Revision as of 06:37, 8 March 2024 edit2402:e280:3d48:133:bd34:df63:92ea:cd01 (talk) →Indus Valley Civilisation ContradictoryTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:38, 8 March 2024 edit undo2402:e280:3d48:133:bd34:df63:92ea:cd01 (talk) →Indus Valley Civilisation ContradictoryTag: Manual revertNext edit → | ||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
==] Contradictory== | ==] Contradictory== | ||
What contradictory Afghanistan's Indus sites are just trading posts not important to the IVC sites India and Pakistan has if Afghanistan is included in the civilisation extended then why |
What contradictory Afghanistan's Indus sites are just trading posts not important to the IVC sites India and Pakistan has if Afghanistan is included in the civilisation extended then why Daimabad in Maharashtra is not included. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 13:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
:@] Do you have any argument for this, during the Indus Valley Civilizations prime period it was mostly centered around Indus between the Indus and Ganges rivers. ] (]) 14:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC) | :@] Do you have any argument for this, during the Indus Valley Civilizations prime period it was mostly centered around Indus between the Indus and Ganges rivers. ] (]) 14:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:38, 8 March 2024
Have a look
Have a look at these changes. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 13:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Fylindfotberserk: thanks; totally escaped my attention. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 13:24, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, have a look at these changes by a new user. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Fylindfotberserk: I noticed too, but this one seems to be okay. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 17:38, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Meditation Third Opinion
Hi, I'm trying to start a WP:3O on meditation. I think that makes more sense than an RFC since it's just you and me arguing. BTW, I don't understand why you put "arbitrary header #1" etc. on the talk page. Did my formatting offend you? Anyway, I hope I'm phrasing our disagreement neutrally and accurately. I'm going to hold off on listing it to make sure you agree with my characterizations. Cheers. DolyaIskrina (talk) 01:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- @DolyaIskrina: when a talkpage-text becomes long, it's convenient to shorten the part to be loaded when editing by adding those "arbitrary headers." Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 02:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I see. Thanks. I often tweak the indentations on talk pages for clearer demarcation of who said what. I worried I had done something untoward. DolyaIskrina (talk) 19:43, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to join New pages patrol
Hello Joshua Jonathan!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Misplaced Pages’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Brahma Sutras page
Hi @Joshua Jonathan not sure if you saw this - I was going to revert as disruptive edits by the IP, but wanted to see if you are thinking the same. Asteramellus (talk) 17:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Ateramellus: seems like a knowledgeable editor to me. I only wonder why they removed the link to Achintya Bheda Abheda? Regards, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 19:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Joshua Jonathan Thanks. I was a bit unsure about some of the terms that were used, which seemed somewhat inconsistent. Asteramellus (talk) 19:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Regarding reflist-talk
Hi Joshua, the reflist-talk usually includes not only the sources mentioned in a single editor's reply/comment, but also all the other sources mentioned in other editors' replies in that section. That's why the sources that were not mentioned by me, but by StarkReport, are also there. So ideally, it should be at the very bottom of the section. — Kaalakaa 08:33, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Indus Valley Civilisation Contradictory
What contradictory Afghanistan's Indus sites are just trading posts not important to the IVC sites India and Pakistan has if Afghanistan is included in the civilisation extended then why Daimabad in Maharashtra is not included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:E280:3D48:133:B5F2:E934:7277:2C18 (talk) 13:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Joshua Jonathan Do you have any argument for this, during the Indus Valley Civilizations prime period it was mostly centered around Indus between the Indus and Ganges rivers. 2402:E280:3D48:133:5C5E:C4CC:5B88:20A6 (talk) 14:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Hinduism#Adding "INFOBOX RELIGION"
@Joshua Jonathan You have not responded on the talk page section which you were previously active on, and you simply removed the infobox without any discussion. What is the reason? If you have any further points comment, but you are refusing to discuss and bent on taking action Pharaoh496 (talk) 14:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Pharaoh496: responded to what? Your message
All right folks, adding it on the main page now. Hopefully no backlash.
? I've discussed this through and through; if you go through the talkpage-thread again, it should be quite obvious to you that there is a strong opposition to add this infobox. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 16:15, 7 March 2024 (UTC)- no, the messages above it! I have tagged you multiple times over the few days Pharaoh496 (talk) 16:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Take that as a non-consent. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 16:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- no, the messages above it! I have tagged you multiple times over the few days Pharaoh496 (talk) 16:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
"Tantras" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Tantras has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 7 § Tantras until a consensus is reached. JIP | Talk 19:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC)