| Revision as of 22:50, 4 January 2024 editEol Gurgwathren (talk | contribs)38 edits →January 2024: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:52, 4 January 2024 edit undoEol Gurgwathren (talk | contribs)38 edits →January 2024: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ::No, you actually do have a choice, and continuing to revert would risk getting you into trouble for violation of the edit warring policy. Please read that policy carefully. You will note that in the very first section it says that edit warring is banned '''even if the edits you are restoring are justifiable'''. ] (]) 22:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | ::No, you actually do have a choice, and continuing to revert would risk getting you into trouble for violation of the edit warring policy. Please read that policy carefully. You will note that in the very first section it says that edit warring is banned '''even if the edits you are restoring are justifiable'''. ] (]) 22:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :::Engage with I have just said. I undid an unjust reversion first. It is the other users doing this to me rather than engaging with me. They have other options. ] (]) 22:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | :::Engage with I have just said. I undid an unjust reversion first. It is the other users doing this to me rather than engaging with me. They have other options. ] (]) 22:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::::And now I am being harassed by some ultratraditionalist Catholic (Veverve) who has the clear intention of keeping the Liberal Church information surpressed and ambiguous. ] (]) 22:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] Please do not add or change content, as you did at ], without citing a ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> ] (]) 21:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | ] Please do not add or change content, as you did at ], without citing a ]. Please review the guidelines at ] and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> ] (]) 21:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:52, 4 January 2024
January 2024
Hello, I'm Veverve. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Liberal Catholic Church, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 19:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Lots of reliable citations. Please not revert. Rather edit and engage in constructive discussion for this page. It's been reduced to a meaningless blob. Eol Gurgwathren (talk) 22:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi Eol Gurgwathren! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Liberal Catholic Church several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Liberal Catholic Church, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. AntiDionysius (talk) 21:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- I am only reverting because my careful changes we simply reverted in the first place. No discussion or explanation. Until that happens with the work I'be put into it, I have no choice but to revert. Eol Gurgwathren (talk) 22:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- No, you actually do have a choice, and continuing to revert would risk getting you into trouble for violation of the edit warring policy. Please read that policy carefully. You will note that in the very first section it says that edit warring is banned even if the edits you are restoring are justifiable. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Engage with I have just said. I undid an unjust reversion first. It is the other users doing this to me rather than engaging with me. They have other options. Eol Gurgwathren (talk) 22:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- And now I am being harassed by some ultratraditionalist Catholic (Veverve) who has the clear intention of keeping the Liberal Church information surpressed and ambiguous. Eol Gurgwathren (talk) 22:52, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Engage with I have just said. I undid an unjust reversion first. It is the other users doing this to me rather than engaging with me. They have other options. Eol Gurgwathren (talk) 22:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- No, you actually do have a choice, and continuing to revert would risk getting you into trouble for violation of the edit warring policy. Please read that policy carefully. You will note that in the very first section it says that edit warring is banned even if the edits you are restoring are justifiable. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Liberal Catholic Church, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Misplaced Pages:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 21:44, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sources are reliable and approrpiate. Eol Gurgwathren (talk) 22:31, 4 January 2024 (UTC)