Revision as of 00:33, 20 January 2024 editRupples (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,408 edits →Redirect to Estela (Póvoa de Varzim): ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:32, 20 January 2024 edit undoSimonP (talk | contribs)Administrators113,127 edits →Redirect to Estela (Póvoa de Varzim): ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::That seems like an issue for the Estela page. Teso is listed there as a locality. At minimum we can . - ] (]) 00:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC) | ::That seems like an issue for the Estela page. Teso is listed there as a locality. At minimum we can . - ] (]) 00:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
:::Agree, in the absence of locating better sources Google Maps seems the only usable one. When I looked at this for the recent AfD the localities within the ] parish are listed on the official website for the parish; Estela parish website doesn't do so. I'm finding similar problems with Indian hamlets/villages where the only source is again Google Map boundaries and I wasn't sure it could be used to say whether a smaller named populated place is inside a the marked boundaries of a census village; it's similar to this situation, except the smaller village, unlike here, does have content. ] (]) 00:33, 20 January 2024 (UTC) | :::Agree, in the absence of locating better sources Google Maps seems the only usable one. When I looked at this for the recent AfD the localities within the ] parish are listed on the official website for the parish; Estela parish website doesn't do so. I'm finding similar problems with Indian hamlets/villages where the only source is again Google Map boundaries and I wasn't sure it could be used to say whether a smaller named populated place is inside a the marked boundaries of a census village; it's similar to this situation, except the smaller village, unlike here, does have content. ] (]) 00:33, 20 January 2024 (UTC) | ||
::::Yes, I've run into similar issues with Indian villages (compounded by each having many different English spellings). There is probably some gazette out there that lists all Portuguese geographical areas, but I have not been able to find on. | |||
::::In this case my argument is more than this article has 14 words, and none of them say anything not in the parent article. Regardless of the referencing issues, no reader needs this to be its own article right now. - ] (]) 01:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:32, 20 January 2024
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 January 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This page was proposed for deletion by Tooncool64 (talk · contribs) on 5 January 2024. |
Portugal Redirect‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cities Redirect‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Redirect to Estela (Póvoa de Varzim)
There is zero info in this article not on the parent page. If this page had any info it would be a fine article, but it does not. Until their is actual content for an article it should be a redirect. - SimonP (talk) 23:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- Is there a source citing it's in Estela? Rupples (talk) 23:56, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- That seems like an issue for the Estela page. Teso is listed there as a locality. At minimum we can cite Google Maps. - SimonP (talk) 00:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, in the absence of locating better sources Google Maps seems the only usable one. When I looked at this for the recent AfD the localities within the Balazar parish are listed on the official website for the parish; Estela parish website doesn't do so. I'm finding similar problems with Indian hamlets/villages where the only source is again Google Map boundaries and I wasn't sure it could be used to say whether a smaller named populated place is inside a the marked boundaries of a census village; it's similar to this situation, except the smaller village, unlike here, does have content. Rupples (talk) 00:33, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I've run into similar issues with Indian villages (compounded by each having many different English spellings). There is probably some gazette out there that lists all Portuguese geographical areas, but I have not been able to find on.
- In this case my argument is more than this article has 14 words, and none of them say anything not in the parent article. Regardless of the referencing issues, no reader needs this to be its own article right now. - SimonP (talk) 01:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, in the absence of locating better sources Google Maps seems the only usable one. When I looked at this for the recent AfD the localities within the Balazar parish are listed on the official website for the parish; Estela parish website doesn't do so. I'm finding similar problems with Indian hamlets/villages where the only source is again Google Map boundaries and I wasn't sure it could be used to say whether a smaller named populated place is inside a the marked boundaries of a census village; it's similar to this situation, except the smaller village, unlike here, does have content. Rupples (talk) 00:33, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- That seems like an issue for the Estela page. Teso is listed there as a locality. At minimum we can cite Google Maps. - SimonP (talk) 00:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect-Class Portugal pages
- Low-importance Portugal articles
- WikiProject Portugal articles
- Misplaced Pages requested maps in Portugal
- Redirect-Class WikiProject Cities pages
- WikiProject Cities articles needing attention
- WikiProject Cities articles needing infoboxes
- Misplaced Pages requested maps
- Misplaced Pages requested photographs in Portugal
- Misplaced Pages requested images of cities
- All WikiProject Cities pages