| Revision as of 08:03, 12 April 2007 editCharles Matthews (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators360,308 edits rewrite lead← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:04, 12 April 2007 edit undoCharles Matthews (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators360,308 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| '''Sir Walter Thurold''' (also spelt Tirel, Tyrell) (] - some time after ]), was an ] nobleman. He is infamous for his involvement in the death of King ], also known as William Rufus. | '''Sir Walter Thurold''' (also spelt Tirel, Tyrell) (] - some time after ]), was an ] nobleman. He is infamous for his involvement in the death of King ], also known as William Rufus. | ||
| Walter Thurold was born in ], ]. He was married to Adelize, the daughter of ]. He was lord of ] in France, and of ] (as appears in the ]). He died some time after 1100. | Walter Thurold was born in ], ]. He was married to Adelize, the daughter of ]. He was lord of ] in France, and of ] (as appears in the ]). He died some time after 1100. | ||
| ==The Murder of King William II of England== | ==The Murder of King William II of England== | ||
Revision as of 08:04, 12 April 2007
Sir Walter Thurold (also spelt Tirel, Tyrell) (1065 - some time after 1100), was an Anglo-Norman nobleman. He is infamous for his involvement in the death of King William II of England, also known as William Rufus.
Walter Thurold was born in Tonbridge, Kent. He was married to Adelize, the daughter of Richard Fitz Gilbert. He was lord of Poix in France, and of Langham, Essex (as appears in the Domesday Survey). He died some time after 1100.
The Murder of King William II of England
On August 2 1100, William Rufus organized a hunting trip in New Forest. William was presented with six arrows, on the eve of the hunt; taking four for himself, he handed the other two to Thurold, saying, "It is only right that the sharpest be given to the man who knows how to shoot the deadliest shots."
On the subsequent hunt, the party spread out as they chased their prey, and William, in the company of Thurold, became separated from the others. It was the last time that William was seen alive.
In their search for prey, according to chroniclers, Thurold let loose a wild shot at a passing stag. However, instead of striking the stag as intended, the arrow pierced William in the chest, puncturing his lungs. Stricken with panic, Walter leapt upon his horse and fled to France. A version of this tale is given by William of Malmesbury in his Chronicle of the Kings of the English (c. 1128):
- The day before the king died he dreamt that he went to heaven. He suddenly awoke. He commanded a light to be brought, and forbade his attendants to leave him. The next day he went into the forest... He was attended by a few persons... Walter Thurold remained with him, while the others, were on the chase. The sun was now declining, when the king, drawing his bow and letting fly an arrow, slightly wounded a stag which passed before him... The stag was still running... The king, followed it a long time with his eyes, holding up his hand to keep off the power of the sun's rays. At this instant Walter decided to kill another stag. Oh, gracious God! the arrow pierced the king's breast.
- On receiving the wound the king uttered not a word; but breaking off the shaft of the arrow where it projected from his body... This accelerated his death. Walter immediately ran up, but as he found him senseless, he leapt upon his horse, and escaped with the utmost speed. Indeed there were none to pursue him: some helped his flight; others felt sorry for him.
- The king's body was placed on a cart and conveyed to the cathedral at Winchester... blood dripped from the body all the way. Here he was buried within the tower. The next year, the tower fell down. William Rufus died in 1100... aged forty years. He was a man much pitied by the clergy... he had a soul which they could not save... He was loved by his soldiers but hated by the people because he caused them to be plundered.
To some chroniclers, such an 'Act of God' was a just end for a wicked king. However, over the centuries, the obvious suggestion that one of William's many enemies may have had a hand in this extraordinary event has been repeatedly made. Even chroniclers of the time point out that Walter was renowned as a keen bowman, and unlikely to fire such an impetuous shot. And William's brother Henry, who was among the hunting party that day, benefited directly from William's death, as he was shortly after crowned king.
Abbot Suger, another chronicler, was Thurold's friend and sheltered him in his French exile. He said later:
- It was laid to the charge of a certain noble, Walter Thurold, that he had shot the king with an arrow; but I have often heard him, when he had nothing to fear nor to hope, solemnly swear that on the day in question he was not in the part of the forest where the king was hunting, nor ever saw him in the forest at all.
References
- Hollister, C. Warren. "The Strange Death of William Rufus." Speculum, 48.4 (1973): 637-653.
- Warren, W. L. "The Death of William Rufus." History Today, 9 (1959)