Misplaced Pages

User talk:Flusapochterasumesch: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:53, 28 July 2024 editFlusapochterasumesch (talk | contribs)393 edits →July 2024: ReplyTags: Reverted Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 01:55, 28 July 2024 edit undoFlusapochterasumesch (talk | contribs)393 editsm corrected 'being' to 'begin'. My typography was negatively affected by being very upset.Tag: RevertedNext edit →
Line 58: Line 58:


::{{ec}} Seems disruptive to me. These kind of concerns with an article should be discussed on the talk page. I was not "threatening" you. - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 01:26, 28 July 2024 (UTC) ::{{ec}} Seems disruptive to me. These kind of concerns with an article should be discussed on the talk page. I was not "threatening" you. - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS">] <small>(])</small></span> 01:26, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
:::Not threatening? You being by stating that in your opinion my edits were "disruptive" then you go on to assert that because of my "disruptive" edits I might be banned? That sounded very threatening to me. While I am sure your knee-jerk over-reactions were well-intentioned, I regret to admit I found them offensive and ill-founded. When is erotic imagery not pornography? And what is the issue when the article states in several places that Bomis was a porn site. And how can any right-minded person defend the idea that "not unsuccessful" is not the same as "unsuccessful"? I am going to take a pair of days to sit out, calm down and reflect meaningfully on your discord. I respectfully suggest you may benefit from doing the same. Often a period of reflection is all that is required to turn a wrong into a right. ] (]) 01:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC) :::Not threatening? You begin by stating that in your opinion my edits were "disruptive" then you go on to assert that because of my "disruptive" edits I might be banned? That sounded very threatening to me. While I am sure your knee-jerk over-reactions were well-intentioned, I regret to admit I found them offensive and ill-founded. When is erotic imagery not pornography? And what is the issue when the article states in several places that Bomis was a porn site. And how can any right-minded person defend the idea that "not unsuccessful" is not the same as "unsuccessful"? I am going to take a pair of days to sit out, calm down and reflect meaningfully on your discord. I respectfully suggest you may benefit from doing the same. Often a period of reflection is all that is required to turn a wrong into a right. ] (]) 01:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:55, 28 July 2024

Hello, Flusapochterasumesch, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Yuchitown (talk) 15:19, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Getting started Finding your way around Editing articles Getting help How you can help

July 2024

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Jimmy Wales. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:10, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

No. Not accepted. I request you to explain. My edit/s were not intended to be disruptive nor do I believe they can be regarded as such. I have fully explained my rationale/s alongside the few edits I have just made. So it is now your duty to explain your reasoning - not to blithely and tangentially rest upon it, whatever it might be. Over to you. Flusapochterasumesch (talk) 01:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
I do not appreciate you coming to my Talk Page, being reactive, and threatening me. "Was not successful" is unsuccessful. "Erotic imagery" is pornography. Garbage English is Garbage English. Flusapochterasumesch (talk) 01:24, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Seems disruptive to me. These kind of concerns with an article should be discussed on the talk page. I was not "threatening" you. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:26, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Not threatening? You begin by stating that in your opinion my edits were "disruptive" then you go on to assert that because of my "disruptive" edits I might be banned? That sounded very threatening to me. While I am sure your knee-jerk over-reactions were well-intentioned, I regret to admit I found them offensive and ill-founded. When is erotic imagery not pornography? And what is the issue when the article states in several places that Bomis was a porn site. And how can any right-minded person defend the idea that "not unsuccessful" is not the same as "unsuccessful"? I am going to take a pair of days to sit out, calm down and reflect meaningfully on your discord. I respectfully suggest you may benefit from doing the same. Often a period of reflection is all that is required to turn a wrong into a right. Flusapochterasumesch (talk) 01:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC)