Revision as of 20:56, 6 April 2007 editNeoFreak (talk | contribs)3,402 edits 24 hours← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:09, 6 April 2007 edit undoTaxwoman (talk | contribs)895 edits →24 hours: Please do not threaten to violate WP:Point.Next edit → | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
The editor(s) so interested in keeping this ] article have 24 hours to produce ''a single reliable source''. That is all I want. After that it gets merged back into the "Garment Fetishism" article. ] 20:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | The editor(s) so interested in keeping this ] article have 24 hours to produce ''a single reliable source''. That is all I want. After that it gets merged back into the "Garment Fetishism" article. ] 20:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Please do not threaten to violate ].--] 21:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:09, 6 April 2007
LGBTQ+ studies Start‑class | |||||||
|
WHAT?!!!!!
Why would you have a picture like this on an article were anyone could visit? It seems to me that the picture in this article shows a little too much skin. Some child under the age of 16 could go on the article if he wanted to. 12.73.120.203 20:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know where you're writing from, but in London you can see more skin than that whenever the weather gets warm enough. --Taxwoman 09:07, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
wikipedia is not censored and children are not harmed by sexual images when provided within an academic context, and dont you remember being a kid, whats the first word you looked up in the dictionary "sex" "bitch" anf "fuck" i bet, in junior high whatd you look up in your biology book "breasts" "penis" "sex" kids can find sex anywhere they want especially the internet and if they want to get off there are much more exiting sites to choose from than an encyclopedia just type in "sex" "blowjob" or "fucking" on google im sure your children haveQrc2006 21:25, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Type the word "bikini" into the search engine and you'll find far more skin. Sounds to me like you're more opposed to the actual wearing of rubber than the amount of skin exposed. Novatom 18:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
This page might benefit from being further wikified and partitioned into sections. Fsecret 19:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- My strategy would be more like moving large chunks of text out of the article and into the talk page because they are probably OR. Lotusduck 20:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
what the hell
i searched rubberman and got redirected here. i thought rubberman was a superhero, and was expecting that, though instead came to this page. i jut found it surprising lol, expecting a superhero, instead finding a fetish. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Briefranch (talk • contribs) 22:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC).
24 hours
The editor(s) so interested in keeping this original research article have 24 hours to produce a single reliable source. That is all I want. After that it gets merged back into the "Garment Fetishism" article. NeoFreak 20:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
- Please do not threaten to violate WP:Point.--Taxwoman 21:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)