Revision as of 16:06, 3 April 2024 view sourceSdkb (talk | contribs)Administrators81,286 edits →Wikimania scholarships: bump← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:08, 4 April 2024 view source Jimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,538 edits →Hi!: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
I got a question for you, did you find the Jimbo Whales joke funny?, if not, im sorry. ] Your bisexual friend! 14:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC) | I got a question for you, did you find the Jimbo Whales joke funny?, if not, im sorry. ] Your bisexual friend! 14:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
:What joke do you mean? I'm sure I can enjoy almost anything really. I'm a pretty chill person. ] (]) 15:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:08, 4 April 2024
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
Jimbo welcomes your comments and updates – he has an open door policy. He holds the founder's seat on the Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees. The current trustees occupying "community-selected" seats are Rosiestep, Laurentius, Victoria and Pundit. The Wikimedia Foundation's Lead Manager of Trust and Safety is Jan Eissfeldt. |
This page is semi-protected and you will not be able to leave a message here unless you are a registered editor. Instead, you can leave a message here |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
This talkpage has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Centralized discussion
- Blocks for promotional activity outside of mainspace
- Voluntary RfAs after resignation
- Two-factor authentication for page movers
- Proposed rewrite of WP:BITE
- LLM/chatbot comments in discussions
Wikimania scholarships
Hi Jimmy — I received an email this morning from the Wikimania 2024 Scholarship Committee, led by K2suvi (talk · global contribs), rejecting my application.
You may have come across my recent RfA, which I link only to establish that my level of participation in Wikimedia projects is not considered borderline by the community here.
From past discussion with other editors, I understand that this outcome is not unusual — the scholarship committee, constrained by a budget that last year permitted them to accept only 16% of applicants, and following a rubric better-suited to affiliate/outreach work than on-wiki editing, routinely rejects even functionaries and other highly respected editors.
In-person conferences provide a valuable opportunity to bring together the different parts of the movement and bridge some of the cultural divides that exist between them. Personally, the connections I have made at WikiConference North America have been invaluable, particularly for my work collaborating with foundation staff to inform the development of features like the Growth team's project on newcomer article creation, which is using my vision for a better Article Wizard as a model. I would have liked to expand and deepen those connections at Wikimania.
I recognize that travel scholarships aren't cheap. However, I find it deeply unfortunate — not just for myself, but for everyone similarly situated and for the resulting opportunity cost to the movement — that the foundation, belying its oft-repeated appreciation for the editor community, has chosen to devote so few of its considerable financial resources to enabling editors to join its flagship conference in person.
Given your own role at Wikimania and influence as a trustee over the foundation's budget, I am interested to hear your thoughts on this topic. Also pinging @Nadzik and @SGrabarczuk (WMF) as the respective Lead and Communications Lead for the conference.
Regards, Sdkb 22:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Sdkb, thank you for your ping.
- You are raising an important matter that the Core Organizing Team (and all past COTs) is well aware of and is actively trying to combat. Wikimedia conferences are an important space of celebration and knowledge exchange in our Movement and we wish all of the community members could attend them. As much as we would want to, unfortunately, we don’t have resources to offer a scholarship to all of the deserving volunteers. This year the acceptance rate is 15 times less than the number of Wikimedians who applied for the scholarship, in spite of having increased from 2023 the total number of scholarships granted. For 2024 we have shifted our resources to awarding more partial scholarships to the people in the region (CEE, NWE and MENA), but even then, we still had to reject many well-prepared and worthy applicants.
- We are working with the WMF to stretch the resources we were given, so the maximum number of scholars can benefit from the conference. I can already share with you that for 2024 we are looking to send a record number of at least 230 scholars to Wikimania, but even this number (almost double from 2019 and 20% more than in 2023) doesn’t allow us to send everyone we would have loved to see at the conference. The Wikimedia Foundation will continue to subsidize the in person ticket and cover all costs related to the virtual event – it will remain free to attend virtually.
- In the next few weeks and months, we will be publishing data about the scholarship process. We would like to publish several “lessons learned”, both for the community and future organizers and useful resources for future applicants (including a few best-scored applications from this year and general comments that should be useful in application preparing for future Wikimanias and other conferences).
- If you have any more questions about this year’s process, please watch the page on Wikimania wiki where we will publish more information. Please feel free to reach out to me as well if you’d like.
- Cheers, Nadzik (talk) 21:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the detailed response. Sounds like the # of scholarships last year was around 200 and this year is around 230, and that a very large # of editors apply. Do you happen to know the total number of applicants last year and this year? Just to get an idea. –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Novem Linguae!
- Last year 1,206 applications were moved to the grading phase. For Wikimania 2024 there were 1,433 applications that the scholarship working group worked on. In addition to that, there were many more (majority) that were discarded in earlier phases or on technical basis (e.g. banned users, unfinished applications, partially blank, single words answers etc), so they were not graded by our team. If you are interested, more detailed information and stats will be published on Wikimania wiki in the next few weeks and months. Nadzik (talk) 13:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Great info. Thank you. So this year it was about 230/1433 = 16%, or approximately 1 in 7. Yeah, pretty competitive. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- I've left a note at Nadzik's talk page wondering the exact amount allocated for these 230 scholarships for Poland and other questions pertaining to funding conferences. Thanks for this ongoing discussion (had also left a note at Skdb's talk page a few days ago). Is there still time to increase the number of scholarships to the Poland conference? Randy Kryn (talk) 13:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
- Great info. Thank you. So this year it was about 230/1433 = 16%, or approximately 1 in 7. Yeah, pretty competitive. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the detailed response. Sounds like the # of scholarships last year was around 200 and this year is around 230, and that a very large # of editors apply. Do you happen to know the total number of applicants last year and this year? Just to get an idea. –Novem Linguae (talk) 21:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- While it would be great if the WMF had infinite resources, I personally think it would be best if the WMF spent less on conferences—and more on things like the community wishlist that benefit readers and editors who don't go to meetups. (t · c) buidhe 19:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that the foundation ought to be spending more on community priorities. Conferences are an opportunity for us to advocate for those priorities and build relationships with foundation staff that bring our priorities into better alignment — but that can only happen if we are present. Sdkb 19:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Bumping thread. Jimbo Wales, I am interested to hear your thoughts on this topic. Sdkb 16:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | |
thanks for making wikipedia CianPolonorte (talk) 21:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 29 March 2024
- Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
- Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
- Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
- Humour: Letters from the editors
- Comix: Layout issue
Happy April!
April fools! File:Thebelltolls.png Sebbers10 Your bisexual friend! 15:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Your user page
Sorry to see that your user page was destroyed by the WP:CABAL. TheTechie (formerly Mseingth2133444) (t/c) 16:33, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Edelman Family Foundation
Hello Jimmy Wales!
I am writing to you regarding a concerning issue with the Edelman Family Foundation section in the Joseph Edelman Misplaced Pages article, which I believe requires your attention and guidance.
Firstly, I want to express my gratitude for your valuable suggestion to expand the section to encompass the full scope of the Edelman Family Foundation's activities, rather than focusing solely on a single donation.
However, I have encountered fierce opposition from some editors when attempting to include information about the foundation's numerous other contributions to various causes, as evidenced by reliable sources such as ProPublica.
Despite my efforts to provide a more neutral and complete picture of the organization's activities, the section continues to focus SOLELY on the controversial donation to the DO NOT HARM organization, while ignoring the foundation's support for educational initiatives, scientific research, and other charitable causes.
This selective inclusion of information raises serious concerns about bias and the violation of Misplaced Pages's core principle of neutrality (WP:NPOV). The current state of the section paints an unbalanced and misleading picture of the Edelman Family Foundation, which goes against our mission to provide accurate and unbiased information to our readers.
I suspect that there may be underlying biases influencing the resistance to include a more comprehensive and neutral representation of the foundation's activities. To address this issue, I have initiated a discussion on the BLP Noticeboard, where I hope to engage with other editors and work towards finding a consensual solution.
Given your role as the founder of Misplaced Pages and your commitment to maintaining the integrity of the platform, I kindly request your participation in this discussion or at least sharing your opinion. Llama Tierna (talk) 18:02, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- WP:YOULOSE: ...a selected few contributors feel that as Jimbo Wales is the founder/co-founder of Misplaced Pages that it would be best to appeal to him directly. The theory behind this is that their appeals will be heard and Jimbo will latch onto the argument in full agreement with the petitioner. Thereafter, Jimbo will logically smite the wicked editor who dared raise concerns about their behaviour/fundamentally change existing policy/delete the offending item from Misplaced Pages. The unfortunate news here is that it almost never works. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 23:02, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Let me disagree with you, @AirshipJungleman29, and it looks like you only wish to discourage me from doing the right things. Thanks for "helping" new Misplaced Pages editors indeed based on your in-depth knowledge and experience! For your information, Jimmy Wales has the same rights to share his opinion on any Misplaced Pages article, and I treat him as an equal editor, not as a "problem solver" as you described in your very personal message. You'd also be surprised that Jimmy Wales actually responded to my previous message left here and suggested improving the section on the Edelman Family
- Foundation. Here is the reference, so you can read it. Don't hesitate to share another helpful opinion.
- Yours faithfully, Llama Tierna (talk) 13:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
A Special Barnstar for you
The Special Barnstar | ||
A huge thank you also from me for creating Misplaced Pages. |
JacktheBrown (talk) 09:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi!
I got a question for you, did you find the Jimbo Whales joke funny?, if not, im sorry. Sebbers10 Your bisexual friend! 14:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- What joke do you mean? I'm sure I can enjoy almost anything really. I'm a pretty chill person. Jimbo Wales (talk) 15:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)