Misplaced Pages

Dostoevsky and Parricide: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:07, 29 November 2023 editJJMC89 bot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Administrators3,666,242 editsm Moving Category:Patricide in fiction to Category:Fiction about patricide per Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Speedy← Previous edit Revision as of 13:19, 6 January 2024 edit undoToohool (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,716 edits add link to the complete text now that it is public domainNext edit →
Line 23: Line 23:


==External links== ==External links==
* {{in lang|de}}
* *
* *

Revision as of 13:19, 6 January 2024

1928 essay by Sigmund Freud

"Dostoevsky and Parricide" (Template:Lang-de) is an introductory article contributed by Sigmund Freud to a scholarly collection on the 1880 novel The Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor Dostoyevsky. The collection was published in 1928. The article argues that it is no coincidence that some of the greatest works of world literature – including Oedipus Rex, Hamlet, as well as The Brothers Karamazov – all concern parricide, which in Dostoevsky's case Freud links to his epilepsy.

Ernest Jones termed the piece “Freud's last contribution to the psychology of literature and his most brilliant”; Freud himself however called it “this trivial essay. It was written as a favour for someone and written reluctantly”.

Gambling

The second section of Freud's essay turned away from a primary consideration of The Brothers Karamazov to consider the related question of Dostoevsky's gambling. Freud saw gambling as a defiant struggle with Fate (concealing the father figure); the associated guilt was the reason for the gambler's compulsion to lose. As Freud himself put it with reference to Dostoyevsky's wife:

”she had noticed that the one thing which offered any real hope of salvation – his literary production – never went better than when they had lost everything....When his sense of guilt was satisfied by the punishments he had inflicted on himself, the inhibition on his work became less severe.”

See also

References

  1. Ernest Jones, The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud (Penguin 1964) p. 590
  2. Ernest Jones, The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud (Penguin 1964) p. 590
  3. Quoted in J. Halliday/P. Fuller eds., The Psychology of Gambling (1974) p. 105
  4. Otto Fenichel, The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis (1946) p. 372
  5. S. Freud, 'Dostoevsky and Parricide' in J. Halliday/P. Fuller eds., The Psychology of Gambling (1974) p. 170

Further reading

  • F. Dostoevsky, The Gambler (Penguin 1971)
  • Joseph Frank Dostoevsky (197?) Appendix 379-91

External links

Sigmund Freud
Books
Essays
Case studies
Original
concepts
Related
Cultural
depictions
Family


Stub icon

This article about a literary essay or essay collection is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: