| Revision as of 17:39, 15 April 2007 edit195.56.224.237 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:42, 15 April 2007 edit undo195.56.224.237 (talk) →Tankred's lie #21030424000=Next edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ''<references />'' | ''<references />'' | ||
| The section was moved from ] here, by infed banned ]. Into that article, indef banned (for two month - LOL) ] moved from ] article. Into that article, the |
The section was moved from ] here, by infed banned ]. Into that article, indef banned (for two month - LOL) ] moved from ] article. Into that article, the refences were added by ] , so as the whole section. | ||
| So: | |||
| * |
*It was added by another user, not a banned one. | ||
| ⚫ | *The section does not |
||
| *Not only references but the whole "section", if two lines can be called a section. | |||
| ⚫ | *The section does not claiming that Caplovic was prime minister. Nor mentioning 2002 or any date, and nor in that kind of a context. | ||
| *Tankred claimed many times before, he's not speaking Hungarian, but here, claimes it is inaccurate. Well, it is not. http://www.stars21.com/ - a good page or text translator. | *Tankred claimed many times before, he's not speaking Hungarian, but here, claimes it is inaccurate. Well, it is not. http://www.stars21.com/ - a good page or text translator. | ||
Revision as of 17:42, 15 April 2007
Tag
The text of this article is not very well balanced and it is based to great degree on the information provided by HHRF, which is a Hungarian foundation protecting interests of the Hungarian minorities living abroad. They are far from being independent. Moreover, they are not supported by any major nongovernmental organization from outside Hungary, which is quite strange. I do not consider their website a credible and authoritative source and I tagged this article as non-compliant with the standards of Misplaced Pages until it cites only major credible sources that do not push a particular POV. Tankred 03:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
What if you would not call any source a POV, wich is not in Serbian or Slovak or not reflects your POV. You're maintaining a perfect double standard.
Tankred's lie #21030424000=
This is it: "A source added by a later banned user proved not to be accurate. Caplovic was not a deputy prime minister in 2002."
The incriminated section:
"Dusan Čaplovič, the vice-president of the Smer party, has called for the banning of singing the Hungarian national anthem in Catholic Churches, claiming that this is disloyal to Slovakia. Even Robert Fico, current prime minister and leader of the Smer party, has made controversial statements in this regard as well."
The section was moved from Anti-Hungarian sentiment here, by infed banned User:VinceB. Into that article, indef banned (for two month - LOL) User:Juro moved from Slovakization article. Into that article, the refences were added by User:Alphysikist , so as the whole section.
So:
- It was added by another user, not a banned one.
- Not only references but the whole "section", if two lines can be called a section.
- The section does not claiming that Caplovic was prime minister. Nor mentioning 2002 or any date, and nor in that kind of a context.
- Tankred claimed many times before, he's not speaking Hungarian, but here, claimes it is inaccurate. Well, it is not. http://www.stars21.com/ - a good page or text translator.
This is the problem, not User:VinceB (me). Speak nice, or die. --195.56.224.237 17:38, 15 April 2007 (UTC)