it supports a one-sided narrative by omitting the number of combatants killed, perpetuating Hamas propaganda that Israel targets civilian women and children. Oldfashionedethics (talk) 08:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
By a using a blatantly pro-IDF line-of-reasoning, is not the above comment breaking Misplaced Pages rules about the need to avoid using the site as a platform to push an agenda or make personal statements? (Updated) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.214 (talk) 18:23, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Doesn't say Hamas casualties
The numbers of casualties in Gaza doesn't say how many of them are Hamas militants and how many are civilians. I think there's a huge difference as you'd usually separate the count of soldier death and civilian death 93.172.206.197 (talk) 23:24, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 December 2023
| This edit request to Casualties of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
where is the proof that mostly civilians died on the attack of October 7th? This is propaganda! Because sources say that most deaths we're actually military. And Israel lowered their death toll from 1400 to 1200. Plus another article stating that the IDF killed their own people, because they couldn't differentiate between their people and Hamas fighters. Not to mention the 40 beheaded babies lie, and the rape lies that the MEDIA apologized for spreading because it was baseless. No proof of dead babies that day whatsoever. Only two babies died apparently, but the reason is unknown. Not to mention the release of Israeli hostages, they appear to be safe and well meanwhile the Palestinians are released without fingers, signs of rape, beatings and terror. Not to mention thee bombing of hospitals and UN schools, refugee camps, churches and mosques. SHIFA hospital had the most civilian deaths, and wee still have no proof whatsoever that hamas was there. No tunnels, no nothing! A calendar is all you have to show for killing hundreds of kids in a damn hospital??? A calendar with names of the week? Are you serious??? 212.239.221.240 (talk) 00:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 December 2023 (2)
| This edit request to Casualties of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Following the attack by Palestinian militias, the IDF repelled the aggression. In some cases, there are reports that the IDF, in attacking Palestinian militias, provoked so-called 'friendly fire', without being able to specify the number of casualties. https://electronicintifada.net/content/evidence-israel-killed-its-own-citizens-7-october/41156 81.9.192.168 (talk) 22:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
- I don’t think electronic intifada is a realisable source. ABC quoting the IDF mentions 20 soldiers killed by friendly fire https://abcnews.go.com/amp/International/live-updates/israel-gaza-hamas-health-catastrophe/idf-says-13-soldiers-killed-by-friendly-fire-since-war-began-105575463?id=105538785 2A02:8440:B147:F745:B465:FCD5:BE21:26DE (talk) 15:50, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 (talk) 17:57, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
61% of civilian victims is higher than the AVERAGE of conflicts
In the part describing the 61% civilian casualties analysis, the paragraph says that it is higher than all 20th century conflicts. It is actually higher than the average of conflicts, it was corrected in the source and needs to be corrected in the paragraph as well. 2A02:8440:B147:F745:B465:FCD5:BE21:26DE (talk) 15:45, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 December 2023
| This edit request to Casualties of the 2023 Israel–Hamas war has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I intend to change the table portion of the article, particularly for the row of 'Philippines'. Kidnapped column states 'unknown', but as of November 29, 2023, the 2 people missing were actually kidnapped, and are now accounted for, as shown in this Filipino news article written in English.
Here are some salient quotes from the article: "President Marcos announced that all Filipinos affected by the ongoing war between Israeli forces and Hamas have now all been "accounted for" following the release of Noralyn Babadilla from Gaza on Nov. 29 (Manila time)." (paragraph 1) "On Nov. 25, President Marcos confirmed the release of Filipino national Gelienor “Jimmy” Pacheco, weeks after he was held hostage by the Palestinian militant group Hamas." (paragraph 9) 011wpda (talk) 17:17, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 (talk) 17:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Friendly fire
more information is becoming available about friendly fire on Oct 7th. As the founding event of this war it is important to show at least that it is unknown how many civilian deaths are attributable to hamas forces and how many are attributable to IDF forces by means of infantry crossfire, tank shells and attack helicopters. https://www.ynetnews.com/article/rkjqoobip 2A02:C7C:5ED8:A800:44D0:FD9A:A1FC:F3B1 (talk) 21:22, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Inaccurate number of foreign casualties/hostages
Unfortunately, many of the casualties and hostages taken from foreign countries incurred during the earlier phases of this war are not listed in the pertinent section. Examples of this include:
Moldova - 1 citizen killed. Source: https://radiomoldova.md/p/22734/moldova-condemns-hamas-terrorist-attacks-mourns-loss-of-moldovan-citizen
The Netherlands - 1 citizen killed, 1 hostage taken. Source: https://www.dutchnews.nl/2023/10/dutch-woman-stranded-in-gaza-is-killed-in-bombing-raid/ , Source: https://nltimes.nl/2023/11/30/israeli-dutch-teen-released-hamas-50-days-hostage
The Republic of Georgia - 3 Citizens killed. Two in October, one in November. Sources: https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/georgia-woman-serving-as-israeli-cop-who-defended-country-against-october-7-hamas-attack-stabbed-to-death-by-teen-101699406687184.html , https://agenda.ge/en/news/2023/3757
Sweden - 3 citizens killed. Source: https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/vast/svenska-barn-uppges-ha-dott-i-bombning-av-gaza
Slovakia - 1 citizen killed. Source: https://bnnbreaking.com/breaking-news/israeli-slovak-woman-killed-amid-escalating-israel-hamas-conflict/
Greece - 1 citizen killed. Source: https://greekreporter.com/2023/10/12/girl-thessaloniki-greece-dead-israel/#:~:text=She%2C%20like%20other%20Supernova%20festival,she%20ran%20for%20her%20life.
