Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Tim Bowles (3rd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:42, 13 April 2007 editJustanother (talk | contribs)9,266 edits start AfD  Revision as of 19:51, 13 April 2007 edit undoTilman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,568 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}
Delete as non-notable attorney. Two previous AfDs ended in "no consensus" with the majority of the "Keep" votes being placed by previously involved Scientology critics and the majority of the "Delete" votes by neutral editors. An admin, ], placed the ] and questioned the "No consensus" close of the first.<blockquote>''"] was closed as a "no consensus" in a self-contradictory closure despite a 5/2 count for deletion and no sourced claim that the subject – a lawyer for Scientology – is notable. . ."''</blockquote>--] 19:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC) Delete as non-notable attorney. Two previous AfDs ended in "no consensus" with the majority of the "Keep" votes being placed by previously involved Scientology critics and the majority of the "Delete" votes by neutral editors. An admin, ], placed the ] and questioned the "No consensus" close of the first.<blockquote>''"] was closed as a "no consensus" in a self-contradictory closure despite a 5/2 count for deletion and no sourced claim that the subject – a lawyer for Scientology – is notable. . ."''</blockquote>--] 19:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
*'''Speedy Keep''' - no new argument. Bowles was Moxon's partner . The two separated in the 90ies. Notable enough as a Moxon name partner, and who's still lawyer for scientology causes. --] 19:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:51, 13 April 2007

Tim Bowles

Delete as non-notable attorney. Two previous AfDs ended in "no consensus" with the majority of the "Keep" votes being placed by previously involved Scientology critics and the majority of the "Delete" votes by neutral editors. An admin, trialsanderrors, placed the 2nd AfD and questioned the "No consensus" close of the first.

"First AfD was closed as a "no consensus" in a self-contradictory closure despite a 5/2 count for deletion and no sourced claim that the subject – a lawyer for Scientology – is notable. . ."

--Justanother 19:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy Keep - no new argument. Bowles was Moxon's partner . The two separated in the 90ies. Notable enough as a Moxon name partner, and who's still lawyer for scientology causes. --Tilman 19:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Categories: