| Revision as of 23:06, 13 July 2024 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,381,115 editsm Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:Chariotrider555/Archives/2024/April. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:16, 26 July 2024 edit undoDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots670,798 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)Tag: Disambiguation links addedNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 6#Siddiqui}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> — ] ] 10:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC) | The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 6#Siddiqui}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> — ] ] 10:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for July 26 == | |||
| An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages. | |||
| :] | |||
| ::added links pointing to ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] | |||
| (].) --] (]) 09:16, 26 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:16, 26 July 2024
Sat-Sudra
A new user created this article removing the redirect in the process. Apparently a caste warrior, they seem to be adding OR, as seen here, which was reverted by me. My concern is about the newly created article. Have a look, also @Ekdalian and Ratnahastin:. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:11, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- It has very poor sourcing from what I can see, all sources have no page number, some only have a snippet view. They've used translations of religious texts such as Shikshapatri ,Brahma Purana and Shrimad Bhagwatam as references. They've also cited Sathya Sai Baba's discourses as a source. I also see some non academic self published sources such as Sharma,Anurag(2022). Ratnahastin (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Ratnahastin.
- Fylindfotberserk, I have posted messages including DS alert on the user talk page. The article definitely requires review and removal of poorly sourced content & OR (POV-pushing)! Couldn't manage enough time today. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 18:20, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Swadhyaya Movement
Hello, I am impressed with your work on Pushtimarga. I had created the Pushimarg Baithak article but could not fix the main article. Swadhyaya Movement also needs your attention as you did with Pushtimarga Sampradaya. Except first two sections, all of the article is uncited. There are several scholarly sources for the subject. Thank you,- Nizil (talk) 13:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- User:Nizil Shah. Thank you for the appreciation of my additions at Pushtimarga Sampradaya. At this time, I do not have much interest in improving the Swadhyaya Movement article beyond surface level removals of blatantly unencyclopedic content. Hopefully editors will take that article places and make some good changes. Chariotrider555 (talk) 22:58, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
"Siddiqui" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Siddiqui has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 6 § Siddiqui until a consensus is reached. — AP 499D25 (talk) 10:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 26 July 2024 (UTC)