Talk:The Revolution Will Not Be Televised (film): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:52, 23 March 2022 editMalnadachBot (talk \| contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 11:30, 14 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk \| contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,097 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion
Line 15:		Line 15:
	\|maindate=18 March 2011		\|maindate=18 March 2011
	}}		}}
		⚫	{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=FA\|listas=Revolution Will Not Be Televised (film), The\|
	{{WikiProjectBannerShell\|1=
	{{WikiProject Venezuela~~\|class=FA~~\|importance=mid}}		{{WikiProject Venezuela\|importance=mid}}
	{{WikiProject Film~~\|class=FA~~\|Documentary-film-task-force=yes~~\|listas=Revolution Will Not Be Televised (film), The~~\|core=yes}}		{{WikiProject Film\|Documentary-film-task-force=yes\|core=yes}}
	{{WikiProject Ireland~~\|class=FA~~\|importance=mid\|attention= \|peer-review= \|old-peer-review= \|image-needed= \|needs-infobox=		{{WikiProject Ireland\|importance=mid\|attention= \|peer-review= \|old-peer-review= \|image-needed= \|needs-infobox=
			}}
⚫	\|listas=Revolution Will Not Be Televised (film), The}}
	}}		}}
	{{CotM\|project=Venezuela\|year=2010\|month=3}}		{{CotM\|project=Venezuela\|year=2010\|month=3}}

Latest revision as of 11:30, 14 February 2024

The Revolution Will Not Be Televised (film) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 18, 2011.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 30, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed
May 18, 2010	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Venezuela Mid‑importance

	Venezuela portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Venezuela, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Venezuela on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VenezuelaWikipedia:WikiProject VenezuelaTemplate:WikiProject VenezuelaVenezuela
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Documentary / Core

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is on the project's core list.

Ireland Mid‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This was a Collaboration of the Month of WikiProject Venezuela, for March 2010.
Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Misplaced Pages article.

Archives

1 2

Source

Wayne, Mike; O'Neill, Deirdre (2011). "Form, Politics and Culture: A Case Study of The Take, The Revolution Will Not Be Televised and Listen to Venezuela". In Kapur, Jyotsna; Wagner, Keith B (eds.). Neoliberalism and Global Cinema: Capital, Culture, and Marxist Critique. Routledge Advances in Film Studies. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-88905-6.

Found a possible source to use. Erik (talk | contribs) 21:32, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

I may be wrong. This page's "Contents" tab only has a chapter mentioning Listen to Venezuela. I found the above source through WorldCat.org, so it's possible it was outdated. Erik (talk | contribs) 21:38, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

I think you might be right; the chapter in question (a reproduction of an article from Film International) only namechecks Revolution once. It may be that the editors decided not to include whatever it was going to be, or a simple mistake, but I'll try to look further. Steve 22:16, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Congratulations

Congrats to the editors who got this worked up to FA (and AOTD) status. I was living in Venezuela during the coup and, long ago, contributed to some of the early articles dealing with it -- including this one. Nice to see where this ended up. Great work. 98.162.244.83 (talk) 01:33, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

FASCIST PROPAGANDA!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.210.220.126 (talk) 15:49, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

True, it's a shame Misplaced Pages's bias pushing this kind of propaganda of Hugo Chavez and his totalitarian regimen in their first page. Congratulations to those editors responsible, they are making major advances to make Misplaced Pages another feud for the left-wing sectarianism. 81.60.184.222 (talk) 22:34, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi. If you took the time to read the article, you'll find—I hope—that it presents only solidly-cited information about this film's production, without offering support to Chavez; indeed, large parts of the article feature criticism of the filmmakers (while at the same time quite rightly presenting their rebuttals to the charges levelled against them). Please don't take the appearance of an article about a subject as an endorsement of it; by that measure, would you take Adolf Hitler's appearance on the main page as an endorsement of Nazism? Yes, I went there. Steve 22:55, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Film title

Correct me if I'm wrong (it's a long article!) but I don't see any links to the poem and 1970 recording by Gil Scott-Heron - article here - from which the film took its title. This surely needs to be added. Ghmyrtle (talk) 07:27, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

I thought so too. But remembering the Last Poets from its original release, having observed it grow into a trivialized meme in bourgeois culture, ... . Also don't see the point of showing the Film Forum marquee with nothing on it related to this. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 08:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi. The Film Forum image is ... well, it's partially decorative, and doesn't add much of note to the article content. However, what it does do is break up the giant wall o' text that the article could easily become (which often puts off readers' getting to the end of large articles like this one), so I'm content to let it stay. In other news, I added a very brief note about the origins of the name. All the best, Steve 09:36, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Acknowledgement - Gil Scott Herron "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised".1970 ArnoldRLee (talk) 16:17, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Already done - see above. Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:39, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

There should be some acknowledgement, even if only in a hatnote, that the title is directly taken from a popular protest song, and that song should be linked. There is no substance in the argument that the song is "a trivialized meme in bourgeois culture" such that the film title be presented as entirely original when it is not. -67.161.54.63 (talk) 18:38, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi. In case you missed it, I added a note about the origins of the film's name. However, to comment on its significance without a citation to a reliable secondary source would be considered original research, which the best articles strive to eliminate. If you can find such a source that comments more directly on this, I'm sure it'd be considered. All the best, Steve 19:10, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

It seems that on the one hand you are asking for a source, while on the other you yourself added a footnote with such a source. If the source is good enough for a footnote it should be good enough for a hatnote. Placing too high a bar for entry seems sort of like claiming that the title of the film, The Revolution Will Not Be Televised, does not owe its origin to the song The Revolution Will Not Be Televised, when the connection is plain. -67.161.54.63 (talk) 21:38, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

No, he is asking for a citation that the film was named after or inspired by the name of the poem. We don't seem to have that. It appears that what you want is a dab link to other uses of the term; I have added that correctly. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:50, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

And I disagree even with the hatnote. The advice of WP:NAMB is that for an article such as this, a hatnote is unsuitable, because the article title is already disambiguated. But it's a small issue, and if I'm honest I don't especially care one way or the other. :-) Steve 22:02, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Ah, I see-- I wasn't aware of NAMB. In that case, I agree we don't need it, but then having it doesn't seem to do much harm either. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

On this edit, I agree, those are unuseful overlinking, and I would have removed it myself, but don't want to pass 3RR. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:10, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Revolution Will Not Be Televised (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Revolution Will Not Be Televised (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Categories: