Misplaced Pages

Talk:Gender: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:47, 9 February 2024 editZilch-nada (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,493 edits Opening sentence - are "man" and "woman" genders?: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 18:17, 9 February 2024 edit undoBeccaynr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users29,602 edits Opening sentence - are "man" and "woman" genders?: Reply re: links to past discussionsTag: ReplyNext edit →
Line 94: Line 94:


:I.e., why does the sentence employ "man" and "woman" instead of "male" and "female", which are the terms generally used regarding the gender binary? ] (]) 14:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC) :I.e., why does the sentence employ "man" and "woman" instead of "male" and "female", which are the terms generally used regarding the gender binary? ] (]) 14:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
::You may wish to review past discussions of the lead, which are collected and linked here: ]. Thank you, ] (]) 18:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:17, 9 February 2024

    This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gender article.
    This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
    Article policies
    Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
    Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
    This  level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
    It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
    WikiProject iconLGBTQ+ studies
    WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Misplaced Pages. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies
    WikiProject iconGender studies Top‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
    TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
    To-do list:

    Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
    WikiProject iconSociology Top‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
    TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
    WikiProject iconSexology and sexuality Top‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
    TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
    WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Ethics / Social and political Mid‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Misplaced Pages.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
    MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
    Associated task forces:
    Taskforce icon
    Ethics
    Taskforce icon
    Social and political philosophy
    This page is not a forum for general discussion about Gender. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Gender at the Reference desk.
    Former good articleGender was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
    Article milestones
    DateProcessResult
    March 12, 2006Good article nomineeListed
    July 7, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
    Current status: Delisted good article
    This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies/Gender and International Affairs (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
    The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

    Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

    Section sizes
    Section size for Gender (34 sections)
    Section name Byte
    count
    Section
    total
    (Top) 13,414 13,414
    Etymology and usage 27 19,384
    Derivation 2,222 2,222
    History of the concept 8,676 17,135
    As a grammatical category 1,141 1,141
    As distinct from sex 7,318 7,318
    Gender identity and gender roles 7,027 29,622
    Social assignment and gender fluidity 11,166 11,166
    Societal categories 1,617 9,116
    Non-binary and third genders 7,499 7,499
    Measurement of gender identity 2,313 2,313
    Biological factors and views 4,684 10,710
    Non-human animals 6,026 6,026
    Feminist theory and gender studies 11,950 19,149
    Social construction of gender hypotheses 7,199 7,199
    Psychology and sociology 12,035 12,035
    Gender as biopsychosocial 2,850 2,850
    Gender and society 26 40,450
    Languages 7,407 7,407
    Legal status 160 3,705
    Transgender people 496 496
    Intersex people 2,039 2,039
    Non-binary and third genders 1,010 1,010
    Science 2,643 2,643
    Religion 5,695 5,695
    Poverty 4,522 4,522
    General strain theory 2,963 2,963
    Economic development 1,232 1,232
    Climate change 4,912 4,912
    Social media 7,345 7,345
    See also 308 308
    References 30 30
    Bibliography 729 729
    External links 512 512
    Total 149,193 149,193

    This article was nominated for merging with Sex and gender distinction in the past. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was to not merge.

    Citation Suggested

    The rise of criticism against the WID approach led to the emergence of a new theory, that of Women and Development (WAD). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhum.group2 (talkcontribs) 17 May 2019 (UTC)

    References

    1. Muyoyeta, Lucy (2004). Women, Gender and Development (PDF). Zambia: Women for Change. ISBN 095351367X.

    Citation suggested

    In contemporary times, most literature and institutions that are concerned with women's role in development incorporate a GAD perspective, with the United Nations taking the lead of mainstreaming the GAD approach through its system and development policies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhum.group2 (talkcontribs) 17 May 2019 (UTC)

    References

    1. United Nations. Office of the Special Adviser on Gender Issues, & Advancement of Women (2002). Gender Mainstreaming an Overview (PDF). New York: United Nations Publications.

    Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Culture

    This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2023 and 18 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jenjmo (article contribs).

    — Assignment last updated by Jenjmo (talk) 17:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

    Irrelevant image; suggesting deletion or alteration

    File:SF gender symbols.png#globalusage

    This image, used under the Social Categories heading, is irrelevant. The Male / Female / Transgender symbols in the first column are widely used, however the remaining symbols in the second and third column are "Made up symbols for gender / sex in SF articles", in the words of the image's creator.

    These made-up symbols are not adding anything of value to the page, and are only confusing/misleading.

    Proposed solutions:

    a) delete the image entirely

    b) crop the image so only the Male / Female / Transgender symbols are present

    c) replace the image with a different chart (perhaps something like this https://img.freepik.com/free-vector/gender-symbols-set-outline-black-signs-isolated-white-background-simple-illustration_171739-336.jpg?size=626&ext=jpg )

    d) replace the image with a collection of pride flags that represent various genders (i.e. transgender, demiboy, demigirl, non-binary, agender, etc)

    I think (a) or (b) or (d) are most suitable.

    (c) has the issue where gender symbols (in my lived experience as a trans person) do not have common community agreement and are not frequently used.

    (d) is a better solution, since the flags have community support and are well-understood icons.

    (a) is simple and easy solution. Creature-of-cozy (talk) 17:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

    I think you are right that there is something off here. Not that there is anything intrinsically wrong with the image itself, but that it is confusing in this context. It is slightly different versions of the same four symbols in three variants but a reader might not realise that. Your option C has a mix of gender and sexuality symbols and so that would be confusing as well. Option D, pride flags, is not so good as not all genders have pride flags (and we don't want to encourage trolls to add their dimwitted monochrome cis or straight flags). So that leaves A and B. Just removing it would definitely be a valid option but something like B would be better. Even better still, I think we already have the image we need on the Gender symbol article which we can reuse.
    I am going to swap that one in, because I think that is clearly a step in the right direction, but that doesn't have to be the last word on this. If anybody has any further ideas then please say. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:51, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
    Well, that wasn't as easy as I had hoped. The image wasn't an image at all. It was symbols in an infobox. I have transplanted it as best I can. Maybe it shouldn't be an infobox? If so, does anybody know how to changeit into something more appropriate while keeping the contents as they are? --DanielRigal (talk) 19:19, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

    Opening sentence - are "man" and "woman" genders?

    The opening sentence isn't quite clear: "social, psychological, cultural and behavioral aspects of being a man, woman, or other gender identity."; does this therefore imply that being a man or woman is a gender?. It seems very ambiguous to imply that men and women are genders outright, given that this is in the first sentence in an article entitled simply "gender". Zilch-nada (talk) 14:45, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

    I.e., why does the sentence employ "man" and "woman" instead of "male" and "female", which are the terms generally used regarding the gender binary? Zilch-nada (talk) 14:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
    You may wish to review past discussions of the lead, which are collected and linked here: Talk:Gender/Archive 11#Past discussions of lead. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 18:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
    Categories: