Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:52, 17 August 2024

Archives

Index Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

First Message Ever, Let it be archived i guess

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. An edit that you recently made to Sherlock (software) seemed to be a test and it has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:07, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Uncommitted's 2024 results in the notable campaigns section to include results of primaries after Super Tuesday.

My edit "Uncommitted has since earned delegates in Massachusetts, Hawaii, Missouri, Rhode Island, and Kentucky" was reverted without discussion. I agree that the info box table contains the same information within a comprehensive table that I updated on the page. However, some people are not going to be drawn to the table when looking for an individual state narrative. We should support multiple learning modalities for something as important as months of progress by the uncommitted movement. Many people will likely only read a narrative and not search through tabular data. I believe this information about delegates gained since Super Tuesday is important to be in a narrative format. Smobes (talk) 22:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

... i mean, go ahead. im not gonna editwar, but like, the table is there.

if i dont revert, someone else probably will in a few months or a year. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 22:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Philly Palestine Coalition

Hello, Sawerchessread. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Philly Palestine Coalition, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Hello, in this revert, you restored content that, according to both Misplaced Pages policy (WP:NOCONSENSUS) and admin feedback following a failed RFC, should be removed from the article. Additionally, you did so without providing an edit summary. This is not the first time you have made a controversial revert without providing an edit summary, as you did previously here. 916crdshn (talk) 07:32, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Apologies for the first revert, should have provided an edit summary.

Second revert, by WP:BRD, a bold deletion of long-standing fact by editor was reverted.

In the future, if you have an issue with an edit, put the information in the talk space. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Philly Palestine Coalition

Hello, Sawerchessread. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Philly Palestine Coalition".

In accordance with our policy that Misplaced Pages is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Liz 02:02, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

NP. I think i abandoned it. User:Sawerchessread (talk) 02:09, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your hard work at TESCREAL. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:22, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bluethricecreamman. Thank you for your work on Environmental impacts of artificial intelligence. Another editor, Broc, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice article!!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 11:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you...

@User:Sawerchessread, for looking in at the Pamela Paul article, and I hope you continue to do so.

I appreciate in all contexts your effort to keep us editting NPOV, and otherwise compliant with WP policy and guideline articles supporting accuracy and balance. (In this description I would include WP:VERIFY and WP:OR, significantly.)

I would note—with no sense of offense, rather, an eye for irony—that recent action at that article, perhaps resulting from my drumbeating that others keep watch there, led to protection of Pamela Paul, with consequence that the former POV/OR editor (red letter and one-time, but registered) is allowed still to edit, but I (retired and no longer registered) am disallowed.

That is, the direct but simplistic administrative solution to that brewing but nevertheless still only potential for edit warring had as its impact removal of one trying to safeguard the article with regard to WP:NPOV, WP:VER, WP:OR, etc.!

I can certainly redeem time otherwise, but I still favour not being sidelined, and so being part of a dyamic, editorial, non-administrative solution. (Unfortunately, for reasons of organisational security, our working via registration is no longer an option.)

Cheers, and thank you again. 98.206.30.195 (talk) 19:37, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

thank you for your work. I'm somewhat new at this and have only started editting the past 6-7 months.

I think this page is regularly the target of IP editors, some of whom had less noble intentions than you.

I have my eye on it though, as do others. Apologies for interrupting your work. If you want, use the WP:EDITREQUEST and I'll try to handle it for you. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 20:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Queer advocacy in the Israel–Hamas War has been accepted

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Misplaced Pages! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Existential risk studies

Hello, how are you?

Given your interest in TESCREAL, I suppose you might also be interested in this topic of existential risk studies, which I have decided to make. If you do have an interest to take a look, it is in my . I have also submitted the article to review, a process which I have zero experience with. Feel free to give any advice or proposition of change.

Bye. JoaquimCebuano (talk) 03:12, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

hey. ill take a look.

idk the exact details but WP:CANVASSING

may discourage asking for folks who happen to agree with you often from approving work.

ill still take a look but im not the most knowledgeable about most existential risk philosophies, just happened to have noticed TESCREAL had been deleted and thought that it seemed egregious that it had been removed like that. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 06:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. I didnt know this rule. The article was still in my drafts that moment, so it would more about suggestions. But it was quite a fast process of approval anyway, just a few minutes. JoaquimCebuano (talk) 18:27, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Move discussion for "Ashkenazi genius" or whatever it's called

Do you want to start an (open-ended?) move discussion for Ashkenazi_Jewish_intelligence, now that the deletion discussion is over? IIRC you mentioned an interest in changing the article title during the AfD.

I have some experience with move discussions under my belt now ;)

— Jruderman (talk) 09:49, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Done. started a section. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 16:59, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

WP:1RR at Genocide of indigenous peoples

Hi; at topics related to the Israel-Arab conflict, editors are restricted to one revert every 24 hours: An editor must not perform more than one reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert.

You have made two reverts within a 24 hour period:

1. 13:21, 6 August 2024
2. 20:28, 5 August 2024

Please self-revert 13:21, 6 August 2024 to bring yourself back into compliance with this restriction. BilledMammal (talk) 13:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

12:44, 7 August 2024 seems like another 1RR violation, coming less than 24 hours after your 13:21, 6 August 2024 revert - please self-revert again. BilledMammal (talk) 23:21, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

No. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 23:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

I really don't want to have to take you to AE over this, but if your only response is "no" I don't have much choice - can you at least explain why you feel a revert is not required? BilledMammal (talk) 23:23, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

They don't count a revert then self-revert as a revert in editwarring. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 23:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

The self-revert (13:51, 6 August 2024) doesn't count, but the initial revert (13:21, 6 August 2024) can, particularly when it is on the same content.

You've reinstated this content four times now, three of them in less than 48 hours; I think it would be in your best interests to self revert. BilledMammal (talk) 23:28, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

No. If you want to intimidate, you're failing. If you want to report, get it over with already. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 23:28, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Misplaced Pages’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Misplaced Pages administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Misplaced Pages;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Bluethricecreamman. Thank you.

1R

Fyi, the 1R rule only applies to the AI/IP material. Selfstudier (talk) 15:18, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Environmental impacts of artificial intelligence

On 13 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Environmental impacts of artificial intelligence, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that researchers estimated that training the model for ChatGPT used the equivalent energy footprint of "driving 123 gasoline-powered passenger vehicles for a year"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Environmental impacts of artificial intelligence. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Environmental impacts of artificial intelligence), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft:List of BL dramas

Hello, I'm the creator of Draft:List of BL dramas that you recently declined. Thank you for your comment, but I still find myself wondering why the article falls under WP:NOTDIRECTORY when directory lists like List of teen dramas exist. BL/Boys' love is a genre that falls under the category of LGBT works whose related lists can be found plenty in Misplaced Pages, and the existence of BL is covered by reliable sources which can be seen in its main article Yaoi. I'm hoping to receive input on whether if I can improve the article for future resubmission. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 00:13, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

@HypeBoy ah.. Ok, maybe declining was a mistake.

I didn't fully read the WP:NLIST and WP:NOTADIRECTORY. If you submit again, ill accept.

Im still a probationary AFC reviewer and got review powers last month, apologies! Bluethricecreamman (talk) 00:19, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

@Bluethricecreamman: I see, no worries! I just resubmitted the draft article, I'm hoping you can accept the submission, please. Thank you. — ‎‎‎hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 00:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Contentious topics alert for all page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them.

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Misplaced Pages:Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. Doug Weller talk 16:11, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

Arbitration notice

You are involved in a recently filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Referral from the Artibration Enforcement noticeboard regarding behavior in Palestine-Israel articles and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Misplaced Pages:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks,

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 17:52, 17 August 2024 (UTC)