| Revision as of 01:15, 2 April 2007 editGnixon (talk | contribs)2,977 edits →Block request← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:16, 2 April 2007 edit undoOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits →Block requestNext edit → | ||
| Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
| ==Block request== | ==Block request== | ||
| I've requested that you be blocked from editing at ]. You may wish to comment there. ] 01:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | I've requested that you be blocked from editing at ]. You may wish to comment there. ] 01:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Fine. Whatever. You are a creationist, and now you are using an attempt to silence my personal feeling that you are. You are a most amusing editor. ] 01:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:16, 2 April 2007
|
 Archives |
Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For being bold and because I can't believe you haven't got one yet! Sophia 16:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC) |
References
You are AWESOME!!!
|
The E=mc² Barnstar | |
You might not know me, but I know you. I've seen you editing articles about evolution, and I just wanted to say thank you so much for contributing so much to Evolution articles and reverting vandalism and original research, among other things. I love you! Keep up the good fight! Ķĩřβȳ♥♥♥ŤįɱéØ 17:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
|
Re: discussion and consensus can lead to knowledge:
Absolutely. But I can bet that while you were sitting around having those discussions, you were talking about the *separation column*, and not arguing about how you were going to decide who was going to operate it, and who wasn't going to operate it, and how one person built the column one way but it didn't satisfy everyone and so we had it destroyed (several times), and what the politically correct etiquette of protein fractionation is, and a lengthy explanation of the controversy behind all that etiquette, its history, and all the etiquette mistakes that were ever made in the field of protein fractionation, accompanied by hyper-linked references to the online protein fractionation manual of protocol (also impossibly dense), and peppered with all conceivable kinds of passive-aggressive, nonprofessional and nonacademic drama that didn't get anyone anywhere. Nope, my guess is that you discussed, kept *on topic*, and finally -- *took action* and built the thing, did your work, and moved on. Question: now that I've followed protocol and taken many suggestions to the Evolution Talk page, how does the "consensus" and "progress" process unfold now, resulting in a constructive edit to the article that won't immediately be reverted? THAT is the part of Misplaced Pages protocol I would be interested in witnessing, in action. Thanks,Mandaclair 00:53, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
"Teaching your grandmother to suck eggs" :)
:) Guettarda 06:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
treasure ships
hi there, I responded to your comment on treasure ships —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Intranetusa (talk • contribs) 23:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC).
Block request
I've requested that you be blocked from editing at WP:ANI. You may wish to comment there. Gnixon 01:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Fine. Whatever. You are a creationist, and now you are using an attempt to silence my personal feeling that you are. You are a most amusing editor. Orangemarlin 01:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)