| Revision as of 10:36, 13 December 2023 editEst. 2021 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers13,769 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:41, 26 December 2023 edit undoLocke Cole (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,900 editsm trimNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == November 2023 == | |||
| <div class="user-block uw-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for making ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Misplaced Pages's ], then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code>. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 03:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)</div></div> | |||
| <!-- Template:uw-aoablock --> | |||
| :You don't get to treat other editors that way on talkpages. You've been around long enough to know that. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 03:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::So it's OK to lie? Got it. —] • ] • ] 04:03, 2 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::I'm assuming it was the "lie" comment, right? Or was it something else I did? —] • ] • ] 05:37, 5 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :::@] Not sure if you missed this, but before I wade back in I'd like to answer to this before I find myself blocked for not knowing what I did wrong. —] • ] • ] 03:06, 7 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yes, that's what it was. You can disagree with people about things like victims lists without treating other editors who have the temerity to disagree with you like that. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 03:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == The lie == | |||
| Allegedly our sources at {{la|2023 Lewiston shootings}} don't discuss the victims, and yet, in just half an hour of going through the first 8 sources in use ], only 13% of the checked sources (that's 1 out of 8) didn't name any victims, and 25% (that's 2 out of 8) didn't name them all. The other 6 sources (75%) name them all, often in multiple articles. | |||
| # Source: https://apnews.com/article/lewiston-maine-shootings-49da6d06a8b5a15d3b619b3927bc33ff | |||
| ##VS: https://apnews.com/article/maine-shooting-victims-1be7d14e90ef6c91ca23819163d29f3e | |||
| # Source: https://www.sunjournal.com/2023/10/25/multiple-victims-reported-following-shootings-in-lewiston/ | |||
| ##VS: https://www.sunjournal.com/2023/10/26/lives-lost-in-lewiston-theres-nothing-he-wouldnt-do-for-anybody/ | |||
| ##VS: https://www.sunjournal.com/lewiston-mass-killing/ - top of page highlights victims on their landing page for the mass shooting event, also contains links to full obituaries right at the top | |||
| # Source: https://themessenger.com/news/maine-mass-shooting-ruger-sfar-308-battle-rifle | |||
| ##VS: https://themessenger.com/news/lewiston-maine-mass-shooting-victims-18-killed | |||
| ##VS: https://themessenger.com/news/lewiston-mass-shooting-victim-keith-macneir-visiting-maine-celebrate-birthday | |||
| ##VS: https://themessenger.com/news/lewiston-mass-shooting-maine-mechanic-bob-violette-dead | |||
| ##VS: https://themessenger.com/news/beloved-asl-interpreter-helped-deaf-maine-pandemic-lewiston-mass-shooting-victims-joshua-seal | |||
| ##VS: https://themessenger.com/news/father-son-maine-shooting-victims-lewiston-bowling-alley-young | |||
| # Source: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/lewiston-shooting-timeline-maine-attack-rcna122290 | |||
| ##VS: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/live-blog/lewiston-maine-massacre-manhunt-suspect-rcna122436#rcrd23551 | |||
| ##VS: https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/remembering-those-killed-in-the-lewiston-maine-mass-shooting-196584005652 - not only were they also presented in text, the nationally aired nightly news which is also re-broadcast on YouTube and other platforms, included a segment on the victims | |||
| # Source: https://www.reuters.com/article/maine-shooting-idAFKBN31S064 | |||
| ##VS: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/maine-shooting-victims-pipefitter-who-loved-wrestling-father-son-bowling-league-2023-10-27/ - full list with additional bio details | |||
| ##VS: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/maine-shooting-victims-father-son-out-bowling-night-bar-employee-2023-10-26/ - partial list prior to the full list being released by officials | |||
| # Source: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/26/at-least-16-killed-dozens-injured-in-mass-shooting-in-us-state-of-maine | |||
| ##VS: None found | |||
| # Source: https://france24.com/en/live-news/20231027-maine-city-deserted-as-residents-hole-up-during-hunt-for-killer | |||
| ##VS: https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20231027-manhunt-for-maine-mass-shooter-extends-to-second-night - partial victim list | |||
| # Source: https://www.wmtw.com/article/where-robert-card-lewiston-maine-gunman-body-was-found/45672278 | |||
| ##VS: https://www.wmtw.com/article/victims-lewiston-maine-mass-shootings/45656677 | |||
| ##VS: https://www.wmtw.com/article/lewiston-mass-shooting-remembering-victims-stories/45657528 | |||
| I sure hope pointing out lies doesn't result in blocks all the time around here, or we'll never have anyone telling the truth. I was going to go through as many sources as I could before bed, but apparently since I won't be participating for three days, it probably won't matter. <s>Fuck you very much {{ping|Acroterion}}</s>. —] • ] • ] 04:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't understand why you would use the methodology you present above, it's rather confounding. Of the enumerated sources you list above (all which come from the article), zero list the victims. So you gather articles from the same publisher that do list victims to make your point? How is that supposed to be convincing? | |||
| :I guess it's probably not worth trying to understand, as, based on your comments, it sure doesn't appear like you have the intentions of editing in good faith. ] (]) 04:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::On Misplaced Pages, a news "source" is a news outlet, not a news article. All these sources (and more) have given us articles about the dead or mentioned them in broader articles about the shooting. This is ''definitely'' worth understanding and Locke ''probably'' should have been allowed to tell you himself. ] (]) 03:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :::No, that's inaccurate, it's not that simple. Please read WP:Verifiability : | |||
| :::"...the word ''source'' has four related meanings: | |||
| :::* The work itself (the article, book: "That book looks like a useful source for this article.") and works like it ("An obituary can be a useful biographical source", "A recent source is better than an old one") | |||
| :::* The creator of the work (the writer, journalist: "What do we know about that source's reputation?") and people like them ("A medical researcher is a better source than a journalist for.."). | |||
| :::* The publication (for example, the newspaper, journal, magazine: "That source covers the arts.") and publications like them ("A newspaper is not a reliable source for medical facts"). | |||
| :::* The publisher of the work (for example, ]: "That source publishes reference works.") and publishers like them ("An academic publisher is a good source of reference works")." | |||
| :::He would have been allowed to tell me himself, had he not gone out with a "Fuck you very much". ] (]) 04:06, 5 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::::It is that simple, in a ] sense. The creator, the publisher, the publication. I agree one should never tell an admin anything like that. I was once blocked this hard for telling one to **** my ****. I was having a bad day, lashed out and was eventually let back in to apologize and move on. I hope the same happens here. And I hope Cole means it. ] (]) 04:12, 5 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :::::The creator, the publisher, the publication, AND the work itself. ] (]) 04:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Not in ''this'' context, though. ] (]) 04:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::No, that's not how I used the term. ] (]) 04:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::I know. That's how ''he'' used it. Hence the misunderstanding about whether the underlying "lie" is a lie. ] (]) 04:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::I understand that. Does he? We're only guessing at this point, as he let his anger get the best of him before we could find out. ] (]) 04:43, 5 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::If he's reading this, he understands now. It's not complicated and he's not dumb. Anyway, I think we can agree that using more precise words going forward (such as "outlets/publications" and "articles/works") could help make this a substantially less infuriating place. ] (]) 04:53, 5 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::::@] understood my meaning for "sources", and ] is exactly the meaning I was using. But in so far as ] goes, these would all be "publishers" or "publications". I'd continue my work on the sources listed in that revision to make the point, but it doesn't seem like you're accepting that interpretation, so much like ] (where I demonstrated how the overwhelming majority of US mass shooting articles include names of victims in some form or another), it will likely remain incomplete. —] • ] • ] 05:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == November 2023 == | |||
| <div class="user-block blocked-talk-revoked" style="background:#ffe0e0; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height: 40px"> | |||
| ] '''Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an ] has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.''' | |||
| <span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:88%;">( • • • • ]<span class="sysop-show"> • ]</span> • • <span class="sysop-show"> • ] • </span><span class="checkuser-show"> • ], unblock request}}}} checkuser] ()</span>) </span> | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| ---- | |||
| If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the ], then contact administrators by submitting a request to the '']''. <br><small>Please note that there could be appeals to the ] that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.</small><p> ] (]) 04:21, 2 November 2023 (UTC)</p></div><!-- Template:Blocked talk-revoked-notice --> | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Chevrolet (logo).svg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 18:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Misplaced Pages having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. <!-- Template:Db-redundantimage-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> --]<sup>«¦]¦»</sup> 03:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because it appears to have no references. Under ], this ''']''' will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a ] that directly supports material in the article. | |||
| If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see ], or ask at the ]. Once you have provided at least one ], you may remove the {{tl|prod blp/dated}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Johnny Blaze|request that it be undeleted|]}} when you are ready to add one.<!-- Template:ProdwarningBLP --> ] 13:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ] of ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The article ] has been ] because of the following concern: | |||
| <blockquote>'''Article is poorly written, I cant find any other useful information or reliable looking sources on her. I think any sources that can be used for this article are just sources that slipped through the Misplaced Pages Blacklist.'''</blockquote> | |||
| While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be ]. | |||
| You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your ] or on ]. | |||
| Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the ], but other ]es exist. In particular, the ] process can result in deletion without discussion, and ] allows discussion to reach ] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> ] 13:53, 25 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :@] Do us all a favor: if you're gonna fix obvious vandalism, don't leave PROD notifications on talk pages. Especially TWO of them. —] • ] • ] 18:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yes, I understand. ] 19:13, 26 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | ||
Revision as of 06:41, 26 December 2023
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for merger of Template:Userboxbreak
Template:Userboxbreak has been nominated for merging with Template:Ubx-section. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 10:36, 13 December 2023 (UTC)