| Revision as of 02:41, 12 June 2024 edit66.69.214.204 (talk) →Talk:Donald Trump: Add missing verbiageTags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:42, 12 June 2024 edit undoAcroterion (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators232,526 edits Restored revision 1228592604 by Acroterion (talk): This is not a place to filibuster, it's closedTags: Twinkle UndoNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| *:It's to a point ]. ''''']''''' <sup>(] / ])</sup> 01:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC) | *:It's to a point ]. ''''']''''' <sup>(] / ])</sup> 01:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
| *:Those who can, make logical arguments and present evidence like I did on that page. Those who can't, flail about with ] and ad hominem attacks like these. ] (]) 02:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC) | *:Those who can, make logical arguments and present evidence like I did on that page. Those who can't, flail about with ] and ad hominem attacks like these. ] (]) 02:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
| * Even though the RfC which prompted this request has closed, I'm asking for leaving this request for unprotection open. I'm doing so because the millisecond the requested page is unprotected, I intend to open a new RfC asking if "First American President to ever be convicted of a felony" should be added as the article's second sentence. Now I'm not saying that outside concerns like this should be the basis for your decision. But I do think they should give you pause and prompt you to think about whether you really want to be a walled garden or not. So admins, I would ask that you either grant my request or permanently block me. Please show us where you stand.] (]) 02:40, 12 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :] '''Declined'''<!-- Template:RFPP#deny --> '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 02:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC) | :] '''Declined'''<!-- Template:RFPP#deny --> '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 02:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:42, 12 June 2024
ShortcutsBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Shortcuts| Requests for page protection | |
|---|---|
|
Click here to return to Requests for page protection. Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection | |
Talk:Donald Trump
Reason: Should not have been protected, was not getting vandalized on a regular basis.2600:100C:B04A:3DB7:7D43:6C94:E4C6:BDBB (talk) 22:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support and I will add that I requested that the admin who protected the page unprotect it themselves. 66.69.214.204 (talk) 22:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Fuck no. Zinnober9 (talk) 23:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- I see that all pretensions of civility go out the window when it comes to stifling dissent. 66.69.214.204 (talk) 23:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose That page has been subjected to tendentious axe-grinding by IP editors, which wastes the time of productive editors. Cullen328 (talk) 01:26, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's to a point it's not just bound to that talk page. LilianaUwU 01:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
- Those who can, make logical arguments and present evidence like I did on that page. Those who can't, flail about with sealioning and ad hominem attacks like these. 66.69.214.204 (talk) 02:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Declined Acroterion (talk) 02:35, 12 June 2024 (UTC)