Misplaced Pages

Talk:Naked short selling: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:02, 1 November 2023 edit50.234.188.27 (talk) Cited statement not in reference: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit Revision as of 15:38, 24 January 2024 edit undoGoingBatty (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers636,649 editsm top: General fixes per WP:Talk page layoutTag: AWBNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}} {{Talk header}}
{{Not a forum}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=
{{WikiProject Business|class=B|importance=Mid}} {{WikiProject Business|class=B|importance=Mid}}


Line 13: Line 14:
| org= ] | org= ]
}} }}

{{Off topic warning}}
{{archive basics|counter=9}} {{archive basics|counter=9}}
{{Archives}} {{Archives}}

Revision as of 15:38, 24 January 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Naked short selling article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Naked short selling. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Naked short selling at the Reference desk.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconBusiness Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconFinance & Investment Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by a media organization:

Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8

I feel like this is relevant to some current events...

I have nothing more to say. Ellenor2000 (talk) 23:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Cited statement not in reference

Citation 2, used for the statement The oldest documented example of a naked short in securities trading appears to be a 1609 maneuver against the Dutch East India Company by the Dutch trader Isaac Le Maire does not state what is claimed. The sole paragraph in the source to touch on it doesn't mention naked shorting. The paragraph in the source is Short-selling runs deep in financial history. Perhaps the first case dates to 1609 when the Dutch trader, Isaac Le Maire, targeted the shares of the shipping company Vereenigde Oostindische Compagnie (the Dutch East India Company). VOC was the first multinational corporation in history and had broad powers. Nonetheless, Le Maire, concerned about threats of attack by English ships, sold VOC’s shares short. After learning about Le Maire’s tactics, the stock exchange governing VOC’s trading banned short-selling (although the ban was later revoked)

Im going to remove the statement from the article but posting notice here so if anyone finds a source that actually backs up the statement they can re-add it. 50.234.188.27 (talk) 13:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Categories: