Revision as of 21:16, 24 March 2007 editRschen7754 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users123,234 edits WP:USRD inactivity notification using AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:30, 31 March 2007 edit undoShadowbot3 (talk | contribs)51,520 editsm Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:Xxpor/Archive1Next edit → | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
Thanks csabi911 | Thanks csabi911 | ||
== eric lyons == | |||
stay away from eric lyons cause it is fact. i researched all of it. do not change for i spent a long time writing and researhcing the facts. | |||
thanks <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 20:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
==U.S. Roads Newsletter Issue #1== | ==U.S. Roads Newsletter Issue #1== |
Revision as of 14:30, 31 March 2007
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 60 days are automatically archived to User talk:Xxpor/Archive1. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
xxpor |see what i've done 02:21, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
IRISH-SCOTS
Dear Sir:
Re the Irish-Scots page, I had made reverts because it has been sanitized and contains inaccuracies.
For instance:
Notable Irish-Scots include James Connolly and comedian Billy Connolly.
This is untrue: Sean Connery does not consider himself Irish, and James Connolly did not consider himself a Scot.
If you look at my list of factual, detailed individuals who qualify as true "Irish-Scots", you will see that the only reason my edits are not being accepted is because the true list contains unsavoury characters that the author of this page, Camillus McIlhenney, chose not to include for reasons you will need to ask him for, as I can but conjecture.
Historical note
The following version is mostly accurate but I added certain facts that were not included, including the origination of the word "Scot" (what it really means in what language). I also include the fact that the word Caledonia is often used/sung by "Scottish" nationalists to describe their homeland.
Answer: It means "thief" or "raider" in Irish, a fact that Mr. McIlhenney, again chose not to mention, as he chose not to include the word Caledonia, which he has told me is obsolete (1st century B.C. and devoid of any importance at all, although the same is not true of "Hibernia", which dates from the same time).
(From current edit which I do not dispute: Around the 5th-6th centuries, the original "Scoti" were people from Ireland who colonized the north of Britain, which was populated by Picti or Picts. The Picts themselves were known to some as "old-Irish", so there is a possibility that they themselves came from Ireland. Ireland was the original Scotland (Scotia), and the Irish the original Scats (Scoti), country and people being known to Roman and medieval Europe under those names. Scotland, serving for centuries as an Irish colony, was known as Lesser or New Scotland (Scotia Minor or Nova), the adjectives only being dropped about the 13th century, when Ireland had come into its present name. The Latin word for Irishman was Scotus. In Gaelic Scotch and Irish are known simply as Gaels of Albin and Gaels of Erin...)
IRISH-SCOTS PAGE
So at the risk of appearing foolish, I very seriously would like to clarify your point and understand its implications as you have laid them out in your brief email to me. Believe me, I am not trying to annoy you, and get a powerful enemy on Misplaced Pages:
- I cannot change anyone else's edits to a page 3 or more times in a 24 hour period, and, allegedly, no one can do that to my edits.
- However, if I add non politically-correct information (even sourced/cited information) that has the result of changing the net overall balance of a WikiPage into validating or backing up my point of view, it cannot stand if anyone complains, and will be regarded as vandalism.
Is this correct?
Thank you for your time.
Your VandalProof Application
Dear Xxpor,
Thank you for applying for VandalProof! (VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact with the new 1.2 version release it has even more power. As such we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that that you don't have enough edits in the main namespace yet. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again in the not too distant future. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof.
AFD Csaba Zvekan
I am new here and you guys are trying to make things very harsh. I have updated some stuff for you to reconsider. It will take me some time for all the innertwined articels so it makes more sense. Just be patiente with me. I need some time to create all that. I f this gets deleted then the rest is in jeopardy. I mean there are also cool users out there that have edited my work to clearify thing . Put me in the right Categories. Adjusted Pictures. Why can't you help us instead make us uncomfortable and insecure .
Thanks csabi911
U.S. Roads Newsletter Issue #1
The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||||||
Volume 1, Issue 1 | 10 February 2007 | About the Newsletter | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 20:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
monobook
Hi Xxpor, I notice you are using my custom monobook. My I direct you to this version, designed for non-admins? It removes admin functions that regular users won't use, and therefore should be faster. It should also be more stable, as I won't test with it. To use it, you need to change all cases of "User:Prodego/monobook.js" in your monobook to User:Prodego/User/monobook.js. In addition, for any version of my files to work, you need to add User:Prodego/User/monobook.css to your monobook.css.
Prodego 00:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
dont try to break my fun ;)
hello... just wanted to know why dont you what me to be on wiki ... i just started the page its not for page ranking or whatever ... i just added the links .. but soon it will be about politics and much more about the truth ... l8terz from yur friend mr pistol —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TEX MrPistol (talk • contribs) 03:21, 15 February 2007 (UTC).
U.S. Roads Newsletter Issue #2
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
Apologies for the late delivery. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
USRD Newsletter - Issue 3
The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter | ||||||||||||||
Volume 1, Issue 3 | 10 March 2007 | About the Newsletter | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
- Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.
Active user verification
Hello, Xxpor. Due to the high number of inactive users at WP:USRD, we are asking that you verify that you are still an active contributor of the project. To do so, please add an asterisk (*) after your name on Misplaced Pages:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/List. Users without one by the next issue in 2 weeks will be removed off the list and off the respective road projects as well. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks. Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 23:06, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
U.S. Roads Inactivity notification
You have been declared an inactive user and your name will be removed from the newsletter distribution and the projects you were a member of. If this is in error, please contact me on my talk page. Do not restore your name to the list. Regards, Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 21:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC)