Revision as of 09:56, 25 April 2024 editLargoplazo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers119,844 edits →Germanics← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:51, 26 April 2024 edit undoSarcelles (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers9,112 edits →Germanics: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
::One problem here is that "Germanics" is simply not a term found in the English-language literature, so arguing that there's something wrong with it is entirely beside the point. --] (]) 08:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | ::One problem here is that "Germanics" is simply not a term found in the English-language literature, so arguing that there's something wrong with it is entirely beside the point. --] (]) 08:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
:The word "Germanics" doesn't appear in the article, so why are you discussing this here? ] (]) 09:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | :The word "Germanics" doesn't appear in the article, so why are you discussing this here? ] (]) 09:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | ||
::12 pages link to ], a redirect to ]. | |||
::Maybe we should discuss this on another talk page. ] (]) 04:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:51, 26 April 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the German language article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
This level-3 vital article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
German language was a good article, but it was removed from the list as it no longer met the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. Review: October 13, 2006. |
Remember that article talk pages are provided to coordinate the article's improvement only, and are not for engaging in discussion of off-topic matters not related to the main article. User talk pages are more appropriate for non-article-related discussion topics. Please do not use this page as a discussion forum for off-topic matters. See talk page guidelines. |
"Wie gehts" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Wie gehts has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 22 § Wie gehts until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
"Deutschgesprachen" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Deutschgesprachen has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 22 § Deutschgesprachen until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
poor article contradicts itself in multiple ways
- intro: "or more precisely High German" and table with "Language family ... High German" vs. ISO 639-3 in the talble: "nds – Low German"
- Low German is not High German
- nativename in the table: "Deutsch" vs. bar – Bavarian etc. in the table
- in the various dialects like Bavarian the term for German is different, e.g. in ksh – Kölsch it's Dütsch (cp. WT)
- WP speaks of "High German languages" (plural), yet this is only "German language" (singular). German is broader than High German, so it should be German languages, or German here is short for Standard German which already has a more proper article.
date=June 2023
I am moving this here sic erat from a cleanup hatnote posted by this anonymous user. Dylanvt (talk) 20:56, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Cluster
From the article:
- The Low Franconian dialects Nevertheless, topologically these dialects are structurally and phonologically far more similar to Dutch, than to German and form both the smallest and most divergent dialect cluster within the contemporary German language area.
- Niebaum, Hermann (2011). "Wege und Schwerpunkte der deutschen Dialektologie" . Einführung in die Dialektologie des Deutschen (in German) (2nd ed.). Tübingen: Niemeyer. ISBN 978-3-11-091654-6.
As for the source:
- That's not properly cited, as it lacks the other author Jürgen Macha and as the year or edition is wrong (1st 1999, 2nd 2006, 3rd 2014 - 2011 could only be a reprint or a re-release as e-book or something)
- Quoting from the 3rd ed. as here the text is (basically) the same and as this can still be viewed online:
Hermann Niebaum, Jürgen Macha, Einführung in die Dialektologie des Deutschen, 3rd ed., 2014, p. 104 ()): "Auf der Karte sind ebenfalls drei Hauptgebiete, erkennbar, die sich, wie Nerbonne/Siedle (2005:) festellen, „im Wesentlichen mit den Verteilungen des Nieder-, Ostmittel- und Oberdeutschen (Cluster 1, 4 und 5) nach traditioneller Einteilung decken, sowie ein heterogenes Gebiet im Westen, das in etwa Ripuarisch (Cluster 3) und Niederrheinisch-Westmünderländisch (Cluster 2) entspricht.“
Thus:
- The source doesn't state that Low Franconian is the smallest and most divergent cluster. It's stating that Ripuarisch + Niederrheinisch-Westmünsterländisch form a heterogeneous area. So both the dialect(s) and the degree of comparison (superlative vs. positive) aren't sourced.
- Article stated: "within the contemporary German language area". There's a difference between "in Germany" and "in the German language area". The German language area also comprehends Austria and Switzerland. As the source only considered Germany, the wording in the article wasn't correct.
-06:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Germanics
The German article on the Germanics https://de.wikipedia.org/Germanen says, that the concept can be defined historically outside the linguistic sphere. Sarcelles (talk) 19:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- The very concept of Germanics is disputed by science in Germany, this German article says sourcedly. Furthermore, Germanics hardly is used as a concept for the present by Germans nowadays. Sarcelles (talk) 08:16, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- One problem here is that "Germanics" is simply not a term found in the English-language literature, so arguing that there's something wrong with it is entirely beside the point. --Pfold (talk) 08:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- The word "Germanics" doesn't appear in the article, so why are you discussing this here? Largoplazo (talk) 09:56, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- 12 pages link to Germanics, a redirect to German peoples.
- Maybe we should discuss this on another talk page. Sarcelles (talk) 04:51, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class level-3 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-3 vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class vital articles in Society and social sciences
- C-Class language articles
- Top-importance language articles
- WikiProject Languages articles
- C-Class Germany articles
- Top-importance Germany articles
- WikiProject Germany articles
- C-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- C-Class Switzerland articles
- Top-importance Switzerland articles
- All WikiProject Switzerland pages
- Delisted good articles