Misplaced Pages

Andrew Huberman: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:12, 27 March 2024 view sourceZenomonoz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,019 edits I'm not sure why we are adding two sources into single sentences. It makes more sense to attribute and keep them separate.Tag: Visual edit← Previous edit Revision as of 03:13, 27 March 2024 view source 2601:645:8300:20d0:c048:642a:27c7:8c0f (talk) You're correct, I am adding the reliable source here. Why do you keep reverting? Your reversion removed the citation. Carefully review my edit before reverting.Tags: Reverted Visual editNext edit →
Line 39: Line 39:


=== Reception === === Reception ===
In ], Jamie Ducharme has described Huberman as having a "massive and dedicated audience" with millions of fans. Joseph Zundell, a ] biologist, trusts Huberman's expertise in ] but also criticized him for extrapolating ] for human use without appropriate scientific justification and straying from his area of expertise.<ref name="Time" /> These criticisms were echoed by ''New York Magazine'', who stated that Huberman "extrapolates wildly from limited animal studies, posits certainty where there is ambiguity, and stumbles when he veers too far from his narrow realm of study", though also writing that the podcast "is an expansive, free compendium of human knowledge. There are quack guests, but these are greatly outnumbered by profound, complex, patient, and often moving descriptions of biological process."<ref name=":3" /> Neuroscientist ], who has known Huberman since his postdoctoral research and has been a guest on his podcast, says that Huberman's research is respected among neuroscientists and described his podcast as "a fabulous service for the world" and a way to "open the doors" to the world of science.<ref name="Time" /> In ], Jamie Ducharme has described Huberman as having a "massive and dedicated audience" with millions of fans.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ducharme |first=Jamie |date=2023-06-28 |title=How Andrew Huberman Got America to Care About Science |url=https://time.com/6290594/andrew-hubman-lab-podcast-interview/ |access-date=2024-03-27 |website=TIME |language=en}}</ref> Joseph Zundell, a ] biologist, trusts Huberman's expertise in ] but also criticized him for extrapolating ] for human use without appropriate scientific justification and straying from his area of expertise.<ref name="Time" /> These criticisms were echoed by ''New York Magazine'', who stated that Huberman "extrapolates wildly from limited animal studies, posits certainty where there is ambiguity, and stumbles when he veers too far from his narrow realm of study", though also writing that the podcast "is an expansive, free compendium of human knowledge. There are quack guests, but these are greatly outnumbered by profound, complex, patient, and often moving descriptions of biological process."<ref name=":3" /> Neuroscientist ], who has known Huberman since his postdoctoral research and has been a guest on his podcast, says that Huberman's research is respected among neuroscientists and described his podcast as "a fabulous service for the world" and a way to "open the doors" to the world of science.<ref name="Time" />


] from the ] has questioned Huberman's promotion of "poorly regulated" dietary supplements. According to Jarry, The Huberman Lab podcast has been sponsored by "companies offering questionable products from the perspective of ]".<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Jarry |first=Jonathan |date=7 April 2023 |title=Andrew Huberman Has Supplements on the Brain |url=https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critical-thinking-health-and-nutrition/andrew-huberman-has-bad-case-supplement-brain |access-date=2023-06-15 |website=McGill University Office for Science and Society |language=en}}</ref> ] from the ] has questioned Huberman's promotion of "poorly regulated" dietary supplements. According to Jarry, The Huberman Lab podcast has been sponsored by "companies offering questionable products from the perspective of ]".<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Jarry |first=Jonathan |date=7 April 2023 |title=Andrew Huberman Has Supplements on the Brain |url=https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/critical-thinking-health-and-nutrition/andrew-huberman-has-bad-case-supplement-brain |access-date=2023-06-15 |website=McGill University Office for Science and Society |language=en}}</ref>

Revision as of 03:13, 27 March 2024

American neuroscientist and podcaster
Andrew Huberman
Huberman in 2016
BornAndrew David Huberman
(1975-09-26) September 26, 1975 (age 49)
Palo Alto, California, U.S.
Education
ParentBernardo Huberman
Scientific career
FieldsNeuroscience
InstitutionsStanford University
University of California, San Diego
ThesisNeural activity and axon guidance cue regulation of eye-specific retinogeniculate development (2004)
Academic advisorsBen Barres (Stanford)
Barbara Chapman (UCD)
William DeBello (UCD)
Hwai-Jong Cheng (UCD)
Marc Breedlove (UCB)
Harry J. Carlisle (UCSB)
Websitehubermanlab.com

Andrew David Huberman (born September 26, 1975) is an American neuroscientist and podcaster. He is an associate professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at Stanford University School of Medicine. He hosts the Huberman Lab podcast, which he started in 2021 and he is partner, scientific advisor and promoter of dietary supplement companies since 2022.

Early life and education

Huberman was born in Palo Alto, California, to Bernardo Huberman, an Argentine physicist and Stanford University professor and his mother, a children's book author, who divorced when Huberman was a child. He attended Gunn High School.

Huberman received a B.A. in psychology from the University of California, Santa Barbara, in 1998, an M.A. in psychology from the University of California, Berkeley, in 2000, and a Ph.D. in neuroscience from the University of California, Davis, in 2004. He completed his postdoctoral training in neuroscience at Stanford University under Ben Barres between 2006 and 2011. While at Berkeley, Huberman originally approached Carla J. Shatz to serve as his doctoral advisor; however, she declined the offer, concerned that he had a limited background in molecular and cellular biology and that she would be moving her lab to Harvard. She encouraged Huberman to transfer to UC Davis and reach out to Barbara Chapman.

Academic career

From 2011 to 2015, Huberman was an assistant professor of neurobiology and neuroscience at the University of California, San Diego. In 2016, Huberman took a faculty position at Stanford University.

With David Spiegel, Huberman has carried out research on cortisol and anxiety-based depression. Huberman has led work investigating the regeneration of eye tissue in mice, which may have a future application in studying optical nerve regeneration in humans. New York Magazine stated that as of 2024, Huberman's lab at Stanford "barely exists", with only a single postdoc working there, with the lab having been scaled back significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. A spokesperson for Huberman said that the lab was still operational.

Podcasting and supplements

In 2021, with the encouragement of Lex Fridman, Huberman launched the Huberman Lab podcast. In episodes lasting several hours, Huberman talks about the state of research on a specific topic, both within and outside his specialty. As of 2023, the podcast had become the third most popular podcast in the US on Spotify platforms and the most followed show on Apple Podcasts. His YouTube channel has 5.1 million subscribers and his Instagram account has 5.5 million.

Huberman is a proponent of biohacking, which means sticking to a strict daily routine that incorporates exercise and taking dietary supplements to improve one's productivity.

Reception

In Time magazine, Jamie Ducharme has described Huberman as having a "massive and dedicated audience" with millions of fans. Joseph Zundell, a cancer biologist, trusts Huberman's expertise in neuroscience but also criticized him for extrapolating animal research for human use without appropriate scientific justification and straying from his area of expertise. These criticisms were echoed by New York Magazine, who stated that Huberman "extrapolates wildly from limited animal studies, posits certainty where there is ambiguity, and stumbles when he veers too far from his narrow realm of study", though also writing that the podcast "is an expansive, free compendium of human knowledge. There are quack guests, but these are greatly outnumbered by profound, complex, patient, and often moving descriptions of biological process." Neuroscientist David Berson, who has known Huberman since his postdoctoral research and has been a guest on his podcast, says that Huberman's research is respected among neuroscientists and described his podcast as "a fabulous service for the world" and a way to "open the doors" to the world of science.

Jonathan Jarry from the Office for Science and Society has questioned Huberman's promotion of "poorly regulated" dietary supplements. According to Jarry, The Huberman Lab podcast has been sponsored by "companies offering questionable products from the perspective of science-based medicine".

According to an article in Coda, Huberman has promoted anti-sunscreen views on his podcast, saying he's "as scared of sunscreen as I am of melanoma" and claiming that molecules in some types of sunscreen can be found in neurons 10 years after application without providing any evidence. In a 2023 GQ article, Huberman said that he is not a "sunscreen truther" – a term used to describe anti-sunscreen conspiracy theorists.

Selected publications

References

  1. "@hubermanlab" (Andrew D. Huberman, Ph.D.) on Twitter
  2. Change Your Brain: Neuroscientist Dr. Andrew Huberman | Rich Roll Podcast (Video). July 20, 2020. Event occurs at 2:50. Retrieved December 19, 2022 – via YouTube.
  3. ^ Béchard, Deni Ellis (July 2023). "The Huberman Effect". Stanford Magazine. Retrieved 2023-07-17.
  4. "How a Stanford professor became one of the world's top podcasters". SFgate.com. June 27, 2023. Retrieved June 27, 2023.
  5. ^ Howley, Kerry (2024-03-25). "Andrew Huberman's Mechanisms of Control". Intelligencer. Retrieved 2024-03-26.
  6. ^ Wiseman, Shari (2023). "In conversation with Andrew Huberman". Nature Neuroscience. 26 (8): 1312–1315. doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01395-4. ISSN 1546-1726. PMID 37429915. S2CID 259657196.
  7. Barres, Ben (2018). "Ben A. Barres" (PDF). In Albright, Tom; R. Squire, Larry (eds.). The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography. Vol. 10. Society for Neuroscience. p. 62. ISBN 978-0-916110-10-9.
  8. "Andrew D. Huberman | Stanford Medicine". CAP Profiles (in Samoan). Retrieved 2024-01-10.
  9. "HawkeTalk: The Power of Focus and Passion with Andrew Huberman". CSQ. October 2021.
  10. Weintraub, Karen (11 July 2016). "Regrown Brain Cells Give Blind Mice a New View". Scientific American.
  11. Barres 2018, p. 45.
  12. Shapiro, Ariel (2023-11-29). "Apple and Spotify have revealed their top podcasts of 2023. Here is what they do — and don't — tell us". The Verge. Retrieved 2023-12-12.
  13. "Apple shares the most popular podcasts of 2023". Apple Newsroom. Retrieved 2023-12-12.
  14. ^ Ducharme, Jamie (2023-06-28). "How Andrew Huberman Got America to Care About Science". Time. Retrieved 2023-07-11.
  15. Spotify. "Podcast Charts". Podcast Charts. Retrieved 2022-12-19.
  16. "Apple Podcasts : United States of America : All Podcasts Podcast Charts - Top". chartable.com. Retrieved 2022-12-19.
  17. Silva, Christianna (2023-10-13). "Huberman husbands and the rise of self-optimization". Mashable. Retrieved 2024-02-08.
  18. Ducharme, Jamie (2023-06-28). "How Andrew Huberman Got America to Care About Science". TIME. Retrieved 2024-03-27.
  19. Jarry, Jonathan (7 April 2023). "Andrew Huberman Has Supplements on the Brain". McGill University Office for Science and Society. Retrieved 2023-06-15.
  20. Beres, Derek (October 3, 2023). "The dangerous myths sold by the conspiritualists". Coda.
  21. Reiss, Sami (2023). "What's Behind the Rise of the Sunscreen Truther?". GQ. Retrieved 2023-10-06.

External links

Categories: