Misplaced Pages

Talk:Nordic Resistance Movement: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:48, 30 March 2024 editTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,882,812 editsm Remove unknown param from WP Politics: fascismTag: AWB← Previous edit Revision as of 09:54, 31 May 2024 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,380,561 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Nordic Resistance Movement/Archives/2024 1. (BOT)Next edit →
Line 27: Line 27:
| User1 = WikiHeathen | U1-EH = yes | U1-declared = yes |U1-otherlinks = |U1-banned = | User1 = WikiHeathen | U1-EH = yes | U1-declared = yes |U1-otherlinks = |U1-banned =
}} }}

== Primary sourcing ==

{{ping|Gooduserdude}} I don't believe that ''anything'' on this website should be sourced to any Nazi publication or outlet but I don't see how I could put that into practice on this page. My concern regarding the edit I reverted is more specific: it's the only thing on this article that's sourced to this organization's own website, which per ] is rarely allowed. The first requirement at that policy section says that if a primary source is used, it must be "''reputably published''" and I bet I'd have no problem compiling dozens, hundreds, ''thousands'' of lies, inflammatory statements, and attacks on that website to prove it's no such thing.

Would you agree to revert this change until a source without an obvious connection to this organization can be found? <b style="font-family: Segoe Script;">'']]]''</b> 20:39, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

::found non-primary source and added it thereafter ] (]) 21:02, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


== Allied to Azov brigade? == == Allied to Azov brigade? ==

Revision as of 09:54, 31 May 2024

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconPolitics: Political parties Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Political parties task force.
WikiProject iconSweden Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNorway
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconFinland Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinlandWikiProject icon
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconOrganizations
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.
The contents of the Neo-Nazi attack in Kärrtorp 2013 page were merged into Nordic Resistance Movement on June 29, 2014. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
The following Misplaced Pages contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Allied to Azov brigade?

The infobox says they're allied with Azov, but it seems like a stretch to say that they were and currently are allied like the article says. The source only says they have "links" to Azov and I wouldn't call going on a podcast together and them sending a delegation to meet Azov Brigade great evidence of an alliance or "close cooperation", especially given the NRM's stance on the war. On their website they seem to take a neutral or slightly pro-Russian stance on the conflict. They describe it as a "brother war" and say that "none of the conflicting sides are worth our official support" but they also say NATO provocation prompted Russia to invade. If anything, surely it'd be more accurate to say they're allied with and support Rusich group (a Russian neo-nazi group) given that they've worked with and sheltered the organization's second in command. 2403:580D:8038:0:F8EF:DB22:E3E2:E6D8 (talk) 08:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

This might sound counterintuitive, but supporting both Rusich/RIM and Azov isn't mutually exclusive. Atomwaffen and Base are neutral on the conflict and deal with both sides of the conflict, for example. Groups like this also send their people to the conflict area to gain military experience. Why limit yourself to one side? Both RIM and Azov run training camps for nazis, so might as well make most of a bad situation ("brother war"). I wouldn't oppose adding Rusich to the list of allied groups, but why take Azov out when they clearly do work together. Both Rusich and Azov have Finnish nazi volunteers to my knowledge.RKT7789 (talk) 14:33, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Categories: