Revision as of 18:34, 19 June 2024 edit2804:d4b:9a6a:f200:ac3b:d332:cf8f:7e5d (talk)No edit summaryTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:36, 19 June 2024 edit undo2804:d4b:9a6a:f200:ac3b:d332:cf8f:7e5d (talk)No edit summaryTag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* For common cases of vandalism, just ''']''' them. | * For common cases of vandalism, just ''']''' them. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Policy |
{{Policy|WP:VD|WP:VAND|WP:VANDAL}} | ||
{{American English}} | {{American English}} | ||
{{Central|Category talk:Misplaced Pages vandalism}} | {{Central|Category talk:Misplaced Pages vandalism}} |
Revision as of 18:36, 19 June 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vandalism page. |
|
This is NOT the page for reporting vandalism.
This page is for discussion of the Misplaced Pages:Vandalism page and its associated official policy.
|
This page documents an English Misplaced Pages policy.It describes a widely accepted standard that editors should normally follow, though exceptions may apply. Changes made to it should reflect consensus. | Shortcuts |
This page is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, Category talk:Misplaced Pages vandalism redirects here. |
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Archives |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Semantics: Vandalism vs Harrassment distinction
Hi, why exactly does Misplaced Pages draw a line between vandalism and user harassment, considering both offences are treated the same (as far as I know)? Simple record-keeping? I‘m not an experienced user (as apparent by the IP address), but I‘m still curious. - Epsilon 2A09:80C0:192:0:7841:1E51:2CF6:E039 (talk) 11:20, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
description of image vandalism
Should Misplaced Pages:Vandalism#Image_vandalism perhaps be reworded so that it cannot be interpreted as claiming that it is okay to upload explicit images of minors? I can't imagine anyone would seriously read it that way, but I can't be the only one to have done a double-take when reading the description.
Cheers, Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 19:02, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Done. Dan Bloch (talk) 19:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Vandalism? Promotion?
IP-addresses including
posted in late February many television series releases (like ) on pages like 2024 in the Netherlands like they are notable events. It don’t seems notable?. But is it also vandalism or promotion? Or should it all be moved to pages like 2024 in Dutch television 82.174.61.58 (talk) 13:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
should be protected
the page should be protected Truth protest (talk) 23:44, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
I do not think that all humorous writing is vandalism, and this page could acknowledge that.
Considering that vandalism is done in bad faith, and does not need to be humorous. Vandals can attempt to destroy Misplaced Pages out of hate.
Examples of humorous writing that is in good faith, but still disruptive, is when adding constructive material in an excessively humorous style, or inserting jokes that are meant to improve the fun of reading the article (and therefore helping it), but the jokes are out of place. Misplaced Pages is a serious wiki, after all. Sites like TV Tropes are examples of sites with a lot of humorous writing in good faith, to the point where humor is featured in encyclopedic material.
There are templates to warn people who are adding inappropriate humor into pages, and where such writing is not proven to be vandalism (therefore not making those templates be redundant to those for warning about vandalism), and they are here, here, here, here and here.
How can this be acknowledged? Perhaps by mentioning something like this under "What is not vandalism" so that good-faith editors with too much humor can be seperated from those who want to damage this wiki, even if it can be hard to tell those two apart since humor happens to be common in vandalism. CarlFilip19 (talk) 13:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Categories: