| Revision as of 16:30, 17 June 2024 editSaqib (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users61,574 edits →Operation Kahuta: Editing comment ← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:48, 19 June 2024 edit undoZakaria1978 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,602 edits →Operation Kahuta: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ], ], ], and ]. ] ] 10:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ], ], ], and ]. ] ] 10:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)</small> | ||
| * '''Comment''': I've concerns about articles created by {{u|M Waleed}}, as they often include WP:OR and rely on questionable sources. Despite to use drafts instead of creating articles directly in the main namespace, it appears that my suggestions were not followed- hence this AFD nom. ] (] I ]) 16:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC) | * '''Comment''': I've concerns about articles created by {{u|M Waleed}}, as they often include WP:OR and rely on questionable sources. Despite to use drafts instead of creating articles directly in the main namespace, it appears that my suggestions were not followed- hence this AFD nom. ] (] I ]) 16:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' A non-notable one-sided claim does not need a separate article. ] (]) 23:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:48, 19 June 2024
Operation Kahuta
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Operation Kahuta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Pure fancruft created for POV pushing. All of the sources are nothing but invented claims of Pakistani officials not supported by any third party sources. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Indian, Israeli, American, British and Irish sources are included Waleed (talk) 04:21, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Cite them here. I don't see any which can establish WP:GNG. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- 3,4,5,8,9,10,16,17 are non-Pakistani sources which include the aforementioned sources including Israeli and Indian but also third party sources including the American air university Waleed (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Cite them here. I don't see any which can establish WP:GNG. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete : article lacks significant coverage from independent and reliable sources. The existing sources are primarily from partisan perspectives, failing to establish the article notability. Nxcrypto Message 05:28, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Non beligrent sources are also given as mentioned above Waleed (talk) 07:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not familiar with the subject but there does appear to be reliable sources covering it e.g. even if it's a fabricated plot it's still arguably notable. Traumnovelle (talk) 08:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Pakistan, Israel, and India. Owen× ☎ 10:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I've concerns about articles created by M Waleed, as they often include WP:OR and rely on questionable sources. Despite my advice to use drafts instead of creating articles directly in the main namespace, it appears that my suggestions were not followed- hence this AFD nom. Saqib (talk I contribs) 16:30, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delete A non-notable one-sided claim does not need a separate article. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 23:48, 19 June 2024 (UTC)