Czech Republic - 1 killed. Source: https://praguemorning.cz/czech-citizen-among-victims-israel/
Norway - 1 killed. Source: https://bnn.network/breaking-news/war/gaza-conflict-claims-lives-of-norwegian-citizens-stirs-uproar-in-norway/
India - 3 killed. Source: https://www.wionews.com/world/20-year-old-indian-origin-israeli-solider-killed-during-war-with-hamas-654055 , https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/2-israeli-women-security-officers-of-indian-origin-killed-in-hamas-attack-4483654
Tanzania - 2 killed. Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/14/world/middleeast/israel-hamas-hostage-joshua-mollel.html . This is a recent development.
In addition to this, many foreign citizen fatality counts are incorrect. Peru lost 3, not 2, citizens, while the United Kingdom lost 12 rather than 7, for example. Germany lost less than 10, but (presumably) more than 1. Source: https://www.barrons.com/news/foreign-victims-of-deadly-hamas-attack-3ab899d7
Hungary - 3 hostages had been taken. Source: https://www.rferl.org/a/hamas-releases-russian-hostage-israel/32700465.html
Uruguay - 1 citizen taken hostage on Oct. 7. Source: https://en.mercopress.com/2023/10/26/uruguay-doing-its-best-to-help-hamas-held-hostage#google_vignette
Please revise the section as warranted. Goolong4567 (talk) 09:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
References from topics above
- https://www.ynet.co.il/yedioth/article/yokra13696477
- https://breakingdefense.com/2023/12/55-days-of-war-the-israel-gaza-conflict-by-the-numbers/?amp=1)
- https://mb.com.ph/2023/11/28/2nd-ofw-released-from-gaza-all-filipinos-affected-by-israel-hamas-war-now-accounted-for-marcos
Pace of death
"While wartime death tolls will never be exact, experts say that even a conservative reading of the casualty figures reported from Gaza shows that the pace of death during Israel’s campaign has few precedents in this century. People are being killed in Gaza more quickly, they say, than in even the deadliest moments of U.S.-led attacks in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, which were themselves widely criticized by human rights groups." (The New York Times) It might be worth mentioning the almost unprecedented pace of death in the war. Mooonswimmer 15:21, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- I definitely agree. Are you able to edit the article to include that? If not, do you have any suggestions for where it would fit well? Irtapil (talk) 03:11, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- I also think wet need to include the Lancet article prominently. The connection is that what appears to be happening is that the pace of death has exceeded their ability to record and report it. The article itself only says there's no over reporting, we can't add my own suspicions about under reporting of course, I'm just saying why I think it's important to debunk the myth/lie that the death stats are any lower than reported. Irtapil (talk) 03:11, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Mooonswimmer Hold up. You're telling me they're killing people so fast they can't even keep track? For real!? 47.132.127.113 (talk) 05:37, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
ref
- Huynh, Benjamin Q; Chin, Elizabeth T; Spiegel, Paul B (December 2023). "No evidence of inflated mortality reporting from the Gaza Ministry of Health". The Lancet. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02713-7.
{{cite journal}}:|access-date=requires|url=(help); Check|doi=value (help); External link in|doi=
could someone add an archived version of the article (from the citation) at the 'Foreign and dual-national casualties' table at the 'Poland' row?
tvp world got shut down today so all of the tvp world articles are gone, however i am unable to add the archivized version of the article. could someone add it? Maksio3216 (talk) 19:03, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Hamas militants killed
Nothing that can be added to the article but it is pretty easy to put a limit to the number of Hamas fighters killed. We have statistics (some estimated)
Percent of
total deaths population
Male > 14 35 30
Female >14 24 30
Children 34 37
Elderly >60 7 3
The elderly are obviously doing very badly there! Probably there are qute a few women and elderly fighting for Hamas but I'll ignore that here and just consider males above 14. Women and children get protected so they would stand much less chance of being killed than the average civilian man, however lets suppose that civilian men and women have the same chance of being killed. Then at the very most about (35-24)% of the deaths are Hamas fighters which comes to 11%. Personally I think it would be quite a bit less considering the way the Israeli's killed even their own hostages waving white flags but this gives a good upper limit I think. As I said nothing that can be added to the article but it is pretty obvious the Israeli's talking about a 2:1 civilian to militant rate is pure propaganda and they'd be well aware of that. NadVolum (talk) 12:12, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- There's a few extra factors that make a difference, two which might increase the number a bit and another which reduces it.
- Firstly, 20000 to 25000, about 1%, of the population is in the Hamas militants. So with random bombing that gives a 1% minimum being militants.
- Secondly, Many militants might not be counted because they were fighting and so in the front line and it is difficult to get to their bodies. This is the biggest unknown. Maybe 1% extra for this?
- And lastly, The men to women civilian death rate is unknown but from other conflicts the minimum is about 1.3 and it can go very high. In fact it seems quite difficult to get definitive figures for different types of conflicts. Assuming 1.3 as a minimum that would put 1.3*24 = 31% of the male deaths as civilian and the other 4% militant. Make that 5% or bodies not recovered from areas of fighting. 95% civilian deaths is terrible.
- So my best estimates of militant deaths in Gaza is absolute minimum 1%, my best estimate 5%, absolute maximum 12%. So with 20,000 deaths this gives 200, 1000, and 2400 militants. Plus the 1000 killed in the original terrorist attack that gives a total killed of between 1200 and 3400 with my estimate being 2000. NadVolum (talk)
"Footage of bodycam of Israeli elite unit clearing after the Re'im music festival massacre" is unnecessarily graphic and disturbing for an encyclopedic article
The bodycam footage is clearly graphic and potentially disturbing and offensive to many readers. Misplaced Pages's manual of style/images states:
"...a potentially offensive image—one that would be considered vulgar, horrifying, or obscene by typical Misplaced Pages readers—should be included only if it is treated in an encyclopedic manner, i.e. only if its omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternative is available" (https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Images#Offensive_images, "Offensive Images")
The omission of this footage would not, in my opinion, cause the article to be any less informative, relevant, or accurate in an encyclopedic sense. Furthermore, it is disrespectful to victims and their families for this footage to be publicly displayed. As such, I request that this footage be removed from the article. LRVSweet (talk) 16:24, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not particularly concerned about the footage but a straightforward picture rather than a video is really what's needed at the start. I agree the video should be removed and something better put in instead. The other casualties of war articles typically show memorials to the dead rather than the actual war itself. This isn't actually in the lead but about the October 7 massacre, probably a picture of oone of the fields with pictures of the dead on sticks would be appropriate. NadVolum (talk) 17:09, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- What was it there to depict? The aftermath? Irtapil (talk) 03:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
References from topics above
What is going on with the intro?
The first two paragraphs are inaccessible to edit? It makes sense to restrict that, but i can't even view source? What is going on? Irtapil (talk) 23:25, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- I was trying to add this key reference from the Lancet to where it lists the Gaza stats, if it has some esoteric edit protection, can somebody who is able to edit please add that.
- I also just want to view the source of that section so I can copy more up to date info - with references - to the minor pages relating to the conflict.
- Irtapil (talk) 02:58, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Censorship from the pro israeli users, delaying the news of 20000 dead palestinians for after christmas 26 December. Iennes (talk) 05:59, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
20000 dead 24 December. Why the fxxk can no one update the obsolete number of casualities in the lead and saying that 70% of the dead are children and women
This page is neatly highjacked. It is impossible to enter these informations in the lead basing on this BBC source.. congrats. 20 December, was 5 days ago. You have to explain here how to edit / change this and WHY do you sabotage these informations. Censorship from the pro israeli users. Iennes (talk) 05:55, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- The start of the article is a template which is used for a number of articles {{2023 Israel–Hamas war casualties}}. I believe this is a wrong thing to do, that the text for articles should stand on their own despite the worry about contradictions and things not being updated in step. The infoboxes can be used for things like this. The text parts should be made easily accessible to editors who may not be expert in the intricacies of what can be done. Anybody else like to give their opinion especially on why this might be a good idea otherwise I feel I ought to just substitute it inline. NadVolum (talk) 21:29, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class Death articles
- Mid-importance Death articles
- C-Class Disaster management articles
- Mid-importance Disaster management articles
- C-Class Israel-related articles
- Mid-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration articles
- C-Class Lebanon articles
- Low-importance Lebanon articles
- WikiProject Lebanon articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- C-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- C-Class Palestine-related articles
- Mid-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- C-Class Syria articles
- Low-importance Syria articles
- WikiProject Syria articles
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- Unknown-importance Crime-related articles
- C-Class Terrorism articles
- Low-importance Terrorism articles
- Terrorism task force articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- Misplaced Pages extended-confirmed-protected edit requests