| Revision as of 19:59, 9 May 2024 editØksfjord (talk | contribs)59 edits →Slovenia in "Central, Eastern & Southeast Europe"← Previous edit |
Revision as of 23:05, 9 May 2024 edit undoNebY (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,852 edits restoring talk page, unaccountably reverted to its 20 October 2020 state, then re-adding today's one-line addition.Next edit → |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talk header|archive_age=31|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
|
{{British English}} |
|
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Geography|class=B}} |
|
|
{{ITN talk|10 May|2010}} |
|
{{ITN talk|10 May|2010}} |
|
⚫ |
{{On this day|date1=2005-06-25|oldid1=15835821|date2=2006-06-25|oldid2=60556749}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Slovenia|class=b |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1 = |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Slovenia|importance=top}} |
|
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = yes |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Europe|importance=Mid}} |
|
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = yes |
|
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Countries}} |
|
| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes |
|
|
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = yes |
|
|
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes |
|
| ⚫ |
|importance=top}} |
|
| ⚫ |
{{WikiProject Countries|class=b |
|
|
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = yes |
|
|
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = yes |
|
|
| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes |
|
|
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = yes |
|
|
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes |
|
|
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = yes}} |
|
|
{{WP1.0|v0.5=pass|WPCD=yes|class=b |
|
|
| b1 <!--Referencing & citations--> = yes |
|
|
| b2 <!--Coverage & accuracy --> = yes |
|
|
| b3 <!--Structure --> = yes |
|
|
| b4 <!--Grammar & style --> = yes |
|
|
| b5 <!--Supporting materials --> = yes |
|
|
| b6 <!--Accessibility --> = yes |
|
|
|importance=mid|category=Geography}} |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{British English}} |
|
{{Annual readership}} |
|
{{Outline of knowledge coverage|Slovenia}} |
|
|
{{Tmbox |
|
{{Tmbox |
|
|type = notice |
|
|type = notice |
| Line 35: |
Line 16: |
|
* '''All sections should be a summary of more detailed articles'''. If you find any points missing, please add it in the section's main article rather than on this page to keep this page size within reasonable limits. |
|
* '''All sections should be a summary of more detailed articles'''. If you find any points missing, please add it in the section's main article rather than on this page to keep this page size within reasonable limits. |
|
}} |
|
}} |
| ⚫ |
{{OnThisDay|date1=2005-06-25|oldid1=15835821|date2=2006-06-25|oldid2=60556749}} |
|
|
{{Auto archiving notice|small=yes|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=31|dounreplied=yes}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
| algo = old(31d) |
|
| algo = old(31d) |
| Line 47: |
Line 26: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== A better map? == |
|
== Italian War Crimes during Italian Fascist Occupation of Slovenia 1941-1943 and the change of British policy towards their persecution due to the possibility of Italian communists winning the 1946 general election == |
|
|
] |
|
|
Foreign Office (i.e. British civil authority, but not the military) policy was indeed '''initially''', as you say, in favor of 'hand-over' of the Italian war criminals, but the British and American '''military authorities''' in Italy were against it (p.520)<ref name="Pedaliu_JContHistory">] (2004) . Journal of Contemporary History. Vol. 39, No. 4, Special Issue: Collective Memory, pp. 503-529 (JStor.org full article)</ref>, but the Foreign Office changed its policy (ibid., p.523), too, when in 1946 the possibility was that '''Italian communists''' would win the Italian general election, which would open Italy to Soviet influence, so they decided to drop the case and let Italy do the job (ibid., p.526) resulting in the (highly indicative) fate of Graziani and Roatta (ibid., p.525). The British '''concern to secure''' the electoral victory of the '''Christian Democrats''' "prompted Britain to '''drop all of its war crimes claims against Italy'''" (ibid., p.527). See the screenshots from the scholarly article via JStor.org</br> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The clearest maps in thus article are one from the grim years of WWII and another of the climate zones with temperature charts included. The map of statistical regions is good but by design it lacks city names. I think it would improve the article to have a map showing major cities (especially Ljubljana) and showing enough of the neighboring nations to place it in Europe. I have seen such a map in the past, but cannot find it online now. |
|
{{talkref}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The map in the info box serves mainly to show it is a small nation. Reading that map, it pays to know that already, to find the dark green bit that is Slovenia. |
|
–– <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 11:18 9 October 2015 (UTC)</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall, this is an excellent article on a nation with a thriving present and a long and fascinating past. - - ] (]) 18:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC) |
|
== Slovenia in "Central, Eastern & Southeast Europe" == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regarding the unexplained anonymous edit made on Thursday - I fail to understand the basis for it. Slovenia is a country geographically, politically and culturally a part of Central Europe. There is an ongoing (and longlasting) dispute about whether or not it lies partly in the Balkans, but given the fact the Balkans has no exact geographical boundaries, it is only alternatively (even the main articles on Central and South Eastern Europe claim so) placed in South Eastern Europe (and under no conditions in Eastern Europe), with a majority of scholars giving it a benefit of doubt and placing the country exclusively in Central Europe both because of the Alps as well as its shared history with the rest of Central Europe via the Habsburg Empire. I would love to hear the explanation from the editor himself (and yes, I did read the previous discussion on this topic - I believe Oksfjord made a pretty good point there explaining it). Should there be no further explanation from the editor, I plan to revert to the previous version regarding the placement of Slovenia in Europe (i.e. to Central Europe exclusively). ] (]) 10:24, 18 October 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
:Please don't ignore the previous discussion on this in the archives "''Slovenia and the Balkans''", and establish consensus before any change. Thank You.(] (]) 01:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)) |
|
|
::Certainly, I intend to wait a couple of days first (perhaps a week or so) as it is impossible to establish a concensus with someone who does not respond. I didn't ignore that discussion, it provides a good insight into the issue, but given the fact that prior to this recent change Slovenia was placed in Central Europe and no party in that discussion altered that, I would assume that placement was eventually wholly acceptable to everybody involved. Cheers! ] (]) 14:16, 19 October 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
:::You don't need to, I restored it, it was my mistake, your are right. Cheers!(] (]) 07:06, 20 October 2020 (UTC)) |
|
|
::::Alright, great! No worries mate, glad this was sorted out. :) ] (]) 21:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
I am adding this text as a wake-me-up call. ] (]) 19:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
I am adding this text as a wake-me-up call. ] (]) 19:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC) |
The clearest maps in thus article are one from the grim years of WWII and another of the climate zones with temperature charts included. The map of statistical regions is good but by design it lacks city names. I think it would improve the article to have a map showing major cities (especially Ljubljana) and showing enough of the neighboring nations to place it in Europe. I have seen such a map in the past, but cannot find it online now.
The map in the info box serves mainly to show it is a small nation. Reading that map, it pays to know that already, to find the dark green bit that is Slovenia.
level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
