Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:38, 12 April 2007

Archives:

• User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 1 (Apr-Jul 2006)
• User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 2 (Jul-Aug 2006)
• User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 3 (Sept-Oct 2006)
• User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 4 (Oct 2006)
• User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 5 (Nov 2006)
• User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 6 (Dec 2006)
• User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 7 (Jan 2007)
• User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 8 (Feb 2007)
• User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 9 (Mar 2007)

Please add all comments in sections at the bottom.

Bad deletion of many articles

This user(NawlinWiki) has been proven to delete a lot of articles without much consent or notices. The wikipedia users ask stop doing this.

I agree. He deleted my article while I was writing an explanation of why it shouldn't be deleted, then his explanation was gibberish. KjtheDj 21:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I too agree. She did not read anything that i wrote about in my defence of keeping my article

OxMetrics article Speedy delete

Dear NawlinWiki,

The OxMetrics article you deleted on April 4, 2007 on the grounds of blatant advertising contains a factual (encyclopedic) description of a well respected Econometric Software. I am sorry you dislike this contribution

This software has a new name and is not well known in the US but it is certainly important for the econometrics community world wide, where its predecessors have been used for over 20 years. There is no inappropriate content. There is no copyright violation either, because I edited the description myself. 

Moreover, there are three comparable US products, GAUSS, RATS and Eviews with descriptions on Misplaced Pages that were not deleted. Those contributions made me think that it might be interesting to edit and OxMetrics article for Misplaced Pages.

 If you are interested in making Misplaced Pages a useful and up to date encyclopedia for smaller sciences like econometrics and
 mathematical statistics, you should allow  descriptions of scientific econometric (and statistical) softwares, old
and new, US and non-US.
 I hope you can undelete the article and its links if your are interested in making Misplaced Pages an interesting resource
 for smaller sciences and their corresponding softwares, which are essential tools for their application.

Criterion 11 for speedy deletion:

 Blatant advertising. Pages which exclusively promote a company, product, group, service, or person and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic.  Note that simply having a company, product, group, service, or person as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion; an article that is blatant advertising should have inappropriate content as well. If a page has previously gone through a deletion process and was not deleted, it should not be speedily deleted under this criterion.

Yours Sincerely, Marius Ooms

Muhammad Imran Masood

This article was recently speedied by you. The author keeps removing speedy tags in spite of the full cycle of warnings. I don't want to get into a edit war on the speedies with him, could you please help out. Dipics 14:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Studenterlauget article

5th March 2007

Hi. Just wanted to hear your story about the Studenterlauget article you deleted. Studenterlauget is a big part of the students lifes at the ASB and I feel that its natural to include the main student organization there. Also, I found a quite comprehensive article about studentersamfundet in Norway, which in many ways resembles Studenterlauget a lot.

Well, I hope to hear from you soon. Anyways its good you guys are dealing with the legitimacy of articles and cotents.

Later

7th March 2007

Hi again,

Im beginning to wonder whether this is the right place to post 'complaints'? I havent really seen any of the other users getting an answer.

- Bo

US v Laugenour

Okay, so you can speedy delete. You say "nonnotable case, but give no link to explain. It looks like DOJ ringers have commandeered Misplaced Pages to keep anything substantively useful to help people understand the true nature of income tax. Here, finally, I found a current court case in which the DOJ admits by acquiescence to just a tiny few of its crimes. And you speedy delete it. Don't you think it has value to people today to know why so called tax protestors aren't protesting income tax but protest the crimes committed by the IRS, DOJ, and judges?

I want to know how to get this info from the case documents, particularly judicial notices of FACTS, posted on wikipedia. --Bob Hurt 17:37, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Images

Image_talk:Robert_Post.jpg is not a G8 because it "contains deletion discussion that is not logged elsewhere." Hbdragon88 03:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

I don't know, the rfu process isn't obviously as mature as the VfD/AfD processes. Should there be a Misplaced Pages:Replaceable fair use image debates namespace? I guess I could start a topic at WP:VP and see what other people think. Hbdragon88 03:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Started. See Misplaced Pages:Village pump (proposals)#Replaceable fair use images for the details. Hbdragon88 04:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, Why are these pages deleted??Ane25 04:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Recreated

C for Cat was recreated. Just giving you a heads up. The Behnam 19:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm recreating a cleaned-up Eproctophilia that I first tagged for a speedy

Shortly after I tagged Eproctophilia for speedy delete, another user alerted me that the term was legitimate, as bizarre as it sounds. I'm recreating the article after cleaning it up, adding a citation, cats and a stub. I really can't believe I'm even dealing with this subject (especially after I just finished lunch), but I've gotta live by the rules. Realkyhick 20:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Boyteenpg13

I put a notice for a speedy delete on this page and noticed a block warning from yourself. --Stormbay 21:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Unfair deletion

You had no grounds to delete The Weapons (UK). It was NOT advertising, and I am making a complaint about you to Misplaced Pages —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.159.26.105 (talk) 12:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC).

Chang it

You and milburn deleted my article which took time and effort you are a disgrace to wikipedia how dare you! Jimmyr6 14:59, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Laugenour

Dear editor NawlinWiki: Hi, I don't know if you'll remember me; it's been a while.

I noticed your reference to the deletion of the article on USA v. Laugenour, and your notes to user Bobhurt. I'm sorry I didn't get a chance to read the article (I bet it was a real gem). Jut for your information, Bobhurt has been pushing nonsense about the Laugenour case off and on for the past few weeks in one form or another.

I noticed -- in an amazing coincidence -- that an anonymous user (at IP 68.200.46.69) who I believe has previously posted tax protester rhetoric on Bobhurt's user talk page also inserted "Laugenour" nonsense earlier today in the article on Income tax in the United States. I moved the material from that article over to the talk page for the article, with an explanation as to why it is a hoax. The Laugenour case itself is real, but the tax protester verbiage makes the preposterous argument that the government lawyers in that case "admitted" certain things. I had previously reviewed the case docket in that case and discovered that the argument is based on a totally laughable intepretation of the Federal Rules of Evidence -- something I had explained to Bobhurt weeks ago on another talk page. I put a similar explanation today on the talk page for Income tax in the United States.

By the way, I believe Bobhurt has also operated under the Misplaced Pages user name of BobHurt. Yours, Famspear 18:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Hasty deletion of Mark Britten

The total lifespan of this article was less than five minutes, with no one getting a chance to add any bio materials on this guy, who needs an article (see Chinaman (disambiguation)). I saw the speedy delete that was added VERY QUICKLY, and tried to add the "hangon" template but you'd already deleted the article. What's the rush? Please restore this article, or re-create it, as it's needed....Skookum1 19:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

(Copied from User talk:Skookum1#Mark Britten) Couldn't have waited 5 minutes, could you, from the moment I created the article? Was it my fault for not putting a inuse on the article? Was my fault that I didn't warn other users possibly interested in expanding the article that it was tagged for sd? Oh, wait a minute, I DID warn other users possibly interested in expanding the article that it was tagged for sd. And I did IMMEDIATELY. Problem is, you were even faster in deleting the article. Now I'll have to report your behaviour, sorry. --maf 19:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Update: Behaviour reported. --maf 19:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

User:Honda Pilot - I need another set of eyes or two

Hi NawlinWiki. I'd like another admin to have a look at User:Honda Pilot's talk page and contribs (neither is very long, he just arrived today) so that I can get a second opinion on his good faith. I don't think that you normally get involved in stuff like this, but I saw that you're online right now. I'm asking another pair of admins for opinions as well if you'd rather not comment. A Train 20:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, NW. A Train 20:22, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

See Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Jeff Defender. User Honda Pilot (talk · contribs), along with Uninsured Driver (talk · contribs) is part of the same set of puppets. These are no brand new users; they know all about AFD, RFA, ANI/I, and blocking policy (and are trying to influence it, to make their disruptive editing easier.) — SMcCandlish ツ 04:44, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

For db-ing my i2 image, — Darkest Hour 21:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

My Article on a Student

Excuse me, but you have been continuously deleting my article on a student, Aaron Hamrick, at my local college. I understand, it may not seem notable, but I assure you that the article is notable. This student is writing and publishing a highly anticipated book to come out sometime in 2009 or 2010. Many professors at our school and some local editors expect it to be very popular on the East Coast and perhaps even make a best seller list. You didn't even give me a chance to edit my article and add sources and facts before you deleted it. You've also given me a "last warning", which apparently means I cannot re-create the article unless I have your approval. Please get back to me right away on this, as I need to write this article for a small project for our school. And I request that you allow at least a week to let users develop their articles before you delete them. Thank you.

Jack Katz

Speedy delete Jack Katz nn ? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.110.181.107 (talk) 08:35, 5 April 2007 (UTC).

Speedying redirects

Hey, I just thought I'd check in with you on your speedy of Emmett Richmond. The redirect there wasn't vandalism; Emmett really is a character in the movie. I guess I just can't see the harm in the redirect. (I created the redirect to replace a two-sentence substub that had been created by a new editor—I didn't want to bite him with a deletion, and the redirect seemed to make sense.) Cheers, TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:40, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Drinking_game#Find_The_Pint

You deleted my article because (a7 nonnotable drinking game) but as you can see from the above link you can see we have been discussing this article and have finnaly agreed that it should be posted and i made sure i got the right section to post it in etc but you still deleted it YellowSnowRecords2 15:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Fuzzy Panda Recording Co.

This article was on the list of requested articles, so I created it. Thank you for taking the time, though. --Theunicyclegirl (talk, review me!) 17:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

please review

please review our article Alluc, I have tried to improve the article according to the notability guidlines, the general layout and the references and added extra articles.

/hoping for a fair judgment

Iyenweyel 18:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

The Skittish Empire

The Skittish empire is well deserving of a page. we are a reputable comedy group, with a large following and a need to communicate information to our fanbase who are interested in the specifics and formation of the group. I will admit that more careful eediting was needed on the page but that was no reason to delete it. I expect the page to be restored or a message outlining your reasons for deleting it please Blarneyboy

Lenny09 sockpuppet for Gerry2009?

This user has now fabricated Sid the Cat. I noticed that you gave User:Gerry2009 a final warning, or he would be blocked. So User:Lenny09 "afd"ed Shaun the Cat, then created Sid the Cat and vandalized Shaun the Sheep(a real show). What's next? --Lexein 01:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

• He's back under the name User:Micky80, recreating Sid the Cat again. I've posted under Suspected Sock Puppets/Micky80 and WP:AIV --Lexein 13:18, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

• Ah, that's better. Gone again. So, since I'm not an admin, what's the real best approach here, in future? What takes precedence, that the user is a sockpuppet, or that persistent hoax posting = vandalism? --Lexein 14:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
• Ok, in future, WP:AIV, sock of Lyle123. --Lexein 14:09, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Contested City Life's prod, but...

I "officially" contested City Life's prod, but as I mentioned in the edit summary, I have no problem with the proposal already in place to merge it with Dixie Square Mall. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Alluc. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Iyenweyel 07:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Dawood Hercules Chemicals Limited

You deleted an earlier version of Dawood Hercules Chemicals Limited as an advertisement. I suspect that it was a copyvio as well. I rewrote the article, which I think now sufficiently establishes notability, and which doesn't read like an advertisement. --Eastmain 13:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reversing the AfD on the Yorkshire Cricketer William Cartman. First class cricketers quite often get nominated by editors unaware of the game or wikipedia's notability policy regarding them so your prompt action saved me another tedious discussion about it. Thanks again. Nick mallory 16:44, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Sakura Sakurada

You speedily deleted this as WP:CSD#A7, "does not assert the importance or significance of its subject". I don't know if she is important, but the article used words like "very popular actress", which seems to be an assertion of importance. More specifically, the article asserts that she is known for performing in unusual films for Japan, unpixilated, with her mother, beasts, and urolagnia, which rather indicates that she might be notable. That seems to be worthy of an Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion debate at least. Do I have your OK to undelete it, please? --AnonEMouse

OK with me to restore, but I would immediately send it to AFD. There are no sources other than her own porno site. Thanks, NawlinWiki 19:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, restored. Feel free to AfD. I'm not the main defender of this particular sub-genre, but I know who is. :-) --AnonEMouse 19:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Brandon A. Harnois

User:Wikiartwriter has recreated the page. I tagged it with prod instead of CSD because it asserts notability. Is this correct, or is this justifiably CSD under vandalism? Thanks!--Xnuala (talk) 19:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Why

Why did you delete my page.

Your removal of {{db-bio}} tag in the article William Cartman

I noticed that you removed the tag on the grounds that it "asserts notability", as in your edit summary. While it does assert its notability, it does so per questionable or self-published sources. If you still feel that the article need not be deleted, please let me know and add {{Cricket-stub}} and {{wikify}}. Thanks,  ~Steptrip 00:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that last comment's wording, I didn't know how long that you have been this site (plus that you are an admin ;-).  ~Steptrip 00:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Deletion

Thanks for deleting the page, howz things after the hurricane? (i bet you've been asked a heap)

talk to symode09's or Spread the love! 12:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Ranapanna on WP:ANI

Yesterday, I reported Ranapanna for being a sockpuppet of User:Danny Daniel on WP:ANI. Squirepants101 20:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey Nawlin, I don't understand why you deleted the WebPrez page. I wasn't trying to advertise for them, simply stating what a WebPrez is. I use their product and its one of a kind. I've seen plenty of other web services listed here. What about GoDaddy's listing. Is that not an advertisement?

The user has recently vandalised List of My Gym Partner's a Monkey episodes. Squirepants101 23:49, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

The Apprentice UK

Hello, NawlinWiki/Archive 10 and thank you for your contributions on articles related to The Apprentice UK. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject The Apprentice UK, a WikiProject aiming to improve coverage of The Apprentice UK and related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to help out and participate, please come over and visit us here for more information. Thanks! Dalejenkins 19:31, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Spanish cobras

Hi can you dump the {{subst:AntiVandal|Spanish cobras|uw-copyright|3=url=http://www.street-gangz.com/viewtopic.php?t=344&sid=75ff1e1f2453bc81ec9e631fd1aa76d7}}~~~~ warning tag on the talk of the creator. You deleted the article before I could do it. exolon 23:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Toyspring

I know the Toyspring article wasn't finished, but it was about a commercial company that has rocked the PDA software world with some of its titles. Please undelete the page; I'll get it finished soon, but how can I finish the page if it is deleted? ;( —The preceding unsigned comment was added by KristopherWindsor (talk • contribs) 01:08, 9 April 2007 (UTC).

CTG Music (website)

The website belongs on Misplaced Pages because it is a fairly large online music community and has a small amount of renown. However, I sort of agree with you about the speedy deletion. Meh.. you can decide. Visit the website if you want and size it up. Nateland 14:53, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Ghostly Talk

This article was speedily deleted before I was complete. The reason given is not sufficient - as this radio program's hosts have been on Coast to Coast AM - a recent experiment of note was done there indicating life after death etc. etc. This is not a group, nor a debating society, nor some simple website, nor a company promotion but in the vain of Ghost Hunters - a reality tv program - nor is it an attempt at promotion. What a waste of time to put together information and not even be able to finish my contribution. Please state clearly your objections. --Northmeister 18:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

I do not accept your objections since I had not completed the article. Your haste is unwarranted and overdone. --Northmeister 18:34, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Now an AFD...see my comments there. You should learn a little about Wiki-etiquette. Instead of being helpful your now being disruptive - especially in light of my opening for discussion on the talk page. --Northmeister 20:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Slightly Confused

Hi there- you deleted my article, Accountants Inc., due to blatent advertising. I'm having trouble seeing which parts are advertising. I posted this page last month and it was taken down for the same reason but the advertising was obvious. I revised the article and thought I took care of this but now that it's been deleted again, I'm slightly confused. Can you offer me any suggestions? Thanks so much! Mbalestieri 19:05, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Deletion - William M. Lynk, CRL

I'm not quite sure how to do this, but I'll try. An employee added a bio of me to Misplaced Pages. Though I was not opposed to it, a neutral re-write would have been OK. It was deleted without any opportunity to change it. If my search skills are in tact, I believe you deleted it. I may be wrong there. Your suggestions? -William M. Lynk, CRL —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.40.111.94 (talk) 20:44, 9 April 2007 (UTC).

swadeshi

Hi there- you deleted my article, on swadeshi due to blatent advertising. I'm having trouble seeing which parts are advertising.then why you not deleted amway or other same companys article.I'm slightly confused. then first deleted all the article about network marketing companys and than u right to say that this is advertising.

Can you offer me any suggestions? Thanks so much!

Unfairly Deleting Pages

Look, you have deleted many pages, including mine, and to me, it's very rude. What gives you the right to be able to do this? Anyway, look at this list of people who say that you have deleted their pages without adequate reason. You could at least post on their page, or under talk, what your problem is, and we can respond. In the end, it's people's time you've wasted because they might have work really hard to make a page and you just delete it. THanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by White n nerdy115 (talk • contribs) 12:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC).

Vandalism to Pudsey article

Hi, thanks for your support in reverting this vandal User:Timey1, any chance you can warn/block this person, I am without admin powers --Speed Air Man 14:52, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Farthest Star

I deleted the article because in the current state both the parts (Farthest Star and Wall Around A Star) can be combined into the Saga of Cuckoo article. Given the stubby status all three has, I would say separate article was not needed. What do you think? --soum (0_o) 21:03, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, okay. Since it was set up for del, and because Ghits looked sort of underwhelming, I thought the redirect may not be needed. Anywayz, I will redir. :) Have a good day, or night, wherever you are. Cheers. --soum (0_o) 21:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Cold Gin

I've been attempting to redirect "Cold Gin" to "Cold Gin (Kiss song)". The Kiss song by this name is certainly notable, even if the Kiss tribute bands named after it are not. I seem to be having some difficulties doing it for some reason though. Gringo300 23:18, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok, someone else did it. Gringo300 23:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

A proposal for stopping a long standing edit war.

See Talk:adolescent sexuality for information on this proposal. It would create a branch off article containing solely views on the subject and hopefully get rid of the POV currently in the articles which are supposed to say what adolescent sexuality is. Not is it good or bad. In my opinion I say let the POV wars take place in an article ABOUT POV. not elsewhere. Tell us what you think at the above link.

I know you have next to nothing involvement with this article but it would help to have an AfD expert/really experienced wikipedian give inputNateland 02:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Impact Networking

Ok Nawlin I recreated the impact networking article and modeled after your ice records article so you shouldn't have a problem with it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jpeterson101 (talk • contribs) 07:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC).

Impact_Networking_Logo.jpg

Even if you didn't like the page you shouldn't have deleted the logo —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jpeterson101 (talk • contribs) 07:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC).

WHY did you delete our Medallion Sauces page ?

This is NOT an advertisement but a valid description of our company. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MedallionSauces (talk • contribs) 12:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC).

is anybody on here sick of nawlin deleting pages?

If so, please leave a message on my talk page, under 'put here if you think i'm being reasonable' but first please read 'my associations with Wikpedia' on my user page. Cominoverdahill2 15:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Two "Bunker" but ...

Nawlin, I see now that the user The.aldgate.bunker has created another article in another public space. I had created a user page for them, and moved an article from New Contributor's Help to it, so they could experiment in their own user space, but they haven't gotten the message yet, evidently. So your speedy deletion is well-justified. Pete St.John 16:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

But that was a sandbox page? I looked at the contributions history for that user and all I saw was the sandbox? Pete St.John