Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
::found non-primary source and added it thereafter ] (]) 21:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
::found non-primary source and added it thereafter ] (]) 21:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
== Allied to Azov brigade? ==
The infobox says they're allied with Azov, but it seems like a stretch to say that they were and currently '''are''' allied like the article says. The source only says they have "links" to Azov and I wouldn't call going on a podcast together and them sending a delegation to meet Azov Brigade great evidence of an alliance or "close cooperation", especially given the NRM's stance on the war. On their website they seem to take a neutral or slightly pro-Russian stance on the conflict. They describe it as a "brother war" and say that "" but they also say NATO provocation prompted Russia to invade. If anything, surely it'd be more accurate to say they're allied with and support Rusich group (a Russian neo-nazi group) given that they've worked with and sheltered the organization's second in command. ] (]) 08:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Revision as of 08:12, 11 March 2024
This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
The following Misplaced Pages contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
@Gooduserdude: I don't believe that anything on this website should be sourced to any Nazi publication or outlet but I don't see how I could put that into practice on this page. My concern regarding the edit I reverted is more specific: it's the only thing on this article that's sourced to this organization's own website, which per WP:PRIMARY is rarely allowed. The first requirement at that policy section says that if a primary source is used, it must be "reputably published" and I bet I'd have no problem compiling dozens, hundreds, thousands of lies, inflammatory statements, and attacks on that website to prove it's no such thing.
The infobox says they're allied with Azov, but it seems like a stretch to say that they were and currently are allied like the article says. The source only says they have "links" to Azov and I wouldn't call going on a podcast together and them sending a delegation to meet Azov Brigade great evidence of an alliance or "close cooperation", especially given the NRM's stance on the war. On their website they seem to take a neutral or slightly pro-Russian stance on the conflict. They describe it as a "brother war" and say that "none of the conflicting sides are worth our official support" but they also say NATO provocation prompted Russia to invade. If anything, surely it'd be more accurate to say they're allied with and support Rusich group (a Russian neo-nazi group) given that they've worked with and sheltered the organization's second in command. 2403:580D:8038:0:F8EF:DB22:E3E2:E6D8 (talk) 08:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
