| Revision as of 20:45, 2 April 2024 editEtruscanMayhem (talk | contribs)183 edits Question about creating new list← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:42, 4 April 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,704 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Women's History/Archive 14) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/A-F&oldid=1189989138 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:Lajmmoore@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/A-F&oldid=1189989138 --> | ||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 12:26, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 09:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | == Requested move at ] == | ||
Revision as of 18:42, 4 April 2024
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Women's History and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | Women Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | Women's History Project‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | This WikiProject was featured on the WikiProject report at the Signpost on 12 March 2012. |
WikiProject Women's History
Quick Menu (edit · changes)- Main · Discuss the Project
- Recognized content
- Members
- Resources
- Assessment
- Article Alerts
- Popular pages
- Templates
- Did You Know
- Featured Pictures
- In this month
- Quotes
- Ask a question
- Requested articles
- Taskforces
 | On 6 March 2024, it was proposed that this page be moved to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Women's history. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
January 2020 at Women in Red
|
Cora Sue Collins
Hi. Can someone give some care and love to Cora Sue Collins please?
Sexual slavery in Islam
I would be grateful if some people with subject knowledge could assess the sweeping edits currently being done to that article. I'm getting the impression that this is the wholesale replacement of one interpretation with another, based on very selective sources, but I simply don't know the subject area. In any case I suspect these big deletes/replacements need some talk page discussion before being implemented. - Also notified WikiProject Islam. --Elmidae (talk · contribs)
GAR of Eva Perón
Eva Perón
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisting per general consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
GA from 2006, it was't reassessed. Half of the article is unsourced, with 'This article needs additional citations for verification.' on top, 5 'citation needed' tags and two 'This section does not cite any sources' templates (Female Peronist Party and women's suffrage and Honours), see also unsourced sections: Juan Perón's arrest, 1946 presidential election, European tour, Vice-presidential nomination, Re-election and Spiritual Leader of the Nation; and 19 'page needed' tags. Artem.G (talk) 19:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delist - Article needs a lot of work to be kept as a GA. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:50, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delist per above. Needs significant work. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
 
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Requested move at Talk:Maria Antonia Ferdinanda of Spain#Requested move 11 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Maria Antonia Ferdinanda of Spain#Requested move 11 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Hildegard of the Vinzgau#Requested move 11 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Hildegard of the Vinzgau#Requested move 11 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Vilma Santos-Recto#Requested move 14 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Vilma Santos-Recto#Requested move 14 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
FAR for Emmy Noether
I have nominated Emmy Noether for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 20:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Isabella II of Spain#Requested move 26 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Isabella II of Spain#Requested move 26 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 20:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2024
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Good article reassessment for Marian Breland Bailey
Marian Breland Bailey has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 10:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Luluwah bint Abdulaziz#Requested move 30 January 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Luluwah bint Abdulaziz#Requested move 30 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 22:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Anne, Queen of Great Britain#Requested move 15 February 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Anne, Queen of Great Britain#Requested move 15 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 13:16, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Nina Simone
Nina Simone has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Schierbecker (talk) 18:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Clare Winger Harris
Clare Winger Harris has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 12:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2024
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Requested move 6 March 2024
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Women's History → Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Women's history – Lowercase "history" to match WP:WikiProject Women's sport (whose template has 132k transclusions), as well as WP:WikiProject Women artists (20k), WP:WikiProject Women scientists (24k), & WP:WikiProject Women writers (68k). ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 23:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 02:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. queen of 🖤 (they/them; chat) 19:45, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. If there is a case to change this, then similar changes would probably be needed for WP Women in Red and WP Women's Health as well as more generally for U.S. Roads, Television Stations, Ice Hockey, etc., etc. Not sure whether it would all be worthwhile.--Ipigott (talk) 10:22, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- WP:WikiProject Women's Health → "health" for sure, if "history" passes, at least to make all the women WPs internally consistent, which they are very close to being. "History" & "Health" are outliers amongst the lowercase variants, and if the reverse were true, then RMs to make them all uppercase would be just as valid. Going full slippery-slope beyond women seems like an overreaction. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 15:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- As both WP Women in Red and WP Wiki Loves Women have been widely quoted in the international press as well as on Meta and in many other language versions of Misplaced Pages, I think it would be a major mistake to change them to WP:Women in red and WP Wiki loves women.--Ipigott (talk) 15:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'm with Ipigott on this: "Women in Red" is more like a proper noun, a distinctive name, while "Women's history" is a plain description of a topic. PamD 16:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'm with Ipigott too; I don't think WP:Women in Red & WP:Wiki Loves Women should be changed. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 17:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'm with Ipigott on this: "Women in Red" is more like a proper noun, a distinctive name, while "Women's history" is a plain description of a topic. PamD 16:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- As both WP Women in Red and WP Wiki Loves Women have been widely quoted in the international press as well as on Meta and in many other language versions of Misplaced Pages, I think it would be a major mistake to change them to WP:Women in red and WP Wiki loves women.--Ipigott (talk) 15:23, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- WP:WikiProject Women's Health → "health" for sure, if "history" passes, at least to make all the women WPs internally consistent, which they are very close to being. "History" & "Health" are outliers amongst the lowercase variants, and if the reverse were true, then RMs to make them all uppercase would be just as valid. Going full slippery-slope beyond women seems like an overreaction. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 15:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Let the WikiProject members decide Randy Kryn (talk) 15:54, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I had to stare at the proposal for awhile to even pick up the capitalization change in the last word. Certainly nothing wrong with standardization so long as all the links continue work. - RevelationDirect (talk) 22:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as frivolous. This isn't even an arcane WP:MOS issue, it's even less than that. The only way this will affect anyone is by annoying them. -- asilvering (talk) 16:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. This is consistent with how most projects are named. To Ipigott,
Television Stations
has been renamed 4 years ago to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Television/Television stations task force. Gonnym (talk) 07:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Renaming WikiProjects properly is a lot of work and not worth doing over a triviality like this. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:53, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Amytis of Babylon#Requested move 12 February 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Amytis of Babylon#Requested move 12 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. asilvering (talk) 05:15, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Isabella I of Castile#Requested move 29 February 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Isabella I of Castile#Requested move 29 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Векочел (talk) 13:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for All-China Women's Federation
All-China Women's Federation has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:19, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback wanted
Re: merge of Weinstein effect and MeToo movement
---Another Believer (Talk) 23:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2024
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Feedback Needed on Women's History List
I'd like to create a List for a WikiEdu archaeology course project. The list would be about women from Mediterranean/adjacent cultures known thanks to the archaeological record but who are otherwise lost to history because they were not described in ancient literary sources. There are already Wiki lists for 'distinguished Roman women' , ancient prostitutes, etc., but no lists for these 'real' women. These women typically do not have Misplaced Pages articles/stubs. I had an editor look at the sandbox draft (which is still incomplete because my students have to add their entries) and was told "This does not seem to meet the criteria for WP:NLIST."
The (incomplete) draft is here with its first list entry as an example: User:EtruscanMayhem/sandbox. The other listed women (with empty entries) are the assigned student topics. The opening description saying: "The following list features women from the ancient Mediterranean and adjacent areas (e.g., Near East) who are attested archaeologically. Rather than focus on women mentioned in preserved literary texts passed down in the manuscript tradition, the list highlights women whose experiences have only survived thanks to the archaeological record. Their associated archaeological evidence reveals valuable data not just about the individual woman herself, but about women's history in that ancient region more generally. Such archaeological source material includes excavated inscriptions, tablets, papyri, artifacts, burials, monuments, archaeological contexts, and other such data."
It seems to me that these entries do indeed add to the work of the Women's History Project. Can you give some feedback on either a) how to make the list fit with criteria for WP:NLIST, or b) suggest whether these women should simply be given stub articles? Thanks. --EtruscanMayhem (talk) 20:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Categories: