| Revision as of 00:30, 25 April 2024 edit174.228.165.131 (talk) →Worst Golden Raspberry Awards by the year: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit |
Revision as of 12:57, 25 April 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,163 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Golden Raspberry Awards/Archive 1) (botNext edit → |
| Line 12: |
Line 12: |
|
|archive = Talk:Golden Raspberry Awards/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Golden Raspberry Awards/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== Orphaned references in ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
I check pages listed in ] to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for ] in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of ]'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for ''this'' article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article. |
|
|
|
|
|
<b>Reference named "razzie":</b><ul> |
|
|
<li>From ]: {{cite web |title=Razzie Awards |url=https://www.imdb.com/event/ev0000558/1995 |access-date=11 July 2017 |website=IMDb}}</li> |
|
|
<li>From ]: {{cite web|url= http://www.razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=29|title= Razzie Awards 1989|url-status=dead|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160104201355/http://www.razzies.com/asp/content/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=29|archive-date= January 4, 2016|df= mdy-all|publisher=Razzies Awards}}</li> |
|
|
<li>From ]: {{cite web|url=https://www.razzies.com/razz-newz.html|title=The Razzies!|access-date=March 12, 2021|publisher=Golden Raspberry Award Foundation|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210205122022/https://www.razzies.com/razz-newz.html|archive-date=February 5, 2021}}</li> |
|
|
<li>From ]: {{cite book|title=The Official Razzie Movie Guide|last=Wilson|first=John|publisher=]|year=2007|isbn=9780446510080|chapter=Fourteenth Annual Razzies (1993)|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bLpJHjGFNk8C&pg=PT256}}</li> |
|
|
<li>From ]: {{cite web |url=http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=334&PN=2 |title=1984 Razzie Awards Winners and Nominees |publisher=Razzies.com |access-date=2009-09-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100104024448/http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=334&PN=2# |archive-date=January 4, 2010 |url-status=dead |df=mdy-all }}</li> |
|
|
</ul> |
|
|
|
|
|
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. <small>Feel free to remove this comment after fixing the refs.</small> ]] 22:24, 6 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Original research and synthesis == |
|
|
|
|
|
I just cut the article in half kilobyte-wise by removing violations of ] and ]. Please stop inserting unreferenced comparisons. And please stop inserting comparisons that are cited to and . The act of putting two separate cites together to infer something else is a violation of ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
What you need are citations that actually say this film or this person got a Razzie and they also got an Oscar (or whatever). These should not be listed blankly like at IMDb. Instead, a human author should be cited writing prose about how the two awards are remarkable being won by the same person or film. Good examples of that are: |
|
|
*This archived LA Times blog page |
|
|
*This CBS News page |
|
|
*This Yahoo News page |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks in advance. ] (]) 05:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Worst Golden Raspberry Awards by the year == |
|
== Worst Golden Raspberry Awards by the year == |
