Misplaced Pages

Talk:Connecticut Natural Gas: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:49, 16 May 2020 editHorse Eye Jack (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,961 edits →undue← Previous edit Latest revision as of 02:45, 13 February 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,318,830 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Stub" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Connecticut}}, {{WikiProject Companies}}, {{WikiProject Energy}}.Tag: Talk banner shell conversion 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{talk header}} {{talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Stub|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Connecticut|class=Stub|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Connecticut|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Companies|class=Stub|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Companies|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Energy|class=Stub|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Energy|importance=Low}}
}} }}


Latest revision as of 02:45, 13 February 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Connecticut Natural Gas article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article is rated Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconConnecticut Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconCompanies Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconEnergy Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled header

This article originally redirected to UIL Holdings Corporation, this company's corporate parent. This redirect has been removed and a unique article has been created for Connecticut Natural Gas. Disclosure of conflict-of-interest editing: Please note that this editor is an employee of UIL Holdings Corporation. I am adding this information with authorization of my company, in the interest of creating a complete and factually accurate article. I am attempting to abide by the Misplaced Pages Terms of Use, and to remain neutral in tone; however, I expect that the Misplaced Pages community will help to ensure that this page remains up-to-date, balanced and complete.Edwardjcrowder (talk) 15:56, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

undue

Seems a bit like that (especially with the random mention of Tomasso Group). Also, I added some info about CNG's union. Further reading for future reference: here. –MJL ‐Talk‐ 14:52, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

I don’t think we have a weight issue, we just have an article whose core is so anemic and under sourced that any paragraph sized addition is going to look disproportionate. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 15:49, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Categories: