Revision as of 11:55, 4 November 2021 edit2601:14c:4080:45e0:192c:a0f5:499:1910 (talk) →academic view: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:20, 14 February 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,012,012 edits Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)Tag: Talk banner shell conversionNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} | {{Talk header}} | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start| | |||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | |||
{{WikiProject Business |
{{WikiProject Business|importance=Mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject Economics |
{{WikiProject Economics|importance=Low}} | ||
{{WikiProject Globalization |
{{WikiProject Globalization|importance=Mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject Philosophy|ethics=yes |
{{WikiProject Philosophy|ethics=yes|importance=Low}} | ||
{{WikiProject Trade |
{{WikiProject Trade|importance=Mid}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Race to the bottom/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} | {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis|archiveprefix=Talk:Race to the bottom/Archives/|format=Y|age=26297|index=yes|archivebox=yes|box-advert=yes}} |
Revision as of 17:20, 14 February 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Race to the bottom article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
This is not an example of "race to the bottom", it is NOT the definition.
The entire article is predicated on an article called "racing to the bottom". This is a mistake, because that article may be an *example* of race to the bottom, but it is not the definition.
The term "race to the bottom" has always included inter- and intra-company decisions that among many things involve the decisions to lower quality in order to compete in volume. It's actually a fairly economically terrifying dynamic playing out today, and this article is only confusing people. 𝓦𝓲𝓴𝓲𝓹𝓮𝓭𝓲𝓪𝓘𝓼𝓝𝓸𝓽𝓟𝓮𝓮𝓻𝓡𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓮𝔀𝓮𝓭-𝓟𝓮𝓮𝓻𝓡𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓮𝔀𝓮𝓭𝓜𝓮𝓪𝓷𝓼𝓡𝓮𝓿𝓲𝓮𝔀𝓮𝓭𝓑𝔂𝓟𝓮𝓮𝓻𝓼𝓞𝓷𝓵𝔂 (talk) 12:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
academic view
This article seems overly academic, and more focused on price competition per se. The aspect that is NOT discussed (in a skim read at least) is the related loss in QUALITY, where products get streamlined to cut costs.
Example I just ran into: mens web belts, where there is no longer a leather strip with punched holes to mate up with the fastener. They all now assume you'll poke the fastener tongue (right word?) thru the belt itself. I can't find anybody selling the earlier version, which is the quality I want.
Which brings to mind an associated aspect: the stores (physical and online) all carry the same bottom level crap, there seems to be little quality differentiation (brand names for extra $ but little variation in actual product).
2601:14C:4080:45E0:192C:A0F5:499:1910 (talk) 11:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC) Peter Welcher
Categories:- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class Economics articles
- Low-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- Start-Class Globalization articles
- Mid-importance Globalization articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class ethics articles
- Low-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles
- Start-Class Trade articles
- Mid-importance Trade articles
- WikiProject Trade articles