Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 10:14, 10 January 2024

September 2021

Hello, I'm Pachu Kannan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Collingwood Football Club have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Pachu Kannan (talk) 10:24, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

February 2022

Hello, I'm Fehufanga. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Elimination Chamber (2022)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 12:50, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Elimination Chamber (2022). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Misplaced Pages articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Elimination Chamber (2022) was changed by Dingo175 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965372 on 2022-02-20T12:52:34+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:52, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

January 2024

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You are persistently adding unsourced information to a BLP in an area deemed a controversial topic. Please note that interviews are often kayfabe. If you revert again I will be obliged to raise this at WP:EWN — Czello 08:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Raise it all you want chump, fact is his contract expired he has not signed with anyone yet, please state your source that he has resigned. Dingo175 (talk) 10:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate he has left the company. Stop falling for kayfabe storylines and discuss it on the talk page. — Czello 10:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)