| Revision as of 22:00, 20 August 2004 editVioletriga (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users37,361 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:10, 28 August 2004 edit undoVioletriga (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users37,361 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Say anything you want – I won't edit any comments but I may reformat them to a nice thread format if it looks untidy (I'm a ])''' | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | ---- | ||
| ⚫ | ==Is there anybody out there?== | ||
| Yep, me. I'm aware of the ] problem. Unfortunately, I know too little about it to properly write it up from scratch. Do you have any information I could fall back on? Nice review articles from good ]s are always welcome. ] | ] 16:11, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC) | Yep, me. I'm aware of the ] problem. Unfortunately, I know too little about it to properly write it up from scratch. Do you have any information I could fall back on? Nice review articles from good ]s are always welcome. ] | ] 16:11, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC) | ||
| ==Lists of fictional animals== | |||
| ⚫ | ---- | ||
| Why delete links to ]? There has to be a pretty good reason for removing links in Misplaced Pages, which is all about links. ] 21:03, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) | Why delete links to ]? There has to be a pretty good reason for removing links in Misplaced Pages, which is all about links. ] 21:03, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) | ||
| :Because the only content of that article is a failed redirect to ] and all the relevant articles are in that category anyway. ] 21:09, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) | :Because the only content of that article is a failed redirect to ] and all the relevant articles are in that category anyway. ] 21:09, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) | ||
| ::Works for me. The words "superfluous and miscoded" in the comment would have warned me off my question. ] 21:57, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :::You're right - I did mention it in an edit on the main article itself but should have done it on each altered article. ] 22:00, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) | |||
| :You're right - I did mention it in an edit on the main article itself but should have done it on each altered article. ] 22:00, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:10, 28 August 2004
Say anything you want – I won't edit any comments but I may reformat them to a nice thread format if it looks untidy (I'm a virgo)
Is there anybody out there?
Yep, me. I'm aware of the eclampsia problem. Unfortunately, I know too little about it to properly write it up from scratch. Do you have any information I could fall back on? Nice review articles from good medical journals are always welcome. JFW | T@lk 16:11, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Lists of fictional animals
Why delete links to Lists of fictional animals? There has to be a pretty good reason for removing links in Misplaced Pages, which is all about links. Ortolan88 21:03, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Because the only content of that article is a failed redirect to Category:Lists of fictional animals and all the relevant articles are in that category anyway. violet/riga 21:09, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Works for me. The words "superfluous and miscoded" in the comment would have warned me off my question. Ortolan88 21:57, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- You're right - I did mention it in an edit on the main article itself but should have done it on each altered article. violet/riga 22:00, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Works for me. The words "superfluous and miscoded" in the comment would have warned me off my question. Ortolan88 21:57, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)