Misplaced Pages

Talk:Ptolemy Eupator: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:49, 20 April 2018 editLlywrch (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators81,198 edits rating← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:49, 14 January 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,515,705 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Greece}}, {{WikiProject Ancient Egypt}}, {{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome}}. 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|living=no|listas=Eupator, Ptolemy|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=Stub|royalty-work-group=yes|auto=no|listas=Eupator, Ptolemy}} {{WikiProject Biography|royalty-work-group=yes|auto=no}}
{{WikiProject Greece|class=Stub|importance=low|auto=no}} {{WikiProject Greece|importance=low|auto=no}}
{{WikiProject Ancient Egypt| class=Stub| importance=low}} {{WikiProject Ancient Egypt| importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome|class=stub|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome|importance=low}}
}} }}


Latest revision as of 19:49, 14 January 2024

This article is rated Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconBiography: Royalty and Nobility
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.
WikiProject iconGreece Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconAncient Egypt Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:
  • Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

  • Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

  • Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

  • Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Misplaced Pages, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

  • Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Misplaced Pages than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

WikiProject iconClassical Greece and Rome Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Misplaced Pages's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This redirect is a holding action; Ptolemy Eupator deserves an article on his own. Septentrionalis 18:15, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

I've redone the redirect to Ptolemy (disambiguation). I agree that an article is needed for Ptolemy Eupator and Ptolemy Nios/Ptolemy the Son/several other names. But the theories do seem rather complex. Carcharoth 01:37, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
This creates a circular link, which is deprecated. Septentrionalis 03:53, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Oops. I've updated Ptolemy VI Philometor to include a reference to Ptolemy Eupator, and redone the redirect until, as you originally said, Ptolemy Eupator gets his own page. Thanks for pointing out that I'd done a circular link. Carcharoth 11:41, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Further update: I've now given Ptolemy Eupator his own section at Ptolemy VI Philometor, and anchored the redirect to go straight there. Thus all links should now take people to the right place, and not the top of the article, which is about Ptolemy Eupator's father. Carcharoth 15:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Categories: