Misplaced Pages

Talk:Allied war crimes during World War II: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:55, 3 May 2024 edit82.41.94.112 (talk)No edit summaryTag: New topic← Previous edit Latest revision as of 07:42, 15 May 2024 edit undoWOSlinker (talk | contribs)Administrators854,881 editsm fix italics 
Line 32: Line 32:
*Cobain, Ian. , ], November 12, 2005. *Cobain, Ian. , ], November 12, 2005.
*Drayton, Richard. , ], May 10, 2005 *Drayton, Richard. , ], May 10, 2005
* Várdy, Steven Béla and Tooly, T. Hunt: '' Available as MS Word for Windows file (3.4 MB) Section: by Richard Dominic Wiggers, ''The United States and the Refusal to Feed German Civilians after World War II'' pp. 274 - 288 * Várdy, Steven Béla and Tooly, T. Hunt: '''' Available as MS Word for Windows file (3.4 MB) Section: by Richard Dominic Wiggers, ''The United States and the Refusal to Feed German Civilians after World War II'' pp. 274 - 288


--- ---

Latest revision as of 07:42, 15 May 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Allied war crimes during World War II article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 3 months 
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconMilitary history: World War II
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
B checklist
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
  1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met
  2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met
  3. Structure: criterion met
  4. Grammar and style: criterion not met
  5. Supporting materials: criterion met
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
World War II task force


Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11


This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Further reading

Books
Articles

--- temp storage

Rewriting of the 190.000 Rape Figure Quote

The figure of 190.000 at the end of the Western Allies, War Rape section of the article is heavily disputed and the method used to reach it has nigh to no basis in historical documents. The article from the Spiegel it uses as a source(link number 73) says exactly that in its fourth paragraph. Currently the only part indicating this in the article is the word "believes" in the quote from the second paragraph where they are just talking about the published work itself.

This whould be a simple edit I could do myself, but the article is semi-protected and my account does not meet the criteria for such an edit. It could be writen as a summary, not a quote, on the lines of:

"In 2015, the book "Als die Soldaten kamen" by the German historian Miriam Gebhardt was released sparking discussion on the topic of the image of the "greatest generation" though she also claims that 190.000 rapes were commited in germany by american solders until 1955. The book itself is critisized widely by other historians and journalists like Klaus-Dietmar Henke <"ref>https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/politische-buecher/sexuelle-gewalt-1945-rechenfehler-und-ungereimtheiten-13587370.html</ref> and the number is commented on by the Spiegel "Gebhardt is unable to present such evidence in sufficient quantity. Another estimate, stemming from US criminology professor Robert Lilly, who examined rape cases prosecuted by American military courts, arrived at a number of 11,000 serious sexual assaults committed by November, 1945 <"ref>https://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/book-claims-us-soldiers-raped-190-000-german-women-post-wwii-a-1021298.html</ref>"

Though at this point it should either be moved to "Portrayal" in a new section titled "recent" or removed in it's entirety as it does not add anything to the core article and negatively spreads misinformation through a out of context quote.

Removal of Holocaust denial references

Why is this even in the article? Isn't this pretty disrepectful to victims of the Holocaust and in other war crimes? I'm struggling to understand it. 2607:FB91:148B:4AED:AC39:6AF7:4FFC:66F1 (talk) 23:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

What is this article based on?

Much of this article seems to be WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. There seem to be few references to primary and secondary sources in some official authority that have determined certain acts of war to be war crimes. ♆ CUSH ♆ 19:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Dresden

Why is Dresden included? im pretty sure that multiple sources say that it was, indeed, an valid military target. 187.39.133.201 (talk) 21:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

To be honest, id say we get an moderator or someone here and actually do something, i see a lot of information with unreliable or missing sources, this article really needs major rework, and i cant do everything alone. 187.39.133.201 (talk) 22:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
I always thought Dresden was part of total war. 95.151.194.20 (talk) 20:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
I just deleted Dresden from this article. 95.151.194.20 (talk) 17:29, 25 June 2023 (UTC)

The following is unsubstantiated: 'Looting, rape, and prisoner executions were committed by British soldiers at a similar scale compared to other armies throughout the war.' 82.41.94.112 (talk) 13:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Categories: