| Revision as of 21:27, 19 July 2024 editKoavf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,174,994 edits →Why do you keep on doing this?: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:29, 19 July 2024 edit undoKoavf (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,174,994 edits →Why do you keep on doing this?Next edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| :You've also done this and likely at other articles. Please undo this per ArbCom's words above on all the articles where you have changed an existing style. ―]<span style="color:red">❤]☮]☺]☯</span> 09:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | :You've also done this and likely at other articles. Please undo this per ArbCom's words above on all the articles where you have changed an existing style. ―]<span style="color:red">❤]☮]☺]☯</span> 09:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ::"'''unless there is some substantial reason for the change'''" Quite literally in the explanation here that you gave. Your tracklisting lacked information valuable to the article. It is a DUETS album and the tracklisting lacked any indication of the featured vocalists. It was an incomplete piece of information. I am tired of your hostile attitude towards me editing Misplaced Pages in good faith and for the better just because it doesn't suit your particular outdated style of things. ] (]) 21:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | ::"'''unless there is some substantial reason for the change'''" Quite literally in the explanation here that you gave. Your tracklisting lacked information valuable to the article. It is a DUETS album and the tracklisting lacked any indication of the featured vocalists. It was an incomplete piece of information. I am tired of your hostile attitude towards me editing Misplaced Pages in good faith and for the better just because it doesn't suit your particular outdated style of things. ] (]) 21:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :::There is no need to use that template and there 100% is no substantial reason . Please tell me why you did this. ―]<span style="color:red">❤]☮]☺]☯</span> 21:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | :::There is no need to use that template and there 100% is no substantial reason . Please tell me why you did this. As you likely know, there is no requirement to use {{tl|track listing}} for duets, as 1.) this is listed in the personnel section and 2.) plenty of articles are just fine without it (e.g. ]). You are making changes without consensus to your preferred version in direct contradiction to ArbCom's directives. I am asking you to revert yourself and ask for consensus ''prior'' to changing styles. ―]<span style="color:red">❤]☮]☺]☯</span> 21:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:29, 19 July 2024
 Archives |
Why do you keep on doing this?
We have discussed this multiple times and you persist in doing this for years. You have once again changed the track listing style on an established article. We have talked about this so many times. Why do you keep doing it in spite of what MOS:VAR and WP:ALBUMSTYLE explicitly say (bold added): "When either of two styles is acceptable it is inappropriate for a Misplaced Pages editor to change from one style to another unless there is some substantial reason for the change." If you do not revert this change, I will escalate this matter. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:40, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- You've also done this here and likely at other articles. Please undo this per ArbCom's words above on all the articles where you have changed an existing style. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- "unless there is some substantial reason for the change" Quite literally in the explanation here that you gave. Your tracklisting lacked information valuable to the article. It is a DUETS album and the tracklisting lacked any indication of the featured vocalists. It was an incomplete piece of information. I am tired of your hostile attitude towards me editing Misplaced Pages in good faith and for the better just because it doesn't suit your particular outdated style of things. CloversMallRat (talk) 21:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- There is no need to use that template and there 100% is no substantial reason here. Please tell me why you did this. As you likely know, there is no requirement to use {{track listing}} for duets, as 1.) this is listed in the personnel section and 2.) plenty of articles are just fine without it (e.g. Tears of Stone (album)). You are making changes without consensus to your preferred version in direct contradiction to ArbCom's directives. I am asking you to revert yourself and ask for consensus prior to changing styles. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
- "unless there is some substantial reason for the change" Quite literally in the explanation here that you gave. Your tracklisting lacked information valuable to the article. It is a DUETS album and the tracklisting lacked any indication of the featured vocalists. It was an incomplete piece of information. I am tired of your hostile attitude towards me editing Misplaced Pages in good faith and for the better just because it doesn't suit your particular outdated style of things. CloversMallRat (talk) 21:26, 19 July 2024 (UTC)