Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/Society, law, and sex: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:41, 11 April 2007 editWilyD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users32,255 edits rv - at the very least, the question of the reliability of some sources is part of the dispute - better to spell it out clearly anyways← Previous edit Revision as of 21:18, 15 April 2007 edit undoCentrx (talk | contribs)37,287 edits rm RfCs older than 1 monthNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
*] Does the article have appropriate length, neutrality and attribution? 18:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC) *] Does the article have appropriate length, neutrality and attribution? 18:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
*] - Is concluding that discrimination based on ethnicity is a kind of racism original research? Are the U.S. State Department, Amnesty International and the United Nations High Commission on Human Rights reliable sources? There may be more ... 13:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC) *] - Is concluding that discrimination based on ethnicity is a kind of racism original research? Are the U.S. State Department, Amnesty International and the United Nations High Commission on Human Rights reliable sources? There may be more ... 13:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
*] -- Edit-war problem: appropriate? See also ]. 22:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
*] -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --] 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
*] -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --] 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
*] -- Should it be consolidated with articles on other kinds of presumption? --] 03:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
* Dispute whether the should be removed. 16:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
*Is appropriate on its own? ].18:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
<!--Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign--> <!--Add new items at the TOP, NOT HERE. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign-->

Revision as of 21:18, 15 April 2007

Shortcut
  • ]

Template:RFCheader

  • ] Article on a (former?) ethnic/racial group in South Africa incorporating text from 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica includes some loaded and/or outdated terminology. Please help to update the article with non-offensive and current terminology. 02:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Talk:Circumcision#Draft passage on forced circumcisions: Should information about forced circumcisions be added to the article? 15:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Talk:Islamic military jurisprudence Is it necessary to cite actual judicial decisions and precedent when citing topics in this article? 18:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Talk:Monarchy_in_Canada#Request_for_Comments:_Length.2C_Neutrality.2C_Attribution Does the article have appropriate length, neutrality and attribution? 18:18, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Talk:Racism by country#Iran II - Is concluding that discrimination based on ethnicity is a kind of racism original research? Are the U.S. State Department, Amnesty International and the United Nations High Commission on Human Rights reliable sources? There may be more ... 13:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC)