Revision as of 04:43, 15 April 2007 editShadowbot3 (talk | contribs)51,520 editsm Automated archival of 2 sections to User talk:Tawker/Apr07← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:27, 16 April 2007 edit undoShadowbot3 (talk | contribs)51,520 editsm Automated archival of 2 sections to User talk:Tawker/Apr07Next edit → | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Don't Remove Speedy Tags== | ==Don't Remove Speedy Tags== | ||
Please do not remove speedy tags. If you diasgree with a speedy deletion add <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the top of the page. If you remove it again, I will report to an admin and you will be blocked. | Please do not remove speedy tags. If you diasgree with a speedy deletion add <nowiki>{{hangon}}</nowiki> to the top of the page. If you remove it again, I will report to an admin and you will be blocked. | ||
== Hilary Duff == | |||
The following message has been received :- | |||
Your recent edit to Hilary Duff (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Misplaced Pages articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
This was a legitimate edit showing the position a single had reached in the Italian charts, and there seems no reason why the bot should consider it to be vandalism. Is the bot malfunctioning or is this simply something that can be put right by restoring the edit? | |||
] 16:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
:It was the CAPS in the edit that caused it. I'll see what I can do... its a hard one to catch, most of the time its edits like XXX IS STUPID that we see which the bot is designed to catch, thanks for the note and fixing it. -- ] 23:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
== 1 year == | |||
<pre>04:25, 10 April 2006 Linuxbeak (Talk | contribs | block) changed rights for User:Tawker from (none) to (none) (+sysop) </pre> | |||
Happy sysop-ship anniversery! (a wee-bit late) ''']''' <small>'''<font color="#002bb8">]</font>'''</small> 21:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Yay! Happy anniversery, Tawker. <strong>]<font color="red">]</font></strong> 21:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
::Ok, I'll go find the cake :) -- ] 23:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | == ] == |
Revision as of 04:27, 16 April 2007
Tawker is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon. |
Ok, the bot takes care of almost everything I do, I'm swamped with work right now. I'm outta here. If you need anything urgent, email me. -- Tawker 01:03, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tawker/Dec07. Sections without timestamps are not archived |
Archives (by month) @ User talk:Tawker/Archives
Removal of template acknowledging source of imported material
Please see Template talk:EnPW. I see that a dozen or more pages had that acknowledgment removed "per Danny". A violation of license, on the face of it. Robin Patterson 18 Feb 2007
Master Nan
I assume you are the one who deleted the article on Master Nan. I can't understand why you did that as the sources were cited and corrections were made to avoid copyright infringement. Moreover, at the time the only tag on the article was for the article to be cleaned up. All I did was try to reiterate some facts on a famous buddhist scholar and all the work put into it has been deleted in a flash and without warning. I cannot claim to be tech savvy enough to know whether you are directly responsible, but if so, it makes unfamiliar and new contributors like myself have a strong sense of distaste that there is not even the chance for correction. What's the point of trying to establish an article if it keeps on getting deleted before it's done. If you could please give specific reasons why it was deleted as the article was rewritten to avoid copyright infringement.
Don't Remove Speedy Tags
Please do not remove speedy tags. If you diasgree with a speedy deletion add {{hangon}} to the top of the page. If you remove it again, I will report to an admin and you will be blocked.
Overtime (ice hockey)
Don't know if you will see this in time, but I highly suggest protecting the page. Its going to see a lot of attention in the next few days, and already is getting hit pretty hard. Kaiser matias 07:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for semi protecting my user page. Although the vandalism was funny, it was getting a bit old. Thank you again. Moorematthews 17:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC)