Revision as of 19:53, 4 April 2007 editMoosa17 (talk | contribs)26 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:14, 16 April 2007 edit undoNortonew (talk | contribs)264 edits "Theory" SectionNext edit → | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
That is indeed his ''right'' hand... not his left. Edit made accordingly. ] 19:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | That is indeed his ''right'' hand... not his left. Edit made accordingly. ] 19:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
== "Theory" Section == | |||
The theory section should have some sort of citation added that shows exactly _whose_ theory this is and possibly how well recepted this theory is by other reknown art historians. ] 15:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:14, 16 April 2007
Visual arts Stub‑class | |||||||
|
I think Bacchus is by Francesco Melzi. How is it Francesco's, do you say? compare the noses of Leonardo's St. John the Baptist to this piece. Then look at any picture from Francesco. Notice how Francesco's noses look more like the one in this piece? - Ёřųрţǐŏη257
All of the art history books in existence seem to collaborate on the idea that this was Da Vinci's last piece. Many artists at the time had radical pieces of art at the end of their carreers. This painting seems to follow that principle.
You're thinking of St. John the Baptist. THAT was Leonardo's "radical piece". Ëŕüρţìöň257
That is indeed his right hand... not his left. Edit made accordingly. Moosa17 19:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
"Theory" Section
The theory section should have some sort of citation added that shows exactly _whose_ theory this is and possibly how well recepted this theory is by other reknown art historians. Nortonew 15:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Categories: