Revision as of 05:10, 5 January 2024 view sourceAlok 567 (talk | contribs)62 edits →Digital manipulationTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:58, 5 January 2024 view source Alok 567 (talk | contribs)62 edits →Attempt to humiliate Bhumihars: new sectionTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topicNext edit → | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
Bhumihars were never classified as shudra or vaishya in any of the british caste census. It's clearly a baised page attempting to create false image of Bhumihars ] (]) 05:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC) | Bhumihars were never classified as shudra or vaishya in any of the british caste census. It's clearly a baised page attempting to create false image of Bhumihars ] (]) 05:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
== Attempt to humiliate Bhumihars == | |||
Bhumihars have always been considered as landowning Bramhins, they were never ever considered as shudras as I have British caste census 1831 report , 1901 and 1931 report. I have offical Bramhin books such as Bramhin dwarpan and kanyakubj vanshvali mentioning Bhumihars as Bramhins it's a baseless attempt to humiliate Bhumihars out of jelousy, if the shudra part is not deleted immediately legal action would be taken against the editors ] (]) 05:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:58, 5 January 2024
Skip to table of contents |
The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to South Asian social groups, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bhumihar article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
India Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Archives | |||||||
|
|||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Sir, kindly delete wrong facts about BHUMIHAR caste. The Admin of this page is anti- bhumihar.he is knowing posting fake and artificial story about BHUMIHARS to defame the caste. Bhumihar caste is originated from Brahmin. Bhumihar are pure Brahmin. Kindly delete the false story of hybrids and bhuiyan. It is fully false. Some admin holder of this page are not a bhumihar, they have not any knowledge about BHUMIHAR. Their admin I'd to be blocked.
Wrong facts about BHUMIHARS.
Bhumihars are rulling caste in Bihar, Jharkhand and Purvanchal region of Uttar Pradesh.This caste is holding most of the lands in the area so some people always try to defame Bhumihar caste by spreading wrong and false things about BHUMIHARS. Bhumihars are pure Brahmin and they are good warriors and comes under martial race. Rakesh Kumar Vats (talk) 16:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, so you are here to promote the caste, Rakesh Kumar Vats! Sorry, Misplaced Pages is all about reliable and verifiable sources; articles are not based on original research (WP:OR)! Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 07:26, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- So why you are not providing proof when bhumihar are considered as shudra and in which census bhumihar placed in shudra category . And don't refer book of any author please provide british official census report. In first census they are placed as third category not in shudra category so can you provide british official census in which they placed as shudra 122.171.206.43 (talk) 08:58, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Please provide proof of bhumihar considered shudra in which caste census . They were placed as third ad hoc doesn't mean they were shudra
In which census bhumihar considered as shudra in British census . Can you provide detail . 122.171.206.43 (talk) 08:53, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Please check reference # 20, Democracy against Development: Lower-Caste Politics and Political Modernity in Postcolonial India (University of Chicago Press) page 31; I checked once again, and it clearly says so! We usually avoid primary sources like Census, rather we prefer reliable sources referring to them. Ekdalian (talk) 10:46, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Since We are talking about British Census why can't we refer to the Primary Sources ? and yes i'Ve Read WP:RSPRIMARY but do care to Explain Cause I've Read multiple census Reports myself and didn't Find Mentioning This ? if I am Wrong Pls Care to Rectify me and this Article definately doesn't Seems Neutral or as per WP:NPOV Maybe You Should Rewrite Those Points. Aditya Prakash-080 (talk) 21:06, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Why should I explain further when we have a typically reliable source mentioning the same, in accordance with our policies! Please mention in case there's any violation of our policies, but any user here with the objective of caste promotion would refuse to understand; read WP:SPA! Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 11:16, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
- buddy, no point asking these highly educated folks about editing the article. Bhumihars page is overtaken by leftist group and their editors like sitush, kashmiri, ekdalian etc. Every source they have used is unreliable having manipulated info creating wrong perception about bhumihars. They think they gonna bring some sort of revolution in this digital age ,lol,. GRAI777 (talk) 14:02, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Since We are talking about British Census why can't we refer to the Primary Sources ? and yes i'Ve Read WP:RSPRIMARY but do care to Explain Cause I've Read multiple census Reports myself and didn't Find Mentioning This ? if I am Wrong Pls Care to Rectify me and this Article definately doesn't Seems Neutral or as per WP:NPOV Maybe You Should Rewrite Those Points. Aditya Prakash-080 (talk) 21:06, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 December 2023
When bhumihar was third place in first british census. How author publish bhumihar as shudra category any british official census proof where bhumihar are placed as shudra category . 2nd Economic census of 2023 bihar bhumihar have highest govn job why you not add full report on bhumihar economic census only you give negative thing about bhumihar . According to census bhumihar have highest doctor population.Highest govn job among upper caste in bihar . Why don't you publish that . You should also full economic census report of bihar . If 27% of bhumihar are poor than 25% of bhumihar highest earner in bihar caste survey . You are only publishing negative thing about bhumihar . If you have no bais publish full report not some part of report . And explain when third place of hindu varna system become shudra category .
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
122.167.209.142 (talk) 14:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Shadow311 (talk) 14:59, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 December 2023
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
122.161.76.169 (talk) 12:35, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
However, various studies and opinion of Hindu scholars state that Bhumihars are indeed a high priestly caste, they are Brahmins although it is not clear that where they might fall in, in the Brahmin group.
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 15:24, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- @122.161.76.169: If you continue misusing Edit request templates or keep otherwise disrupting Misplaced Pages, including by incivility and personal attacks as you did two days ago, your whole IP range may be blocked from editing. Consider this a final warning. — kashmīrī 23:28, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Pls provide proof of Bhumihar caste being mentioned as shudra in any of the british caste census, I have british caste census 1831 report which is clearly mentioning Bhumihars under khastriya varna, I have 1901 and 1931 census reports mentioning Bhumihars as Bramhins pls don't spread fake information it's a serious topic
Pls provide proof of Bhumihar caste being mentioned as shudra in any of the caste census Alok 567 (talk) 05:06, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Digital manipulation
Bhumihars were never classified as shudra or vaishya in any of the british caste census. It's clearly a baised page attempting to create false image of Bhumihars Alok 567 (talk) 05:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Attempt to humiliate Bhumihars
Bhumihars have always been considered as landowning Bramhins, they were never ever considered as shudras as I have British caste census 1831 report , 1901 and 1931 report. I have offical Bramhin books such as Bramhin dwarpan and kanyakubj vanshvali mentioning Bhumihars as Bramhins it's a baseless attempt to humiliate Bhumihars out of jelousy, if the shudra part is not deleted immediately legal action would be taken against the editors Alok 567 (talk) 05:58, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Categories: