| Revision as of 02:47, 16 March 2024 editAcroterion (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators232,515 edits CT noticeTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:48, 16 March 2024 edit undoSideswipe9th (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers11,284 edits →Introduction to contentious topics - biographies of living and recently deceased people: new sectionTags: Reverted contentious topics alert New topicNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| <p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the ] or you may learn more about this contentious topic ]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 02:47, 16 March 2024 (UTC) | <p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the ] or you may learn more about this contentious topic ]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 02:47, 16 March 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Introduction to contentious topics - biographies of living and recently deceased people == | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''articles about ], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles''', a topic designated as ''']'''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. | |||
| A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. | |||
| Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully</strong> and <strong>constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and: | |||
| *adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages; | |||
| *comply with all applicable policies and guidelines; | |||
| *follow editorial and behavioural best practice; | |||
| *comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and | |||
| *refrain from gaming the system. | |||
| <p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the ] or you may learn more about this contentious topic ]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> ] (]) 02:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:48, 16 March 2024
January 2024
Hey, you stated that the Ryanair group is the only MAX8-200 operator. In fact Akasa Air also operates this aircraft type. 80.187.75.252 (talk) 13:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, appreciate the correction - the table wasn't updated at the time (which i see you've since updated so thank you) so i was just basing it off of that. T9537 (talk) 23:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
- Alright. The number of employed people at Ryanair were stated by an anonymous user (93.108.61.93) and not by Cagliost. In the former stated numbers the amount of cabin crew was wrong: 9500 instead of 13,300.
- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:MobileDiff/1197689692
- I'm fine with how it's now. Just another word "about" can be removed. 80.187.75.128 (talk) 11:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi; I didn't bother checking specifics - just noticed that pilots and the rest was right, so assumed it was right. I did update it however to be more accurate. T9537 (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
AN
If you're going to make accusations against someone on AN, you'd better provide plenty of diffs to illustrate your point and articulate it clearly in a well spelled-out argument. Don't expect others to do your homework. Toddst1 (talk) 01:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the help / Advice!
- Would you be able to point / guide me in a direction to get a better understanding of how to do this? T9537 (talk) 01:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well, your discussion really belongs on WP:ANI not AN per the notice at the top of the page. It's kind of assumed that if you're going to take an issue to that level of a forum, you know how to make your point, so other than the "Before you post" stuff at the top of the ANI page, there's Misplaced Pages:ANIISLOUSY which will probably not be much use to you. Good luck. Toddst1 (talk) 01:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. Would you suggest moving it to ANI? T9537 (talk) 01:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- If nobody has commented yet, I recommend removing it completely and redoing it in your sandbox outlining your case much, much better before bringing it to ani. If someone has commented on it, you need to leave it. Toddst1 (talk) 01:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Awesome - no comments yet, so i've moved it to ANI. Thanks for your help :) T9537 (talk) 02:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- If nobody has commented yet, I recommend removing it completely and redoing it in your sandbox outlining your case much, much better before bringing it to ani. If someone has commented on it, you need to leave it. Toddst1 (talk) 01:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. Would you suggest moving it to ANI? T9537 (talk) 01:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well, your discussion really belongs on WP:ANI not AN per the notice at the top of the page. It's kind of assumed that if you're going to take an issue to that level of a forum, you know how to make your point, so other than the "Before you post" stuff at the top of the ANI page, there's Misplaced Pages:ANIISLOUSY which will probably not be much use to you. Good luck. Toddst1 (talk) 01:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Acroterion (talk) 02:47, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics - biographies of living and recently deceased people
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.